On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 10:41:28 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
>
> Actually, since sending mail is synchronous, there shouldn't be any
> issues with buffering or timing. If Emacs successfully sends the
> message, it will wait for the OK response (`smtpmail-via-smtp'), which
> should indicate that th
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 09:57:53 -0500, David Bremner wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jul 2011 06:23:48 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
> wrote:
> > Do not redirect test_emacs stderr to /dev/null. Test_emacs uses
> > emacsclient(1) now and it does not print unwanted messages (like
> > those from `message') to stderr.
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 23:07:38 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 10:41:28 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> >
> > Actually, since sending mail is synchronous, there shouldn't be any
> > issues with buffering or timing. If Emacs successfully sends the
> > message, it will wait for the
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 13:12:31 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> So for some reason this patch and the three that follow it were not
> pushed when the first was. They were all incorrectly marked in nmbug as
> being pushed well. I assume this was just an oversight. In any event,
> these should
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:08:15 -0500, David Bremner wrote:
> From: David Bremner
>
> The main idea is consider the notmuch database as analogous to the
> work-tree. A bare git repo is maintained in the users home directory,
> with a tree of the form tags/$message-id/$tag
I pushed a slightly modif
On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 10:23:23 +0200, Pieter Praet wrote:
> Should provide full test coverage of the stashing feature.
>
I (finally) pushed this pair of patches.
d
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 09:57:53 -0500, David Bremner wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jul 2011 06:23:48 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin gmail.com> wrote:
> > Do not redirect test_emacs stderr to /dev/null. Test_emacs uses
> > emacsclient(1) now and it does not print unwanted messages (like
> > those from `message') to
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 13:12:31 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
> So for some reason this patch and the three that follow it were not
> pushed when the first was. They were all incorrectly marked in nmbug as
> being pushed well. I assume this was just an oversight. In any event,
> these shoul
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:08:15 -0500, David Bremner wrote:
> From: David Bremner
>
> The main idea is consider the notmuch database as analogous to the
> work-tree. A bare git repo is maintained in the users home directory,
> with a tree of the form tags/$message-id/$tag
I pushed a slightly modif
On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 10:23:23 +0200, Pieter Praet wrote:
> Should provide full test coverage of the stashing feature.
>
I (finally) pushed this pair of patches.
d
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 09:52:51 -0500, David Bremner wrote:
> What do you think about the approach in
>
> id:"1309422050-23241-1-git-send-email-pie...@praet.org"
>
> I sortof like the idea of having with and without prefix bindings.
That seems like a totally reasonable solution to me.
> Or m
hment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/2012/04feaca3/attachment.pgp>
This seems like a pretty obviously important set of tests that was
missing. Thanks, Austin.
jamie.
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
This seems like a pretty obviously important set of tests that was
missing. Thanks, Austin.
jamie.
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 23:07:38 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> 1) add line
> { echo QUIT > /dev/tcp/127.0.0.1/25025; } 2>/dev/null
I have no directory called "/dev/tcp" on my system.
jamie.
pgpQDhwBJFSC7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
notmuch ma
me: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/2012/74c8baa0/attachment.pgp>
So for some reason this patch and the three that follow it were not
pushed when the first was. They were all incorrectly marked in nmbug as
being pushed well. I assume this was just an oversight. In any event,
these should be pushed, since they normalize the behavior of this
keybinding, and fix
documentation.
jamie.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20111112/eec86434/attachment.pgp>
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 10:41:28 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
>
> Actually, since sending mail is synchronous, there shouldn't be any
> issues with buffering or timing. If Emacs successfully sends the
> message, it will wait for the OK response (`smtpmail-via-smtp'), which
> should indicate that th
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 21:49:41 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> Good idea, but this introduces a dependency on netcat. Would it work
> to simply kill the SMTP dummy?
I cannot guarantee 6 nines of probability (but can guarantee as many eights
as one migh wish ;)
Socket buffering and timing might ca
Any junk bytes in sockaddr_in structure before passing that
to bind() system call may cause problems.
---
Thanks Austin. Consistent style matters... And dropped the peer_addr
setting after reading accept(2) namual page.
test/smtp-dummy.c |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 14:03:54 +0200, Thomas Jost
wrote:
> - The first one adds a face for crypto parts headers, because a hardcoded blue
> foreground looks quite ugly with my color theme.
> - The second one creates a customizable notmuch-mua-switch-function, which is
> then passed to message-m
Quoth David Bremner on Nov 12 at 11:13 am:
> On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 17:55:35 +0200, Pieter Praet wrote:
> > In order to be consistent with `notmuch-search-{add,remove}-tag' ("+"/"-"),
> > `notmuch-search-operate-all' ("*") should operate on matching threads
> > instead of matching messages.
> >
>
>
LGTM
Quoth Tomi Ollila on Nov 11 at 1:43 am:
> In the last line of run_emacs, exec the emacs process.
> With one fork less the process list is (also) neater.
> ---
> test/test-lib.sh |2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/test/test-lib.sh b/test/test-lib.
On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 17:55:35 +0200, Pieter Praet wrote:
> In order to be consistent with `notmuch-search-{add,remove}-tag' ("+"/"-"),
> `notmuch-search-operate-all' ("*") should operate on matching threads
> instead of matching messages.
>
As far as I can tell, the follow-up series for the race
Quoth Tomi Ollila on Nov 12 at 12:02 pm:
> On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 21:49:41 -0500, Austin Clements
> wrote:
> > Good idea, but this introduces a dependency on netcat. Would it work
> > to simply kill the SMTP dummy?
>
> I cannot guarantee 6 nines of probability (but can guarantee as many eights
> a
On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 10:20:29 +0200, Pieter Praet wrote:
> Alter `do_search_tags()' to prepend each result with `tag:',
> and update affected test.
>
> This makes its output consistent with `do_search_threads()' and
> `do_search_messages()'.
What do people think about this change? Personally I wi
On Fri, 1 Jul 2011 06:23:48 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote:
> Do not redirect test_emacs stderr to /dev/null. Test_emacs uses
> emacsclient(1) now and it does not print unwanted messages (like
> those from `message') to stderr. But it does print useful
> errors, e.g. when emacs server connection
On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 15:35:48 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> This modifies the notmuch-show "c i" binding to yank just the
> message-id to the kill-ring, without the "id:" prefix. This makes
> this yank binding consistent with the rest of the yank bindings in
> that they don't include any s
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 09:57:53 -0500, David Bremner wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jul 2011 06:23:48 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
> wrote:
> > Do not redirect test_emacs stderr to /dev/null. Test_emacs uses
> > emacsclient(1) now and it does not print unwanted messages (like
> > those from `message') to stderr.
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011 21:55:28 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> Buffer redisplay requires traversing the buffer's invisibility spec
> This change switches to using a single element buffer invisibility
> spec. To un-hide authors, instead of removing an entry from the
> invisibility spec, it simply re
On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 14:03:54 +0200, Thomas Jost wrote:
> - The first one adds a face for crypto parts headers, because a hardcoded blue
> foreground looks quite ugly with my color theme.
> - The second one creates a customizable notmuch-mua-switch-function, which is
> then passed to message-ma
Quoth David Bremner on Nov 12 at 11:13 am:
> On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 17:55:35 +0200, Pieter Praet wrote:
> > In order to be consistent with `notmuch-search-{add,remove}-tag' ("+"/"-"),
> > `notmuch-search-operate-all' ("*") should operate on matching threads
> > instead of matching messages.
> >
>
>
Hi.
I'm using notmuch together with a local dovecot imap server, and with
Gnus in Emacs.
When sending mails from notmuch, I'd like to be able to have a
nnimap+localdovecot:Sentmail added for instance, instead of a Fcc
header.
Is this possible ?
I can see one way which would be to hack a brutal
LGTM
Quoth Tomi Ollila on Nov 11 at 1:43 am:
> In the last line of run_emacs, exec the emacs process.
> With one fork less the process list is (also) neater.
> ---
> test/test-lib.sh |2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/test/test-lib.sh b/test/test-lib.
On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 17:55:35 +0200, Pieter Praet wrote:
> In order to be consistent with `notmuch-search-{add,remove}-tag' ("+"/"-"),
> `notmuch-search-operate-all' ("*") should operate on matching threads
> instead of matching messages.
>
As far as I can tell, the follow-up series for the race
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 11:57:22 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> Any junk bytes in sockaddr_in structure before passing that
> to bind() system call may cause problems.
> ---
Pushed the second version.
d
Quoth Tomi Ollila on Nov 12 at 12:02 pm:
> On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 21:49:41 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> > Good idea, but this introduces a dependency on netcat. Would it work
> > to simply kill the SMTP dummy?
>
> I cannot guarantee 6 nines of probability (but can guarantee as many eights
> as o
On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 10:20:29 +0200, Pieter Praet wrote:
> Alter `do_search_tags()' to prepend each result with `tag:',
> and update affected test.
>
> This makes its output consistent with `do_search_threads()' and
> `do_search_messages()'.
What do people think about this change? Personally I wi
On Fri, 1 Jul 2011 06:23:48 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
> Do not redirect test_emacs stderr to /dev/null. Test_emacs uses
> emacsclient(1) now and it does not print unwanted messages (like
> those from `message') to stderr. But it does print useful
> errors, e.g. when emacs server connectio
On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 15:35:48 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
> This modifies the notmuch-show "c i" binding to yank just the
> message-id to the kill-ring, without the "id:" prefix. This makes
> this yank binding consistent with the rest of the yank bindings in
> that they don't include any
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011 21:55:28 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> Buffer redisplay requires traversing the buffer's invisibility spec
> This change switches to using a single element buffer invisibility
> spec. To un-hide authors, instead of removing an entry from the
> invisibility spec, it simply re
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 11:57:22 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> Any junk bytes in sockaddr_in structure before passing that
> to bind() system call may cause problems.
> ---
Pushed the second version.
d
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://
Hi all.
Any objections to this trivial patch? Can we get it pushed?
Regards,
Dmitry
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 21:49:41 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> Good idea, but this introduces a dependency on netcat. Would it work
> to simply kill the SMTP dummy?
I cannot guarantee 6 nines of probability (but can guarantee as many eights
as one migh wish ;)
Socket buffering and timing might ca
Any junk bytes in sockaddr_in structure before passing that
to bind() system call may cause problems.
---
Thanks Austin. Consistent style matters... And dropped the peer_addr
setting after reading accept(2) namual page.
test/smtp-dummy.c |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 22:48:13 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> dtach is simpler than screen and is not setuid/setgid program so
> TMPDIR does not get cleared by dynamic loader when executed.
> ---
>
> Updated version after discussion with DmitryKurochkin and amdragon
> on IRC. Thank you.
>
Looks good
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 18:43:38 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 18:55:15 -0500, David Bremner
> wrote:
> At this point I actually think they're probably exactly the same
> audience, aren't they? Isn't nmbug primarily aimed at notmuch
> developers that are reading patches
48 matches
Mail list logo
