`Notmuch-wash-region-to-button' is the function that creates hidden
regions with buttons for signatures, citations and original messages.
Before the change, it did not work correctly if the to-be-hidden
region started at the beginning of a message: the visibility toggle
button was hidden as well.
The test is currently broken and will be fixed by a subsequent patch.
The patch adds a new file for tests of Emacs notmuch-show view.
Based on patch by David Edmondson [1].
[1] id:"1327562380-12894-4-git-send-email-...@dme.org"
---
test/emacs-show | 28
test/not
Changes since v1:
* rebase on the current master, just one trivial conflict so no need
for another round of review
Regards,
Dmitry
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
Oh, and I just noticed that Dmitry has already fixed this, probably in
a better way [1] (though I maintain that there still may be a problem
with the approach in general). I clearly haven't been following the
list closely enough this week.
[1] id:"1327926286-16680-1-git-send-email-dmitry.kurochki
On Fri, 3 Feb 2012 23:01:23 -0700, Adam Wolfe Gordon wrote:
> Oh, and I just noticed that Dmitry has already fixed this, probably in
> a better way [1] (though I maintain that there still may be a problem
> with the approach in general). I clearly haven't been following the
> list closely enough
Oh, and I just noticed that Dmitry has already fixed this, probably in
a better way [1] (though I maintain that there still may be a problem
with the approach in general). I clearly haven't been following the
list closely enough this week.
[1] id:"1327926286-16680-1-git-send-email-dmitry.kuroch..
On Thu, 2 Feb 2012 19:57:03 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> A new configuration key 'new.ignore' is used to determine which
> files and directories user wants not to be scanned as new mails.
>
This one needs to be rebased also. Maybe you can include some NEWS as
Austin suggests, preferably as a se
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:54:16 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote:
> ---
> emacs/notmuch.el |2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
Hi Dmitry.
This series stops applying at the second patch due to other changes, so
I guess I'll wait for a rebase of the full series. I've sent o
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:35:44 -0500, Allan Wind wrote:
> The function notmuch_database_find_message_by_filename now requires a
> notmuch_message_t and returns a notmuch_status_t. This
> change was introduced with 02a3076711, LIBNOTMUCH_VERSION_MAJOR = 2,
> version 0.9.
Hi Allan;
Thanks for all o
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:35:44 -0500, Allan Wind
wrote:
> The function notmuch_database_find_message_by_filename now requires a
> notmuch_message_t and returns a notmuch_status_t. This
> change was introduced with 02a3076711, LIBNOTMUCH_VERSION_MAJOR = 2,
> version 0.9.
Hi Allan;
Thanks for all
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:24:45 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
> The test is currently broken and will be fixed by a subsequent patch.
>
> The patch adds a new file for tests of Emacs notmuch-show view.
>
This patch needs to be rebased against master.
d
__
On Thu, 2 Feb 2012 19:57:03 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> A new configuration key 'new.ignore' is used to determine which
> files and directories user wants not to be scanned as new mails.
>
This one needs to be rebased also. Maybe you can include some NEWS as
Austin suggests, preferably as a se
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:24:45 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote:
> The test is currently broken and will be fixed by a subsequent patch.
>
> The patch adds a new file for tests of Emacs notmuch-show view.
>
This patch needs to be rebased against master.
d
Where to obtain notmuch 0.11.1
===
http://notmuchmail.org/releases/notmuch-0.11.1.tar.gz
Which can be verified with:
http://notmuchmail.org/releases/notmuch-0.11.1.tar.gz.sha1
05694ae8762076bf91d63b199e72a12e5ce012b0 notmuch-0.11.1.tar.gz
http://notmuchmail.org/
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:54:16 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
> ---
> emacs/notmuch.el |2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
Hi Dmitry.
This series stops applying at the second patch due to other changes, so
I guess I'll wait for a rebase of the full series. I've sent
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:01:15 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Jan 30, 2012 4:38 PM, "Tomi Ollila" wrote:
> >
> > > +
> > > +* Indent is 4 spaces with mixed tabs/spaces and a tab width of 8.
> > > + Tabs should be only at the beginning of the line.
> >
> > So, after initial indentation (with tabs)
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:01:15 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Jan 30, 2012 4:38 PM, "Tomi Ollila" wrote:
> >
> > > +
> > > +* Indent is 4 spaces with mixed tabs/spaces and a tab width of 8.
> > > + Tabs should be only at the beginning of the line.
> >
> > So, after initial indentation (with tabs)
Quoth Dmitry Kurochkin on Jan 31 at 3:37 am:
> On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:55:26 -0500, Austin Clements
> wrote:
> > This makes the text formatter take advantage of the new code
> > structure. The previously duplicated header logic is now unified,
> > several things that we used to compute repeatedl
On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 10:00:59 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> Hey, Dmitry. I'm so sorry I sent my last email on your original patch
> before I saw this new series. I do now like your original proposal
> better, since it shows the diff based the names the caller provides,
> which I now agree
On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 15:12:53 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> Files and directories which are specified in 'new.ignore' in the
> config file shouldn't be indexed nor reported by `notmuch new'.
>
> ---
> test/new | 23 +++
> 1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
>
On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:14:21 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 15:12:53 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> > Files and directories which are specified in 'new.ignore' in the
> > config file shouldn't be indexed nor reported by `notmuch new'.
> >
> > ---
>
> +1
>
> tested file order wi
Fix the bug in showing forwarded messages with no new text by not
hiding "original" messages if they are the entire message.
---
emacs/notmuch-wash.el |5 +++--
test/emacs|1 -
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/emacs/notmuch-wash.el b/emacs/notmuch-
Messages are sometimes forwarded with no new text in them, such
that the entire message looks like a top-posted reply with no reply
text. Showing such a message in emacs results in no message body
or button being inserted, so the buffer is empty except for headers.
---
test/emacs | 33 ++
Hi everyone,
I encountered today a bug that I remember being mentioned on IRC where
some messages are shown in emacs as completely empty, even though their
content is present and simple. For me, the bug shows up with messages that
have been forwarded by an Outlook user who didn't add any content t
Quoth Tomi Ollila on Feb 02 at 7:57 pm:
> A new configuration key 'new.ignore' is used to determine which
> files and directories user wants not to be scanned as new mails.
>
> Mark the corresponding test as no longer broken
> (test from id:"1328105573-4626-1-git-send-email-pieter at praet.org" )
Quoth Dmitry Kurochkin on Jan 31 at 3:37 am:
> On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 01:55:26 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> > This makes the text formatter take advantage of the new code
> > structure. The previously duplicated header logic is now unified,
> > several things that we used to compute repeatedly a
Messages are sometimes forwarded with no new text in them, such
that the entire message looks like a top-posted reply with no reply
text. Showing such a message in emacs results in no message body
or button being inserted, so the buffer is empty except for headers.
---
test/emacs | 33 ++
Fix the bug in showing forwarded messages with no new text by not
hiding "original" messages if they are the entire message.
---
emacs/notmuch-wash.el |5 +++--
test/emacs|1 -
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/emacs/notmuch-wash.el b/emacs/notmuch-
Hi everyone,
I encountered today a bug that I remember being mentioned on IRC where
some messages are shown in emacs as completely empty, even though their
content is present and simple. For me, the bug shows up with messages that
have been forwarded by an Outlook user who didn't add any content t
On Sat, 4 Feb 2012 00:41:08 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Use the new notmuch argument parser to handle arguments in "notmuch
> show". There are two corner case functional changes:
>
> 1) Also set params.raw = 1 when defaulting to raw format when part is
>requested but format is not specified
On Thu, 2 Feb 2012 19:57:03 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> A new configuration key 'new.ignore' is used to determine which
> files and directories user wants not to be scanned as new mails.
>
> Mark the corresponding test as no longer broken
> (test from id:"1328105573-4626-1-git-send-email-pieter
On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:26:33 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 08:58:46 -0400, David Bremner
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Folks;
> >
> > After some long delays, I am finally getting 0.11.1 out the door. I
> > have pushed an untagged release candidate to
> >
> > git://notmuchmail.org/git
On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:25:08 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:15:42 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> >
> > It appears some messages really enjoy the hospitality @ olra.theworths.org,
> > because they stick around and party for quite a while before moving to their
> > final destinat
On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 08:54:48 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 11:22:25 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
>
> > That mark was introduced in commit 03146f20, so isn't available in the
> > release branch yet. Let's just use `point-max' instead, merge 'release'
> > into 'master', and chan
On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 08:58:46 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
>
> Hi Folks;
>
> After some long delays, I am finally getting 0.11.1 out the door. I
> have pushed an untagged release candidate to
>
> git://notmuchmail.org/git/notmuch
> branch release
>
> encourage you to check it out (har har). I w
On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:15:42 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
>
> It appears some messages really enjoy the hospitality @ olra.theworths.org,
> because they stick around and party for quite a while before moving to their
> final destinations.
>
> Here's some examples:
>
> - id:"m28vkzoo8r.fsf at guru
On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 15:12:53 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> Files and directories which are specified in 'new.ignore' in the
> config file shouldn't be indexed nor reported by `notmuch new'.
>
> ---
> test/new | 23 +++
> 1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
>
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:29:06 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Modify the show view key bindings as follows to make them more
> consistent:
>
> 'a' = Archive current message, then move to next message, or show next
> thread from search if at the last message in thread.
>
> 'A' = Archive each message i
The last lines of notmuch_show_command() function were
unreachable. Fix it by using a variable for return value.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula
---
notmuch-show.c |8
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/notmuch-show.c b/notmuch-show.c
index f93e121..b18e279 10
Use the new notmuch argument parser to handle arguments in "notmuch
show". There are two corner case functional changes:
1) Also set params.raw = 1 when defaulting to raw format when part is
requested but format is not specified.
2) Do not set params.decrypt if crypto context creation fails.
On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:14:21 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 15:12:53 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> > Files and directories which are specified in 'new.ignore' in the
> > config file shouldn't be indexed nor reported by `notmuch new'.
> >
> > ---
>
> +1
>
> tested file order wi
Quoth Tomi Ollila on Feb 02 at 7:57 pm:
> A new configuration key 'new.ignore' is used to determine which
> files and directories user wants not to be scanned as new mails.
>
> Mark the corresponding test as no longer broken
> (test from id:"1328105573-4626-1-git-send-email-pie...@praet.org" ).
>
On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 11:20:58 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 03:09:39 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin gmail.com> wrote:
> > [...]
> > I would prefer to put the whole second argument inside the quotes, not
> > just the variable.
> > [...]
> >
>
> I felt the same way initially, but then
On Fri, 3 Feb 2012 13:12:25 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> As of commit b3caef1f, we're using g_array_unref() in 'lib/query.cc',
> which was only introduced in glib 2.22, so update the dependency.
>
> Thanks to datapipe at gmail.com for reporting this [1].
>
> Also see commit b88e6abc.
>
> [1] i
On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 15:12:53 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> Files and directories which are specified in 'new.ignore' in the
> config file shouldn't be indexed nor reported by `notmuch new'.
>
> ---
+1
tested file order with:
$ touch ~/mail/mails/a
$ touch ~/mail/mails/d
$ touch ~/mail/mails/o
Hi all,
There seems to be no way to get the "current" subject line of a thread.
I promised to relay my feature request to the list, so here it is..
This could be done using a parameter like "newest-or-original" for
`notmuch_thread_get_subject` in threads.cc,
which would look up the newest messag
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 16:35:10 +0100, Simon Campese wrote:
> Dear Community,
>
> I've got my own domain and when registering or shopping at some website,
> I always use email addresses of the form "websitename at mydomain.org", so
> for example I use "amazon at mydomain.org" when shopping at amazon
On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:04:05 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
> Actually, we can do both: check file name for consistent diff order
> (from expected to actual) and use file names that the caller provides.
>
> What do you think?
I'm not sure it's worth it, but I suppose that's fine.
jamie.
pgpD
se that's fine.
jamie.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20120203/26da6efa/attachment.pgp>
It appears some messages really enjoy the hospitality @ olra.theworths.org,
because they stick around and party for quite a while before moving to their
final destinations.
Here's some examples:
- id:"m28vkzoo8r.fsf at guru.guru-group.fi"
- rcv: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 05:33:56 -0800 (PST)
- fwd: T
As of commit b3caef1f, we're using g_array_unref() in 'lib/query.cc',
which was only introduced in glib 2.22, so update the dependency.
Thanks to datapipe at gmail.com for reporting this [1].
Also see commit b88e6abc.
[1] id:"alpine.DEB.2.02.1201132130220.21970 at ltspubuntu4.int.smq.datapipe.ne
Hi,
I just started using notmuch. It is fascinating, but I still need to
figure out a few things:
1. How can I restrict searches (eg of my inbox) to the last few
messages (eg 50-100) or some date (eg last 2 weeks)? I am using the
Emacs interface.
2. Could someone point me to some guides on wor
---
emacs/notmuch-mua.el |2 +-
test/emacs |2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/emacs/notmuch-mua.el b/emacs/notmuch-mua.el
index 3e93d7c..768b693 100644
--- a/emacs/notmuch-mua.el
+++ b/emacs/notmuch-mua.el
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ list."
;; proper
From: Aaron Ecay
Emacs message-mode uses certain text strings to indicate how to attach
files to outgoing mail. If these are present in the text of an email,
and a user is tricked into replying to the message, the user?s files
could be exposed.
Edited-by: Pieter Praet : Rebased to release bran
From: Aaron Ecay
The test is broken at this time; the next commit will introduce a fix.
Edited-by: Pieter Praet :
Rebased to release branch, moved expected output into the actual test,
and fixed "Fcc:" line.
---
test/emacs | 21 +
1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 0 d
On Thu, 2 Feb 2012 00:01:31 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> I rebased these against branch release (and copied a comment from
> aaron's email), but the test fails there, as does the reply within emacs test.
>
Same issue here.
That mark was introduced in commit 03146f20, so isn't available in th
On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 03:09:39 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote:
> [...]
> I would prefer to put the whole second argument inside the quotes, not
> just the variable.
> [...]
>
I felt the same way initially, but then decided to leave the extra
quotes in place because the resulting fontification helps
result.
Any chance of a reviewer for this piece?
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20120203/ba271a66/attachment.pgp>
On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 09:36:29 +, Mark Walters
wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 08:48:27 +, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:24:56 +, Mark Walters > gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 01:07:59 +0200, Jani Nikula
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:27:36 +00
On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 08:48:27 +, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:24:56 +, Mark Walters gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 01:07:59 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > > On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:27:36 +, Mark Walters > > gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:55:3
Hi Folks;
After some long delays, I am finally getting 0.11.1 out the door. I
have pushed an untagged release candidate to
git://notmuchmail.org/git/notmuch
branch release
encourage you to check it out (har har). I will probably tag and release
in about 12hours, all going well.
d
On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 11:22:25 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> That mark was introduced in commit 03146f20, so isn't available in the
> release branch yet. Let's just use `point-max' instead, merge 'release'
> into 'master', and change it back to `mark' there. It's better to break
> MML tags in the
On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:24:56 +, Mark Walters
wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 01:07:59 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:27:36 +, Mark Walters > gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:55:33 +0200, Jani Nikula
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Mark -
> > > >
> >
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20120203/8a478c71/attachment.pgp>
+1.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20120203/9a0f35df/attachment.pgp>
would have
the effect of disabling the current 'isearch can open closed messages'
behaviour.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://not
t part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20120203/1336ae5c/attachment.pgp>
On Thu, 2 Feb 2012 19:57:03 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> A new configuration key 'new.ignore' is used to determine which
> files and directories user wants not to be scanned as new mails.
>
> Mark the corresponding test as no longer broken
> (test from id:"1328105573-4626-1-git-send-email-pie...@
On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:26:33 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 08:58:46 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> >
> > Hi Folks;
> >
> > After some long delays, I am finally getting 0.11.1 out the door. I
> > have pushed an untagged release candidate to
> >
> > git://notmuchmail.org/git/no
On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:25:08 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:15:42 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> >
> > It appears some messages really enjoy the hospitality @ olra.theworths.org,
> > because they stick around and party for quite a while before moving to their
> > final destinat
On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 08:54:48 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 11:22:25 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
>
> > That mark was introduced in commit 03146f20, so isn't available in the
> > release branch yet. Let's just use `point-max' instead, merge 'release'
> > into 'master', and chan
Hi all,
There seems to be no way to get the "current" subject line of a thread.
I promised to relay my feature request to the list, so here it is..
This could be done using a parameter like "newest-or-original" for
`notmuch_thread_get_subject` in threads.cc,
which would look up the newest messag
On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 10:00:59 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
> Hey, Dmitry. I'm so sorry I sent my last email on your original patch
> before I saw this new series. I do now like your original proposal
> better, since it shows the diff based the names the caller provides,
> which I now agre
On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 08:58:46 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
>
> Hi Folks;
>
> After some long delays, I am finally getting 0.11.1 out the door. I
> have pushed an untagged release candidate to
>
> git://notmuchmail.org/git/notmuch
> branch release
>
> encourage you to check it out (har har). I w
On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:15:42 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
>
> It appears some messages really enjoy the hospitality @ olra.theworths.org,
> because they stick around and party for quite a while before moving to their
> final destinations.
>
> Here's some examples:
>
> - id:"m28vkzoo8r@guru.gu
Hi Folks;
After some long delays, I am finally getting 0.11.1 out the door. I
have pushed an untagged release candidate to
git://notmuchmail.org/git/notmuch
branch release
encourage you to check it out (har har). I will probably tag and release
in about 12hours, all going well.
d
On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 11:22:25 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> That mark was introduced in commit 03146f20, so isn't available in the
> release branch yet. Let's just use `point-max' instead, merge 'release'
> into 'master', and change it back to `mark' there. It's better to break
> MML tags in the
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:29:06 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Modify the show view key bindings as follows to make them more
> consistent:
>
> 'a' = Archive current message, then move to next message, or show next
> thread from search if at the last message in thread.
>
> 'A' = Archive each message i
On Fri, 3 Feb 2012 13:12:25 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> As of commit b3caef1f, we're using g_array_unref() in 'lib/query.cc',
> which was only introduced in glib 2.22, so update the dependency.
>
> Thanks to datap...@gmail.com for reporting this [1].
>
> Also see commit b88e6abc.
>
> [1] id:"
Hi Jameson.
On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 10:00:59 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> Hey, Dmitry. I'm so sorry I sent my last email on your original patch
> before I saw this new series.
No problems.
> I do now like your original proposal
> better, since it shows the diff based the names the caller
It appears some messages really enjoy the hospitality @ olra.theworths.org,
because they stick around and party for quite a while before moving to their
final destinations.
Here's some examples:
- id:"m28vkzoo8r@guru.guru-group.fi"
- rcv: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 05:33:56 -0800 (PST)
- fwd: Thu,
As of commit b3caef1f, we're using g_array_unref() in 'lib/query.cc',
which was only introduced in glib 2.22, so update the dependency.
Thanks to datap...@gmail.com for reporting this [1].
Also see commit b88e6abc.
[1] id:"alpine.deb.2.02.1201132130220.21...@ltspubuntu4.int.smq.datapipe.net"
---
On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 15:12:53 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> Files and directories which are specified in 'new.ignore' in the
> config file shouldn't be indexed nor reported by `notmuch new'.
>
> ---
+1
tested file order with:
$ touch ~/mail/mails/a
$ touch ~/mail/mails/d
$ touch ~/mail/mails/o
Hi,
I just started using notmuch. It is fascinating, but I still need to
figure out a few things:
1. How can I restrict searches (eg of my inbox) to the last few
messages (eg 50-100) or some date (eg last 2 weeks)? I am using the
Emacs interface.
2. Could someone point me to some guides on wor
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 16:35:10 +0100, Simon Campese
wrote:
> Dear Community,
>
> I've got my own domain and when registering or shopping at some website,
> I always use email addresses of the form "websiten...@mydomain.org", so
> for example I use "ama...@mydomain.org" when shopping at amazon. The
On Thu, 2 Feb 2012 11:23:46 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> Re-work the existing crypto switch toggle to be based on a persistant
> buffer-local variable.
>
> To allow this, modify `notmuch-show-refresh-view' to erase and re-draw
> in the current buffer rather than killing the current buffer and
On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 11:20:58 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 03:09:39 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
> wrote:
> > [...]
> > I would prefer to put the whole second argument inside the quotes, not
> > just the variable.
> > [...]
> >
>
> I felt the same way initially, but then decided
---
emacs/notmuch-mua.el |2 +-
test/emacs |2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/emacs/notmuch-mua.el b/emacs/notmuch-mua.el
index 3e93d7c..768b693 100644
--- a/emacs/notmuch-mua.el
+++ b/emacs/notmuch-mua.el
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ list."
;; proper
From: Aaron Ecay
Emacs message-mode uses certain text strings to indicate how to attach
files to outgoing mail. If these are present in the text of an email,
and a user is tricked into replying to the message, the user’s files
could be exposed.
Edited-by: Pieter Praet : Rebased to release bran
From: Aaron Ecay
The test is broken at this time; the next commit will introduce a fix.
Edited-by: Pieter Praet :
Rebased to release branch, moved expected output into the actual test,
and fixed "Fcc:" line.
---
test/emacs | 21 +
1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 0 d
On Thu, 2 Feb 2012 00:01:31 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> I rebased these against branch release (and copied a comment from
> aaron's email), but the test fails there, as does the reply within emacs test.
>
Same issue here.
That mark was introduced in commit 03146f20, so isn't available in th
On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 03:09:39 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
> [...]
> I would prefer to put the whole second argument inside the quotes, not
> just the variable.
> [...]
>
I felt the same way initially, but then decided to leave the extra
quotes in place because the resulting fontification help
On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 09:36:29 +, Mark Walters
wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 08:48:27 +, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:24:56 +, Mark Walters
> > wrote:
> > > On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 01:07:59 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:27:36 +, Mark Walter
On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 08:48:27 +, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:24:56 +, Mark Walters
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 01:07:59 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > > On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:27:36 +, Mark Walters
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:55:33 +0200, Jani Ni
On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:35:10 +, Mark Walters
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 00:08:32 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > On Thu, 2 Feb 2012 17:43:36 +, Mark Walters > gmail.com> wrote:
> > > This adds the excludes to notmuch-show.c. We do not exclude when only
> > > a single message (or par
On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:27:36 +, Mark Walters
wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:55:33 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >
> > Hi Mark -
> >
> > This is my first look at any version of the series; apologies if I'm
> > clueless about some details... Please find some comments below.
> >
> > BR,
> > J
On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:24:56 +, Mark Walters
wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 01:07:59 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:27:36 +, Mark Walters
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 23:55:33 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Mark -
> > > >
> > > > This is my
On Thu, 2 Feb 2012 17:43:39 +, Mark Walters
wrote:
> +(when (eq (point) (point-max))
"(when (eobp)" is more usual.
> + (goto-char (point-min))
> + (notmuch-show-next-matching-message))
Otherwise the Emacs patch looks good.
pgpVoJXXr3AmO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_
+1.
pgpST9LyTvG5L.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
On Thu, 2 Feb 2012 17:43:36 +, Mark Walters
wrote:
> This adds the excludes to notmuch-show.c. We do not exclude when only
> a single message (or part) is requested. notmuch-show will output the
> exclude information when either text or json format is requested. As
> this changes the output
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
