Hi
I looked at this and think its ok except for one trivial (but
significant) rebase error.
Best wishes
Mark
On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 08:46:16 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> Except for where invisibility is involved, replace the use of overlays
> in `notmuch-show-mode' with text properties,
Hi
> Here is the latest version of this patch set. I think I have fixed most
> of the problems raised in review but there are some remaining issues
> detailed below.
I know this patch set needs rebasing on top of Jani's notmuch-show
command line parsing patch: should I do that now or wait for
Quoth Jameson Graef Rollins on Feb 11 at 10:44 am:
> On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 18:39:48 +, Mark Walters gmail.com> wrote:
> > This option turns off the exclusion so all matching messages are
> > returned. We do not need to add this to show as notmuch-show does not
> > (yet) exclude.
>
> Hi. What
Hello, I'd just like to start by saying I've found NotMuch to be VERY
useful in handling years worth of email archives and appreciate all the
hard work every developer has put into it.
I have written up a port for FreeBSD and would like to have it added to
the official ports collection.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20120211/1390421f/attachment.pgp>
includes what are essentially
multiple separate threads.
jamie.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20120
> Yeah, I think this is the point: you want "*@mydomain.org" to be one of
> the user.other_email. I don't see why that couldn't be done with a
> little work in notmuch-reply.c. I wouldn't mind seeing this
> functionality as well, actually.
So here's my shabby solution (pasted from my .emacs):
On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 18:39:48 +, Mark Walters markwalters1...@gmail.com
wrote:
This option turns off the exclusion so all matching messages are
returned. We do not need to add this to show as notmuch-show does not
(yet) exclude.
Hi. What is the status of this patch? It looks like we're
Quoth Jameson Graef Rollins on Feb 11 at 10:44 am:
On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 18:39:48 +, Mark Walters markwalters1...@gmail.com
wrote:
This option turns off the exclusion so all matching messages are
returned. We do not need to add this to show as notmuch-show does not
(yet) exclude.
Hi.
On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:50:23 -0500, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
It has moved to a new thread: id:874nv9rv79@qmul.ac.uk. It's
waiting for a rebase on Jani's command line parsing change and
probably needs some more review, too.
So it has! Thanks, Austin.
jamie.
Hi
Here is the latest version of this patch set. I think I have fixed most
of the problems raised in review but there are some remaining issues
detailed below.
I know this patch set needs rebasing on top of Jani's notmuch-show
command line parsing patch: should I do that now or wait for
Hello, I'd just like to start by saying I've found NotMuch to be VERY
useful in handling years worth of email archives and appreciate all the
hard work every developer has put into it.
I have written up a port for FreeBSD and would like to have it added to
the official ports collection.
Hi
I looked at this and think its ok except for one trivial (but
significant) rebase error.
Best wishes
Mark
On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 08:46:16 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
Except for where invisibility is involved, replace the use of overlays
in `notmuch-show-mode' with text
13 matches
Mail list logo
