On Mon, 09 Jul 2012, Austin Clements wrote:
> This fixes the docstings for notmuch-json-read and notmuch-json-eof as
> suggested by Mark. No other changes.
This is a definite +1 from me:
It all seems to work perfectly, and fixes a definite bug (and makes it
easy to fix some other bugs when cha
This patch uses the previously introduced structured format printer in
notmuch-search.
Most of this patch is necessary to keep the text output unchanged. All tests
pass, both text and JSON are printed exactly the same as they were before.
---
notmuch-search.c | 275 +
This formatter prints exactly the same structure as the existing JSON
formatter, but uses the newly introduced structured formatting primitives.
---
structured-output.c | 159 +++
structured-output.h | 48
2 files changed, 207 in
This patch adds a new type structure_printer, which is used for structured
formatting, e.g. JSON or S-Expressions.
The structure contains the following function pointers:
- initial_state: is called to create a state object, that is passed to all
invocations. This should be used to keep track of
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012, craven at gmx.net wrote:
> As discussed in , this patch adds
> support for new structured output formats (like s-expressions) by using
> stateful structure_printers. An implementation of the JSON structure
> printer that passes all tests is included. The output for JSON (and
>
I have been thinking a little bit about the current situation with
regards to tests. There are quite a lot of tests in the review queue
that have been there for quite some time without much interest, but I do
think we are rather short of tests. (*)
I wonder if we could have a sort of staging area
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 10:04:10 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10 2012, Mark Walters wrote:
> > I think I would also add something saying that the text format is just
> > different (and that a significant chunk of the patch is just that).
>
> Can we not just dump this output form
to run
notmuch new on its own.
If your tagging setup is really complicated, you could have some-tag in
new.tags config, and bail out early if notmuch count tag:some-tag outputs 0
(and obviously notmuch tag -some-tag tag:some-tag later in the script).
Just a thought.
J.
>
> -s
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20120710/c069b7cf/attachment.html>
As far as I can tell, notmuch doesn't integrate as smoothly with bbdb as older
emacs mailclients. I'm especially looking for a snarf function that
distinguishes sender from recipient.
How do other people use bbdb with notmuch?
Does anyone have lisp code like that which ships with bbdb for other
As far as I can tell, notmuch doesn't integrate as smoothly with bbdb as older
emacs mailclients. I'm especially looking for a snarf function that
distinguishes sender from recipient.
How do other people use bbdb with notmuch?
Does anyone have lisp code like that which ships with bbdb for other
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 10:04:10 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10 2012, Mark Walters wrote:
> > I think I would also add something saying that the text format is just
> > different (and that a significant chunk of the patch is just that).
>
> Can we not just dump this output for
As discussed in , this patch adds
support for new structured output formats (like s-expressions) by using
stateful structure_printers. An implementation of the JSON structure
printer that passes all tests is included. The output for JSON (and
text) is identical to the current output. S-Expressions
The initial nmbug-status was pretty consistent in it's whitespacing
but a few lines had some leftover slips. Those are now "corrected".
Also, most of the code used ' as quoting char. As in Python one can
use ' and " interchangeably some code used " instead of '. However
the usage of those were inc
Since it would be great to use the structure printer for show as well,
it would make sense to put it in its own source file, where it can
easily be shared between commands.
There are a few systematic code formatting problems in your patch. To
be consistent with other notmuch code, there should be
> notmuch-search.c | 453
> +++
> 1 file changed, 326 insertions(+), 127 deletions(-)
Hi for such a large patch this was surprisingly easy to follow (though I
am not saying I have worked through all the details). However, there are
some prelim
Quoth Jameson Graef Rollins on Jul 10 at 10:04 am:
> On Tue, Jul 10 2012, Mark Walters wrote:
> > I think I would also add something saying that the text format is just
> > different (and that a significant chunk of the patch is just that).
>
> Can we not just dump this output format once and for
Sorry, the original patch I sent was missing a small part, here the full
patch:
As discussed in , this patch adds
support for new structured output formats (like s-expressions) by using
stateful structure_printers. An implementation of the JSON structure
printer that passes all tests is included.
Since it would be great to use the structure printer for show as well,
it would make sense to put it in its own source file, where it can
easily be shared between commands.
There are a few systematic code formatting problems in your patch. To
be consistent with other notmuch code, there should be
Hi,
Sounds great!
https://speedee.bugsplat.info/#search/ruby throws at me:
NoMethodError at /
undefined method `close' for nil:NilClass
file: app.rb
location: block in
line: 16
Looking forward to play with you demo :)
Thanks!
~ elf Pavlik ~
Excerpts from Peter Keen's message of
As discussed in , this patch adds
support for new structured output formats (like s-expressions) by using
stateful structure_printers. An implementation of the JSON structure
printer that passes all tests is included.
Structure printers have functions for starting a map, a list, closing
any number
was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20120710/8e3e0334/attachment.pgp>
This patch uses the previously introduced structured format printer in
notmuch-search.
Most of this patch is necessary to keep the text output unchanged. All tests
pass, both text and JSON are printed exactly the same as they were before.
---
notmuch-search.c | 275 +
This formatter prints exactly the same structure as the existing JSON
formatter, but uses the newly introduced structured formatting primitives.
---
structured-output.c | 159 +++
structured-output.h | 48
2 files changed, 207 in
This patch adds a new type structure_printer, which is used for structured
formatting, e.g. JSON or S-Expressions.
The structure contains the following function pointers:
- initial_state: is called to create a state object, that is passed to all
invocations. This should be used to keep track of
On Tue, Jul 10 2012, Austin Clements wrote:
> Quoth Jameson Graef Rollins on Jul 10 at 10:04 am:
>> On Tue, Jul 10 2012, Mark Walters wrote:
>> > I think I would also add something saying that the text format is just
>> > different (and that a significant chunk of the patch is just that).
>>
>>
ut. You're right that the text search output is more widely used.
jamie.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20120710/1889c9ec/attachment.pgp>
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012, cra...@gmx.net wrote:
> As discussed in , this patch adds
> support for new structured output formats (like s-expressions) by using
> stateful structure_printers. An implementation of the JSON structure
> printer that passes all tests is included. The output for JSON (and
> tex
Quoth Jameson Graef Rollins on Jul 10 at 10:04 am:
> On Tue, Jul 10 2012, Mark Walters wrote:
> > I think I would also add something saying that the text format is just
> > different (and that a significant chunk of the patch is just that).
>
> Can we not just dump this output format once and for
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 7:14 AM, Peter Keen wrote:
> let me know what you think!
This is awesome, I love it!
On Tue, Jul 10 2012, Mark Walters wrote:
> I think I would also add something saying that the text format is just
> different (and that a significant chunk of the patch is just that).
Can we not just dump this output format once and for all? Does anything
use it? And if so can we just modify it
modify it to use a more sensible format?
jamie.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20120710/05948522/attachment.pgp>
On Tue, Jul 10 2012, cra...@gmx.net wrote:
> Sorry, the original patch I sent was missing a small part, here the full
> patch:
>
> As discussed in , this patch adds
> support for new structured output formats (like s-expressions) by using
> stateful structure_printers. An implementation of the JSON
re
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20120710/74c64ff7/attachment.pgp>
I have been thinking a little bit about the current situation with
regards to tests. There are quite a lot of tests in the review queue
that have been there for quite some time without much interest, but I do
think we are rather short of tests. (*)
I wonder if we could have a sort of staging area
On Tue, Jul 10 2012, Sebastien Binet wrote:
> ok. I thought using the post-new hook would have saved some i/o
> resources over my current setup:
> offlineimap.postsynchook = ~/emacs/notmuch-lib/notmuch-tag.sh
>
> where notmuch-tag.sh is (in pseudo-code):
> ##
> /usr/bin/notmuch new
>
> for tag,qu
-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20120710/f68c2784/attachment.pgp>
r when you switch to it. There's no point in displaying the refresh
message when you don't also switch to the buffer, is there? And this way
you'll get the diff between the manual (through user interaction) refreshes
of the buffer, not between two cron jobs.
J.
------ next part ---
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 5:08 AM, elf Pavlik
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sounds great!
>
> https://speedee.bugsplat.info/#search/ruby throws at me:
>
> NoMethodError at /
> undefined method `close' for nil:NilClass
>
> file: app.rb
> location: block in
> line: 16
>
> Looking forward to play with
scrubbed...
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20120710/f0282786/attachment.html>
As discussed in , this patch adds
support for new structured output formats (like s-expressions) by using
stateful structure_printers. An implementation of the JSON structure
printer that passes all tests is included. The output for JSON (and
text) is identical to the current output. S-Expressions
On Jul 10, 2012 12:59 PM, "Sebastien Binet" wrote:
>
> Jani Nikula writes:
>
> > On Jul 9, 2012 8:12 PM, "Jameson Graef Rollins" <
jroll...@finestructure.net>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jul 09 2012, Sebastien Binet wrote:
> >> > hum... is post-new supposed to be run even if there is no new
mes
> notmuch-search.c | 453
> +++
> 1 file changed, 326 insertions(+), 127 deletions(-)
Hi for such a large patch this was surprisingly easy to follow (though I
am not saying I have worked through all the details). However, there are
some prelim
Hi,
Sounds great!
https://speedee.bugsplat.info/#search/ruby throws at me:
NoMethodError at /
undefined method `close' for nil:NilClass
file: app.rb
location: block in
line: 16
Looking forward to play with you demo :)
Thanks!
~ elf Pavlik ~
Excerpts from Peter Keen's message of
Sorry, the original patch I sent was missing a small part, here the full
patch:
As discussed in , this patch adds
support for new structured output formats (like s-expressions) by using
stateful structure_printers. An implementation of the JSON structure
printer that passes all tests is included.
As discussed in , this patch adds
support for new structured output formats (like s-expressions) by using
stateful structure_printers. An implementation of the JSON structure
printer that passes all tests is included.
Structure printers have functions for starting a map, a list, closing
any number
Jani Nikula writes:
> On Jul 9, 2012 8:12 PM, "Jameson Graef Rollins"
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 09 2012, Sebastien Binet wrote:
>> > hum... is post-new supposed to be run even if there is no new message ?
>>
>> Hi, Sebastian. Yes, I think it runs regardless if there are any new
>> messages or
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 7:14 AM, Peter Keen wrote:
> let me know what you think!
This is awesome, I love it!
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
On Mon, Jul 09 2012, Peter Keen wrote:
> Over the weekend I threw together the prototype for a web-based notmuch
> client named Speedee. It's a little Ruby webapp with a Backbone.js front
> end, using Twitter Bootstrap and a free theme from Bootswatch. It doesn't
> do much yet. Basically, it can l
g and coloring
in the show pages, but it's a really nice simple platform to start with.
Very nice.
Looking forward to watching it develop!
jamie.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
De
On Mon, Jul 09 2012, "Bryant, Daniel B." wrote:
> I was able to get signature verification working with your patchset
> (with a caveat) but not decryption.
Hi, Daniel. I guess I'm only partially happy to hear that! I
definitely do appreciate the feedback, though.
> The caveat is that GMime is
r some tests
that include messages encrypted according to this RFC? I think adding
some tests to the test/crypto script would be a great place to start.
jamie.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20120710/7606e81b/attachment-0001.pgp>
51 matches
Mail list logo
