[PATCH] test: add nontrivial test for restore --accumulate.

david at tethera.net writes: > From: David Bremner > > It seems we have never tested the case that restore --accumulate > actually adds tags. I noticed this when I started optimizing and no > tests failed. > > I also had to modify the next test. Perhaps a seperate patch could > make these tests

[PATCH 1/1] Fixed 2 misspellings of word 'separate'

"Seperate: The second most common misspelling on the Internet..." (from http://www.re-vision.com/spelling/separate.html). s/seperate/separate/ in debian/NEWS.Debian & test/README done. --- debian/NEWS.Debian | 3 +-- test/README| 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

[PATCH 1/1] Fixed 2 misspellings of word 'separate'

Tomi Ollila writes: > "Seperate: The second most common misspelling on the Internet..." > (from http://www.re-vision.com/spelling/separate.html). > > s/seperate/separate/ in debian/NEWS.Debian & test/README done. For the record, only one of those typoes was mine ;) pushed. d

[PATCH v3] contrib: pick: bugfix when trying to show a non-message

Mark Walters writes: > If the user pressed return on the end result status line it gave a > blank message. Modify the function notmuch-pick-get-message-id to > return nil rather than an empty message-id in this case to fix this. pushed, d

[PATCH] Update notmuch-mutt requirements in README file.

"Kevin J. McCarthy" writes: > This updates the notmuch-mutt README file with requirements for the > recently added duplicate removal patch. > > -Kevin Pushed to master. Sorry about the delay, the contrib patches sortof dropped off my radar, but that should be fixed now. d

[PATCH v2 1/1] NEWS (for 0.15): Added note about Bcc & Reply-To headers in json output

notmuch show --format json now includes Bcc and Reply-To headers of the message. Mention that in NEWS. (Heavily modified version of text originally from Michal Nazarewicz.) --- V2 of id:1352997830-1793-1-git-send-email-tomi.ollila at iki.fi fixed the nitpick in id:2012111521.GV22284 at

[PATCH v3 00/10] Solaris support

On Thu, Nov 15 2012, Blake Jones wrote: >> $ gcc compat/have_strsep.c >> compat/have_strsep.c: In function "main": >> compat/have_strsep.c:7:21: error: expected identifier or "(" before "const" >> compat/have_strsep.c:9:29: error: "delim" undeclared (first use in this >> function) >>

Uncrustify on notmuch-restore.c, notmuch-dump.c and notmuch-tag.c

david at tethera.net writes: > Here is the result of running uncrustify on 3 files affected by an > upcoming patch series. It makes easier to make sure my new code is > reasonable styled if the whole file is uncrustify clean. Pushed, d

[PATCH] test: add nontrivial test for restore --accumulate.

From: David Bremner It seems we have never tested the case that restore --accumulate actually adds tags. I noticed this when I started optimizing and no tests failed. I also had to modify the next test. Perhaps a seperate patch could make these tests more independent of the

[PATCH v2 1/1] NEWS (for 0.15): Added note about Bcc & Reply-To headers in json output

Tomi Ollila writes: > notmuch show --format json now includes Bcc and Reply-To headers of > the message. Mention that in NEWS. > (Heavily modified version of text originally from Michal Nazarewicz.) pushed.

[PATCH v2 1/1] NEWS (for 0.15): Added note about Bcc Reply-To headers in json output

notmuch show --format json now includes Bcc and Reply-To headers of the message. Mention that in NEWS. (Heavily modified version of text originally from Michal Nazarewicz.) --- V2 of id:1352997830-1793-1-git-send-email-tomi.oll...@iki.fi fixed the nitpick in id:2012111521.gv22...@mit.edu ;)

Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] NEWS (for 0.15): Added note about Bcc Reply-To headers in json output

Tomi Ollila tomi.oll...@iki.fi writes: notmuch show --format json now includes Bcc and Reply-To headers of the message. Mention that in NEWS. (Heavily modified version of text originally from Michal Nazarewicz.) pushed. ___ notmuch mailing list

Re: Uncrustify on notmuch-restore.c, notmuch-dump.c and notmuch-tag.c

da...@tethera.net writes: Here is the result of running uncrustify on 3 files affected by an upcoming patch series. It makes easier to make sure my new code is reasonable styled if the whole file is uncrustify clean. Pushed, d ___ notmuch mailing

Re: [PATCH 1/1] Fixed 2 misspellings of word 'separate'

Tomi Ollila tomi.oll...@iki.fi writes: Seperate: The second most common misspelling on the Internet... (from http://www.re-vision.com/spelling/separate.html). s/seperate/separate/ in debian/NEWS.Debian test/README done. For the record, only one of those typoes was mine ;) pushed. d

Re: [PATCH] test: add nontrivial test for restore --accumulate.

da...@tethera.net writes: From: David Bremner brem...@debian.org It seems we have never tested the case that restore --accumulate actually adds tags. I noticed this when I started optimizing and no tests failed. I also had to modify the next test. Perhaps a seperate patch could make these