From: David Bremner
Unfortunately old versions of GCC and clang do not provide byte order
macros, so we re-invent them.
If UTIL_BYTE_ORDER is not defined or defined to 0, we fall back to
macros supported by recent versions of GCC and clang
---
I think I got all of Tomi's
On Tue, Nov 26 2013, david at tethera.net wrote:
> From: David Bremner
>
> Unfortunately old versions of GCC and clang do not provide byte order
> macros, so we re-invent them.
Brief comments inline :D
>
> If UTIL_BYTE_ORDER is not defined, we fall back to macros supported by
> recent versions
Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes:
> i notice that in the current master, debian/notmuch-emacs.README.Debian
> contains the following stanza:
>
>
> * This package currently works only with emacs 23. Users of
> pre-release snapshots of emacs 24 can expect problems.
>
>
>
From: David Bremner
Unfortunately old versions of GCC and clang do not provide byte order
macros, so we re-invent them.
If UTIL_BYTE_ORDER is not defined, we fall back to macros supported by
recent versions of GCC and clang
---
I pushed the series
From: David Bremner da...@tethera.net
Unfortunately old versions of GCC and clang do not provide byte order
macros, so we re-invent them.
If UTIL_BYTE_ORDER is not defined, we fall back to macros supported by
recent versions of GCC and clang
---
I pushed the series
Daniel Kahn Gillmor d...@fifthhorseman.net writes:
i notice that in the current master, debian/notmuch-emacs.README.Debian
contains the following stanza:
* This package currently works only with emacs 23. Users of
pre-release snapshots of emacs 24 can expect problems.
On Tue, Nov 26 2013, da...@tethera.net wrote:
From: David Bremner da...@tethera.net
Unfortunately old versions of GCC and clang do not provide byte order
macros, so we re-invent them.
Brief comments inline :D
If UTIL_BYTE_ORDER is not defined, we fall back to macros supported by
recent
From: David Bremner da...@tethera.net
Unfortunately old versions of GCC and clang do not provide byte order
macros, so we re-invent them.
If UTIL_BYTE_ORDER is not defined or defined to 0, we fall back to
macros supported by recent versions of GCC and clang
---
I think I got all of Tomi's
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 4:13 PM, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote:
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com writes:
Please do. It's one of the things I'm waiting for before a feature
freeze for 0.17
Sorry I forgot, it's pushed now.
OK, thanks. Anything you want to add to the NEWS