[PATCH v2] util: detect byte order

2013-11-26 Thread da...@tethera.net
From: David Bremner Unfortunately old versions of GCC and clang do not provide byte order macros, so we re-invent them. If UTIL_BYTE_ORDER is not defined or defined to 0, we fall back to macros supported by recent versions of GCC and clang --- I think I got all of Tomi's

[PATCH] util: detect byte order

2013-11-26 Thread Tomi Ollila
On Tue, Nov 26 2013, david at tethera.net wrote: > From: David Bremner > > Unfortunately old versions of GCC and clang do not provide byte order > macros, so we re-invent them. Brief comments inline :D > > If UTIL_BYTE_ORDER is not defined, we fall back to macros supported by > recent versions

emacs compatibility?

2013-11-26 Thread David Bremner
Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes: > i notice that in the current master, debian/notmuch-emacs.README.Debian > contains the following stanza: > > > * This package currently works only with emacs 23. Users of > pre-release snapshots of emacs 24 can expect problems. > > >

[PATCH] util: detect byte order

2013-11-26 Thread da...@tethera.net
From: David Bremner Unfortunately old versions of GCC and clang do not provide byte order macros, so we re-invent them. If UTIL_BYTE_ORDER is not defined, we fall back to macros supported by recent versions of GCC and clang --- I pushed the series

[PATCH] util: detect byte order

2013-11-26 Thread david
From: David Bremner da...@tethera.net Unfortunately old versions of GCC and clang do not provide byte order macros, so we re-invent them. If UTIL_BYTE_ORDER is not defined, we fall back to macros supported by recent versions of GCC and clang --- I pushed the series

Re: emacs compatibility?

2013-11-26 Thread David Bremner
Daniel Kahn Gillmor d...@fifthhorseman.net writes: i notice that in the current master, debian/notmuch-emacs.README.Debian contains the following stanza: * This package currently works only with emacs 23. Users of pre-release snapshots of emacs 24 can expect problems.

Re: [PATCH] util: detect byte order

2013-11-26 Thread Tomi Ollila
On Tue, Nov 26 2013, da...@tethera.net wrote: From: David Bremner da...@tethera.net Unfortunately old versions of GCC and clang do not provide byte order macros, so we re-invent them. Brief comments inline :D If UTIL_BYTE_ORDER is not defined, we fall back to macros supported by recent

[PATCH v2] util: detect byte order

2013-11-26 Thread david
From: David Bremner da...@tethera.net Unfortunately old versions of GCC and clang do not provide byte order macros, so we re-invent them. If UTIL_BYTE_ORDER is not defined or defined to 0, we fall back to macros supported by recent versions of GCC and clang --- I think I got all of Tomi's

Re: [PATCH 00/21] vim: general updates

2013-11-26 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 4:13 PM, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote: Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com writes: Please do. It's one of the things I'm waiting for before a feature freeze for 0.17 Sorry I forgot, it's pushed now. OK, thanks. Anything you want to add to the NEWS