From: Mark Walters
The unread/read changes will use the post-command-hook. test_emacs
does not call the post-command-hook. This adds a notmuch-test-progn
which takes a list of commands as argument and executes them in turn
but runs the post-command-hook after each one.
The caller can batch opera
Probably because I kept using notmuch-emacs .elc code from 0.16 after
notmuch got upgraded to 0.17 (I rarely restart emacs), my Emacs
interface to notmuch started generating queries that caused Xapian
exceptions and segfaults. Here's one:
$ notmuch show '( FW: Student Employment Orie.. )'
A X
Probably because I kept using notmuch-emacs .elc code from 0.16 after
notmuch got upgraded to 0.17 (I rarely restart emacs), my Emacs
interface to notmuch started generating queries that caused Xapian
exceptions and segfaults. Here's one:
$ notmuch show '( FW: Student Employment Orie.. )'
A X
> tag:muted)
>
> and of course that can be done in a post-new script or equivalent.
>
> d
> ___
> notmuch mailing list
> notmuch at notmuchmail.org
> http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
>
-- next part ---
From: Mark Walters
The unread/read changes will use the post-command-hook. test_emacs
does not call the post-command-hook. This adds a notmuch-test-progn
which takes a list of commands as argument and executes them in turn
but runs the post-command-hook after each one.
The caller can batch opera
in all search
results - at least IMHO.
--
Amadeusz ?o?nowski
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 489 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20140121/37dcb448/attachment.pgp>
Hi,
This is a function that I find really useful. I adapted it a bit based
on the original from Jacek Generowicz. Maybe others will find it helpful
as well.
Sebastian
;; original
https://groups.google.com/group/mu-discuss/browse_thread/thread/551b7a6487a0aeb3
(setq notmuch-compose-complete-i
On Tue, Jan 21 2014, david at tethera.net wrote:
> From: David Bremner
>
> Although we didn't formally deprecate the old format, the new one has
> been available for a year.
> ---
> NEWS | 10 ++
> notmuch-dump.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> d
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 489 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20140121/f52edb5a/attachment.pgp>
Hi,
This is a function that I find really useful. I adapted it a bit based
on the original from Jacek Generowicz. Maybe others will find it helpful
as well.
Sebastian
;; original
https://groups.google.com/group/mu-discuss/browse_thread/thread/551b7a6487a0aeb3
(setq notmuch-compose-complete-i
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20140121/2817dc95/attachment.html>
Amadeusz ?o?nowski writes:
>
> The question is: should exclude_tags be used in context of killed/mute?
> This is just for skipping ?inbox?, not for hiding them in all search
> results - at least IMHO.
>
For me I definitely want a muted thread to disappear in all searches. I
have at least three "
Amadeusz ?o?nowski writes:
>> I have developed a small minor mode to mute email threads with notmuch.
>
> FYI, it seems to be similar to "killed" option of afew[1].
>
> [1] https://github.com/teythoon/afew
As far as I can tell, neither afew nor alot uses
search.exclude_tags. This seems unfortunat
From: David Bremner
Although we didn't formally deprecate the old format, the new one has
been available for a year.
---
NEWS | 10 ++
notmuch-dump.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
index 28788d8..bdb248e 100644
--- a/NEWS
+++
Thanks everyone for the feedback.
I wasn't aware it could be done on the command line, on the other hand I
really wanted to experiment and see how much notmuch was hackable with
Emacs Lisp.
I'll probably explore the command line option for a next version.
For me it's important that muted thread
kototama kototama writes:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I have developed a small minor mode to mute email threads with notmuch.
>
> http://dialectical-computing.de/blog/blog/2014/01/17/an-emacs-minor-mode-to-mute-email-threads/
>
> https://github.com/kototama/notmuch-kill-mode
>
> I hope it can be useful
Amadeusz Żołnowski writes:
>
> The question is: should exclude_tags be used in context of killed/mute?
> This is just for skipping „inbox”, not for hiding them in all search
> results - at least IMHO.
>
For me I definitely want a muted thread to disappear in all searches. I
have at least three "
David Bremner writes:
> Amadeusz Żołnowski writes:
>>> I have developed a small minor mode to mute email threads with notmuch.
>>
>> FYI, it seems to be similar to "killed" option of afew[1].
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/teythoon/afew
>
> As far as I can tell, neither afew nor alot uses
> search
Amadeusz Żołnowski writes:
>> I have developed a small minor mode to mute email threads with notmuch.
>
> FYI, it seems to be similar to "killed" option of afew[1].
>
> [1] https://github.com/teythoon/afew
As far as I can tell, neither afew nor alot uses
search.exclude_tags. This seems unfortunat
On Tue, Jan 21 2014, da...@tethera.net wrote:
> From: David Bremner
>
> Although we didn't formally deprecate the old format, the new one has
> been available for a year.
> ---
> NEWS | 10 ++
> notmuch-dump.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff
kototama kototama writes:
> Hello everyone,
Hi,
> I have developed a small minor mode to mute email threads with notmuch.
FYI, it seems to be similar to "killed" option of afew[1].
[1] https://github.com/teythoon/afew
Regards,
--
Amadeusz Żołnowski
pgpbhqNMsoedx.pgp
Description: PGP si
From: David Bremner
Although we didn't formally deprecate the old format, the new one has
been available for a year.
---
NEWS | 10 ++
notmuch-dump.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
index 28788d8..bdb248e 100644
--- a/NEWS
+++
kototama kototama writes:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I have developed a small minor mode to mute email threads with notmuch.
>
> http://dialectical-computing.de/blog/blog/2014/01/17/an-emacs-minor-mode-to-mute-email-threads/
>
> https://github.com/kototama/notmuch-kill-mode
>
> I hope it can be useful
Hello everyone,
I have developed a small minor mode to mute email threads with notmuch.
http://dialectical-computing.de/blog/blog/2014/01/17/an-emacs-minor-mode-to-mute-email-threads/
https://github.com/kototama/notmuch-kill-mode
I hope it can be useful for some of you.
Best regards
_
24 matches
Mail list logo