`mail-user-agent' is defined with defcustom and may be customised
by users. It should not be set to arbitrary values in modules.
To make use of that configuration value call `compose-mail' which
starts user's preferred mail composition package as selected with
the variable `mail-user-agent'
David Edmondson writes:
> On Fri, Dec 12 2014, Lele Gaifax wrote:
>> Wouldn't it be more "correct" to pass the unchanged `options' list and
>> the "real" `orig' text as `initial-input' to the customizable function
>> instead?
>
> Would I then have to press TAB twice to get the first result?
No,
Michal Sojka writes:
>> An (almost) equivalent of "notmuch-addrlookup foo" could be "notmuch
>> address to:foo* OR from:foo*", but it has at least one indesiderable
>> difference: it seems considering the "CC" field, but always emits the
>> "TO" content (i.e., assuming I have a message I sent to
On Fri, Dec 12 2014, Lele Gaifax wrote:
> David Edmondson writes:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 12 2014, Lele Gaifax wrote:
>>> Wouldn't it be more "correct" to pass the unchanged `options' list and
>>> the "real" `orig' text as `initial-input' to the customizable function
>>> instead?
>>
>> Would I then have
On Fri, Dec 12 2014, Lele Gaifax wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Yesterday I tweaked my Emacs configuration to use "ido-completing-read"
> to select the right address in the minibuffer, and noticed what seems a
> glitch in the related code.
>
> To accomplish the goal, I implemented my own selection function
Hi Lele,
On Fri, Dec 12 2014, Lele Gaifax wrote:
> Hi all again,
>
> I'm happily using "notmuch-addrlookup"[1] as "notmuch-address-command", in
> my Emacs configuration.
>
> As explained in my other message, yesterday I spent some time tweaking
> that configuration and tried to replace it with
Hi all again,
I'm happily using "notmuch-addrlookup"[1] as "notmuch-address-command", in
my Emacs configuration.
As explained in my other message, yesterday I spent some time tweaking
that configuration and tried to replace it with the new "notmuch
address" introduced in version 0.19.
An
Hi all,
Yesterday I tweaked my Emacs configuration to use "ido-completing-read"
to select the right address in the minibuffer, and noticed what seems a
glitch in the related code.
To accomplish the goal, I implemented my own selection function
(defun esk-notmuch-address-selection-function
Hi all,
Yesterday I tweaked my Emacs configuration to use ido-completing-read
to select the right address in the minibuffer, and noticed what seems a
glitch in the related code.
To accomplish the goal, I implemented my own selection function
(defun esk-notmuch-address-selection-function
Hi all again,
I'm happily using notmuch-addrlookup[1] as notmuch-address-command, in
my Emacs configuration.
As explained in my other message, yesterday I spent some time tweaking
that configuration and tried to replace it with the new notmuch
address introduced in version 0.19.
An (almost)
Hi Lele,
On Fri, Dec 12 2014, Lele Gaifax wrote:
Hi all again,
I'm happily using notmuch-addrlookup[1] as notmuch-address-command, in
my Emacs configuration.
As explained in my other message, yesterday I spent some time tweaking
that configuration and tried to replace it with the new
Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz writes:
An (almost) equivalent of notmuch-addrlookup foo could be notmuch
address to:foo* OR from:foo*, but it has at least one indesiderable
difference: it seems considering the CC field, but always emits the
TO content (i.e., assuming I have a message I sent
On Fri, Dec 12 2014, Lele Gaifax wrote:
Hi all,
Yesterday I tweaked my Emacs configuration to use ido-completing-read
to select the right address in the minibuffer, and noticed what seems a
glitch in the related code.
To accomplish the goal, I implemented my own selection function
David Edmondson d...@dme.org writes:
On Fri, Dec 12 2014, Lele Gaifax wrote:
Wouldn't it be more correct to pass the unchanged `options' list and
the real `orig' text as `initial-input' to the customizable function
instead?
Would I then have to press TAB twice to get the first result?
No,
On Fri, Dec 12 2014, Lele Gaifax wrote:
David Edmondson d...@dme.org writes:
On Fri, Dec 12 2014, Lele Gaifax wrote:
Wouldn't it be more correct to pass the unchanged `options' list and
the real `orig' text as `initial-input' to the customizable function
instead?
Would I then have to press
15 matches
Mail list logo
