Re: [PATCH] cli/insert: do not lose the SMTP envelope

2016-01-02 Thread Tomi Ollila
On Fri, Jan 01 2016, J Farkas wrote: > From: Janos Farkas > Subject: [PATCH] cli/insert: do not lose the SMTP envelope > > Make sure we store the envelope sender/recipient if provided by > qmail-command(8) in $RPLINE and

Re: cli/insert: do not lose the SMTP envelope

2016-01-02 Thread J Farkas
On 2016-01-02 at 13:28:02, Tomi Ollila wrote: > On Fri, Jan 01 2016, J Farkas > wrote: > > Make sure we store the envelope sender/recipient if provided by > > qmail-command(8) in $RPLINE and $DTLINE. > > --- > > Probably good feature, but like >

[PATCH 2/3] emacs: Refactor notmuch-mua-mail

2016-01-02 Thread Michal Sojka
This should be more readable. --- emacs/notmuch-mua.el | 26 +- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/emacs/notmuch-mua.el b/emacs/notmuch-mua.el index d4950cb..2d6825d 100644 --- a/emacs/notmuch-mua.el +++ b/emacs/notmuch-mua.el @@ -320,24

[PATCH 3/3] emacs: Handle switch-function argument of notmuch-mua-mail

2016-01-02 Thread Michal Sojka
notmuch-mua-mail ignored the switch-function argument and always used the function returned by notmuch-mua-get-switch-function instead. In order to support standard emacs interfaces (compose-mail in this case), this commit changes notmuch-mua-mail to use the switch-function argument if it is

notmuch-message-mode initialization follow-up

2016-01-02 Thread Michal Sojka
Hi, the first patch fixes the problem reported in id:87wprt2r4f.fsf@zancas.localnet. Patch 2/3 is just refactoring. Patch 3/3 is reaction to id:87y4cc3qse.fsf@zancas.localnet; I'm not sure whether it addresses exactly what David had in mind, but IMHO it is an improvement. Cheers. -Michal

[PATCH 1/3] emacs: Fix mail composition under Emacs 23

2016-01-02 Thread Michal Sojka
Commit 570c0aeb40bd0c3af8174624a55e968f62c44f09 reworked notmuch-mua-mail function in a way that worked only under Emacs 24. The reason was that message-setup-1 took one argument less in Emacs 23. We fix this by only supplying the return-action argument when it is actually set by the caller. ---

Re: [PATCH v2] emacs: Improve notmuch-message-mode initialization

2016-01-02 Thread Michal Sojka
On Fri, Jan 01 2016, David Bremner wrote: > David Bremner writes: > >> Michal Sojka writes: >> >>> This commit fixes these problems by replacing a call to message-mail >>> with notmuch-specific code that is (hopefully) equivalent to >>> message-mail

Re: notmuch-message-mode initialization follow-up

2016-01-02 Thread Tomi Ollila
On Sat, Jan 02 2016, Michal Sojka wrote: > Hi, > > the first patch fixes the problem reported in > id:87wprt2r4f.fsf@zancas.localnet. Patch 2/3 is just refactoring. > Patch 3/3 is reaction to id:87y4cc3qse.fsf@zancas.localnet; I'm not > sure whether it addresses exactly what

[BUG] [notmuch-tree] Display problems when database is locked

2016-01-02 Thread Simon Castellan
Hi, I'm using notmuch-tree and I encountered a slightly annoying bug. When browsing through a notmuch-tree buffer, if I open up a message whose tags needs to be changed (eg. the message needs to be marked read), then on the /next/ message, the bottom part of the pane does not get killed and thus,

Re: notmuch-mua and jl-encrypt (was: file-error "not a regular file")

2016-01-02 Thread Michal Sojka
Hi fauno, On Wed, Dec 30 2015, fauno wrote: > Michal Sojka writes: >> can you share more details about how do you use jl-encrypt and which >> functions do not work? Recently, I posted a few patches that fix some >> problems related to the replacing message-mode with >>