Re: [PATCH] doc/reply: Clarify how reply-to header is handled

Michal Sojka writes: > Current documentation and comments in the code do not correspond to > the actual code and tests in the test suite ("Un-munging Reply-To" in > T230-reply-to-sender.sh). Fix it. > --- pushed, sorry it took so long. d

Re: [PATCH 3/3] test: canonicalize quotes in xapian error messages

David Bremner writes: > These differ between 1.2 and 1.3, so we transform the 1.2 backquote to a > single quote for compatibility pushed the remaining to 2 patches. We can now claim to support xapian 1.3, although it would be nice if configure knew about xapian-config-1.3 d

Re: [PATCH v2] lib: NOTMUCH_DEPRECATED macro also for older compilers

Tomi Ollila writes: > Some compilers (older than gcc 4.5 and clang 2.9) do support > __attribute__ ((deprecated)) but not > __attribute__ ((deprecated("message"))). > > Check if clang version is at least 3.0, or gcc version > is at least 4.5 to define NOTMUCH_DEPRECATED as

Re: [PATCH] emacs: hello: promote '?' as the universal help key

Jani Nikula writes: > Move the brief help text at the bottom of the hello screen to the > notmuch-hello-mode help, and promote '?' as the universal help key > across Notmuch. This unclutters the hello screen, and allows for a > more verbose description in the mode help.

Re: [Jakub Wilk] Bug#749890: python3-notmuch: missing header in mbox message -> NullPointerError

Hi, Quoting David Bremner (2014-05-30 15:14:46) > this looks like a bug in the python bindings to me > > Package: python3-notmuch > Version: 0.18-3 > Severity: minor > > If a message starts with the "From " postmark (i.e., it's in the mbox > format), and you ask the get_header() method for a

Re: [PATCH 6/6] WIP: support XDG database directory

This is good opening for (eventually "fixing" e.g. library interface...); in its current state I can come up 2 (easily solvable) problems 1) the xapian database holding email indexes can grow to be quite large; user may have large space for emails (somewhere else than HOME) but small HOME. This

Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] Improve the acquisition of text parts.

David Edmondson writes: > On Sun, Mar 13 2016, Mark Walters wrote: >> However, it would be sensible to get testing in a greater variety of >> charsets/encodings > > Agreed. Does anyone have suggestions on how we might achieve this? A > corpus of mail that we could use? Maybe the

Re: [PATCH] emacs: hello: promote '?' as the universal help key

On Sun, Mar 13 2016, Jani Nikula wrote: > [ text/plain ] > Move the brief help text at the bottom of the hello screen to the > notmuch-hello-mode help, and promote '?' as the universal help key > across Notmuch. This unclutters the hello screen, and allows for a > more verbose

Re: [PATCH] emacs: hello: promote '?' as the universal help key

Looks good, thanks for doing it. On Sun, Mar 13 2016, Jani Nikula wrote: > Move the brief help text at the bottom of the hello screen to the > notmuch-hello-mode help, and promote '?' as the universal help key > across Notmuch. This unclutters the hello screen, and allows for a > more verbose

Re: (emacs) Parsing problems replying to encrypted html

On Sun, Mar 13 2016, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Sat, 12 Mar 2016, David Edmondson wrote: >> Is "reply" from search mode a common pattern of use? Currently it seems >> generally un-useful (the thread has to contain just a single message - >> not just a single matching message). > > I

Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] Improve the acquisition of text parts.

On Sun, Mar 13 2016, Mark Walters wrote: > However, it would be sensible to get testing in a greater variety of > charsets/encodings Agreed. Does anyone have suggestions on how we might achieve this? A corpus of mail that we could use? ___ notmuch

Re: [PATCH] Don't bother checking for mbox files

On Sun, Mar 13 2016, Jani Nikula wrote: > [ text/plain ] > On Sun, 13 Mar 2016, Edward Betts wrote: >> Keith Packard wrote: >>> Postfix adds mbox-style From lines when used in combination with >>> maildrop or .forward files. If they have