On Wed, May 18 2016, Michal Sojka wrote:
> On Wed, May 18 2016, Mark Walters wrote:
>> This commit lets the user customize the address completion. It makes
>> two changes.
>
> Thanks Mark, now it LGTM.
>
> I configured my address completion to be based on received emails and
> I'm surprised how m
David Bremner writes:
> From: Ludovic LANGE
>
> The Ruby bindings were missing a way to get all the tags of the
> database. Now you should be able to access this with the public
> instance method `all_tags` of your database object.
rebased version pushed to master
d
___
Tomi Ollila writes:
>
> As a side enchangement, all of the 3 entries in the whole source
> tree cd'ing to `dirname` of "$0" now uses syntax cd "$(dirname "$0")".
> This makes these particular lines work when current working directory
> is e.g. /c/Program Files/notmuch/test/.
> (Probably it would f
Tomi Ollila writes:
> The new function notmuch-show-message-resend re-sends
> message to new recipients using #'message-resend.
>
> Recipients are read from minibuffer as a comma-separated
> string (with some keyboard support including tab completion).
>
> Final confirmation before sending is ask
Tomi Ollila writes:
> In case of notmuch reply and notmuch show --part=N it is required that
> search terms match to one message. If match count was != 1, error
> message "Error: search term did not match precisely one message"
> was too vague to explain what happened.
>
> By appending (matched
Tomi Ollila writes:
> By combining the common parts of CONFIGURE_CFLAGS and CONFIGURE_CXXFLAGS
> to a separate make variable and using that as part of their
> definitions makes setting of these easier, DRYer and less error prone
> (especially as we cannot check potential typing errors there).
pu
