Re: Bug/Issue: References header doesn't wrap in emacs package

On 2015-10-02 21:21, David Bremner wrote: >>> The problem is a References header that is too long/not wrapped. >>> >> >> Hi Allan; >> >> Thanks for the report. I can see how notmuch-reply would generate a >> long references header in that situation. We rely on message-mode

[PATCH] WIP: regexp matching in subjects

the idea is that you can run % notmuch search 'subject:rx:' or % notmuch search subject:"your usual phrase search" This should also work with bindings. --- Here is Austin's "hack", crammed into the field processor framework. I seem to have broken one of the existing subject search tests with

Re: searching: '*analysis' vs 'reanalysis'

Quoth Gaute Hope on Jun 06 at 8:08 pm: > Austin Clements writes on juni 6, 2016 21:20: > > > >The experiment was specifically for regexp matching subject, but it should > >work for any header we store a literal copy of in the database. > > Does it work for terms in the body of the message? No.

Re: searching: '*analysis' vs 'reanalysis'

On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 1:29 PM, David Bremner wrote: > Sebastian Fischmeister writes: > > > > > I ran into this problem before as well. Storage is cheap. Notmuch could > > index all emails with reversed text to get around some of this > > problem. It

Re: searching: '*analysis' vs 'reanalysis'

Austin Clements writes on juni 6, 2016 21:20: The experiment was specifically for regexp matching subject, but it should work for any header we store a literal copy of in the database. Does it work for terms in the body of the message? ___ notmuch

Re: searching: '*analysis' vs 'reanalysis'

Sebastian Fischmeister writes: > > I ran into this problem before as well. Storage is cheap. Notmuch could > index all emails with reversed text to get around some of this > problem. It doesn't solve the problem of *analysis*, but it's still an > improvement. It would

Re: searching: '*analysis' vs 'reanalysis'

>> It is not possible to use wildcards at the beginning of a term. > > after the current explanation to emphasize this limitation (possibly > blaming Xapian to avoid futile requests). > > I think it is something many would expect (and want). The current > description feels more like an example,

[PATCH] lib: fix definition of LIBNOTMUCH_CHECK_VERSION

Fix bug reported in id:20160606124522.g2y2eazhhrwjs...@flatcap.org Although the C99 standard 6.10 is a little non-obvious on this point, the docs for e.g. gcc are unambiguous. And indeed in practice with the extra space, this code fails int main(int argc, char **argv){ printf("%d\n",foo(1)); }

Re: [PATCH] lib: fix definition of LIBNOTMUCH_CHECK_VERSION

David Bremner writes: > Fix bug reported in id:20160606124522.g2y2eazhhrwjs...@flatcap.org > > Although the C99 standard 6.10 is a little non-obvious on this point, > the docs for e.g. gcc are unambiguous. And indeed in practice with the > extra space, this code fails > > int

LIBNOTMUCH_CHECK_VERSION macro broken

In the macro definition begins: #define LIBNOTMUCH_CHECK_VERSION (major, minor, micro) There shouldn't be a space before the ( This is from the current version in git. Cheers, Rich / FlatCap ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org

Re: searching: '*analysis' vs 'reanalysis'

David Bremner writes on juni 6, 2016 14:42: Gaute Hope writes: Hi, I have an email with the word 'reanalysis' in the subject line and the email body. However, when I try to search for '*analysis' or 'analysis' I do not get any matches, should not '*analysis' at least

Re: searching: '*analysis' vs 'reanalysis'

Gaute Hope writes: > Hi, > > I have an email with the word 'reanalysis' in the subject line and the > email body. However, when I try to search for '*analysis' or 'analysis' > I do not get any matches, should not '*analysis' at least match? > We talked about this on IRC

searching: '*analysis' vs 'reanalysis'

Hi, I have an email with the word 'reanalysis' in the subject line and the email body. However, when I try to search for '*analysis' or 'analysis' I do not get any matches, should not '*analysis' at least match? Regards, Gaute ___ notmuch mailing

Re: [PATCH] doc: document notmuch-dump header line

On Mon, Jun 06 2016, David Bremner wrote: > This was introduced with the libconfig changes, but not documented then. > --- > > after some IRC discussion with Tomi, this rst is slightly less gross LGTM. Tomi > doc/man1/notmuch-dump.rst | 10 +- > 1 file changed, 9