Re: ask notmuch to find back "reply-to's"
On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Sat 2016-07-02 20:28:41 -0400, Xu Wang wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> I have a situation where sometimes I sync a later message. For >> example, the following happens on times: >> >> 1a. sync message 1. >> 1b. not much new >> 2a. sync message 3 (which replied to message 2) >> 2b. not much new >> 3. sync message 2 (which replied to message 1) >> 3b. not much new >> >> This happens because of my workflow of offlineimap. It takes a long >> time to sync some folders so often I prefer to skip, but sometimes >> they contain replies. > > on most systems, assuming standard headers, notmuch should indeed > assemble these into the same thread. > > the relevant headers are In-Reply-To and References. > > Can you show those headers for this example? If they have these message-IDs: > > message 1: XXX > message 2: YYY > message 3: ZZZ > > then i'd expect the following headers: > > message 1: >Message-Id: XXX > > message 2: >Message-Id: YYY >In-Reply-To: XXX >References: XXX > message 3: >Message-Id: ZZZ >In-Reply-To: YYY >References: XXX, YYY > > > If notmuch has indexed them all, they should all be part of the same > thread. Ah good to know! I will keep eye out for this issue to pop up. I don't have it now since I performed a clean notmuch new to build database. Thank you for detailed response!! Kind regards, Xu > > --dkg ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
Re: ask notmuch to find back "reply-to's"
On Sat 2016-07-02 20:28:41 -0400, Xu Wang wrote: > Hello all, > > I have a situation where sometimes I sync a later message. For > example, the following happens on times: > > 1a. sync message 1. > 1b. not much new > 2a. sync message 3 (which replied to message 2) > 2b. not much new > 3. sync message 2 (which replied to message 1) > 3b. not much new > > This happens because of my workflow of offlineimap. It takes a long > time to sync some folders so often I prefer to skip, but sometimes > they contain replies. on most systems, assuming standard headers, notmuch should indeed assemble these into the same thread. the relevant headers are In-Reply-To and References. Can you show those headers for this example? If they have these message-IDs: message 1: XXX message 2: YYY message 3: ZZZ then i'd expect the following headers: message 1: Message-Id: XXX message 2: Message-Id: YYY In-Reply-To: XXX References: XXX message 3: Message-Id: ZZZ In-Reply-To: YYY References: XXX, YYY If notmuch has indexed them all, they should all be part of the same thread. --dkg ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
Re: [PATCH] emacs: crypto: verify pgpmime by default
Felipe Balbi writes: > This patch changes default value of > notmuch-crypto-process-mime to t in order to tell > notmuch to verify pgpmime messages. This is a good idea, I think, but it breaks 13 tests for me. Mostly the changes seem to be in the emacs output, of the form - [ Unknown key ID 0x9D20F6503E33 or unsupported algorithm ] + [ Unknown signature status ] At the moment I don't know if this is the correct output with notmuch-crypto-process-mime = t; if so it would be a mechanical process to update the tests. d signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
