Header protection / memoryhole [was: Re: Header encryption / memoryhole]

2018-04-08 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Mon 2018-04-02 18:58:28 +0200, Varac wrote: > I'd like to know the state of header encryption support for > notmuch (aka memoryhole) [1]. "memoryhole" refers to "protected headers", not just encrypted headers. That is, the headers can be protected both by cryptographic signature *and* by

Re: [PATCH 2/2] test: pytest runner for the test suite

2018-04-08 Thread Floris Bruynooghe
This series looks good to me, would be great to have! Do you want to commit them this or should I just incorporate it and submit together with tests once actual tests exist. You could always commit with a ``def test_dummy(): assert True`` or something if you like. Thanks! Floris On Sat 07 Apr

[PATCH] test: re-enable disabled test in T700-reindex.sh

2018-04-08 Thread David Bremner
The extra test_done looks like a typo --- test/T700-reindex.sh | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/test/T700-reindex.sh b/test/T700-reindex.sh index 2b7bc658..9e795896 100755 --- a/test/T700-reindex.sh +++ b/test/T700-reindex.sh @@ -66,7 +66,6 @@ notmuch restore < prop-dump