On Fri, Aug 23 2019, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> that matches my understanding too. i'd love to move forward with the
> improved bindings, under a different name.
>
> if someone later figures out the compatibility layer that allows
> implementation of the traditional "notmuch" module api atop
On Fri 2019-08-23 09:07:12 -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes:
>
>> The other possibility would be to implement the old "notmuch" API on top
>> of the new one with explicitly logged deprecations. But iirc, the
>> semantics and object lifecycle/ownership issues are subtly
Hi David,
Actually, I've had Emacs session running for a couple of weeks where
I've been also hacking some elisp code - I guess I've changed something
and forgot about that.
Your comment prompted me to try obvious approach - to dissect my init.el
file and, at the end, simple Emacs restart solved
Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes:
> The other possibility would be to implement the old "notmuch" API on top
> of the new one with explicitly logged deprecations. But iirc, the
> semantics and object lifecycle/ownership issues are subtly different
> enough that this would be a non-trivial project.
