Re: unifying and automating draft ("postpone/resume") behavior [was: Re: notmuch "lost" email during power failure]

2019-11-14 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Wed 2019-11-13 10:19:05 -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > Fundamentally, I think message-mode should treat emails the same way > epg.el treats encrypted files: the data in the buffer isn't the same as > the on-disk data, and there should be translation between the two. At > the very least, the

Re: python CFFI bindings integration into notmuch build/test

2019-11-14 Thread Floris Bruynooghe
On Thu 14 Nov 2019 at 23:24 +0100, Floris Bruynooghe wrote: > On Thu 14 Nov 2019 at 22:20 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote: >> In git://notmuchmail.org/git/notmuch David has ref origin/wip/cffi >> which contains related changes -- You can fetch the code while waiting >> for more collaboration

Re: python CFFI bindings integration into notmuch build/test

2019-11-14 Thread Floris Bruynooghe
On Thu 14 Nov 2019 at 22:20 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote: > In git://notmuchmail.org/git/notmuch David has ref origin/wip/cffi > which contains related changes -- You can fetch the code while waiting > for more collaboration instructions from David. Aha, thanks! Floris

Re: [PATCH] Add --message-headers flag to notmuch-show

2019-11-14 Thread Tomi Ollila
On Thu, Nov 14 2019, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Wed 2019-11-13 01:30:50 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 12 2019, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> >>> And, I still haven't heard any clear arguments for choosing between >>> configurability as an absolute thing or a differential thing.

Re: python CFFI bindings integration into notmuch build/test

2019-11-14 Thread Tomi Ollila
On Thu, Nov 14 2019, Floris Bruynooghe wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for carrying on with this! > > I'm a little confused with how to follow this, is the current state of > the code somewhere in a repo/branch where I can try things out and make > changes from? In git://notmuchmail.org/git/notmuch

Re: python CFFI bindings integration into notmuch build/test

2019-11-14 Thread Floris Bruynooghe
Hi, Thanks for carrying on with this! I'm a little confused with how to follow this, is the current state of the code somewhere in a repo/branch where I can try things out and make changes from? On Tue 05 Nov 2019 at 22:22 -0400, David Bremner wrote: > Tomi Ollila writes: > > >> alternative: