On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 9:21 PM Tomi Ollila wrote:
> > On Mon 2020-04-27 14:53:07 -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> >> Quoting notmuch(1)
> >>
> >>OPTION SYNTAX
> >>All options accepting an argument can be used with '='
> >>or ':' as a separator. For the cases where it's not
On Mon, Apr 27 2020, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Mon 2020-04-27 14:53:07 -0300, David Bremner wrote:
>> Quoting notmuch(1)
>>
>>OPTION SYNTAX
>>All options accepting an argument can be used with '='
>>or ':' as a separator. For the cases where it's not ambiguous
>>
On Mon, Apr 27 2020, David Bremner wrote:
> It turns out the behaviour of inline functions in C header files is
> not a good idea, and can cause linking problems if the compiler
> decides not to inline them. In principle this is solvable by using a
> "static inline" declaration, but this
On Mon 2020-04-27 14:53:07 -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> Quoting notmuch(1)
>
>OPTION SYNTAX
>All options accepting an argument can be used with '='
>or ':' as a separator. For the cases where it's not ambiguous
>(in particular excluding boolean options), a space can
On Mon 2020-04-27 09:28:08 -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> It turns out the behaviour of inline functions in C header files is
> not a good idea, and can cause linking problems if the compiler
> decides not to inline them. In principle this is solvable by using a
> "static inline" declaration, but
Ciprian Dorin Craciun writes:
> [Again sorry for double reporting. BTW, where should I search for
> previous bugs? I've currently tried the mailing list archive.]
Another option is
https://nmbug.notmuchmail.org/status
This is just pointers into the mailing archive, but triaged.
>
>
Don Zickus writes:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 08:07:27PM -0300, David Bremner wrote:
>> Don Zickus writes:
>>
>> >
>> > Of course I am using this in a strange context. I am deleting emails
>> > locally and then running 'notmuch new' to clean up the database.
>> >
>> [snip]
>> > So maybe my use
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 08:07:27PM -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> Don Zickus writes:
>
> >
> > Of course I am using this in a strange context. I am deleting emails
> > locally and then running 'notmuch new' to clean up the database.
> >
> [snip]
> > So maybe my use case is unusual and the
It turns out the behaviour of inline functions in C header files is
not a good idea, and can cause linking problems if the compiler
decides not to inline them. In principle this is solvable by using a
"static inline" declaration, but this potentially makes a copy in
every compilation unit. Since
Jonas Bernoulli writes:
> I have fixed the remaining issues and added two small commits.
> See v3.
>
Great, thanks. I've pushed the main one, and tagged the other two for
review.
d
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
10 matches
Mail list logo