Alan Schmitt writes:
>
> I can view a thread with more than 7000 messages (with
> show-only-matching-messages to t) if they are not encrypted. In fact I
> already could with 0.32 if I remember correctly. The fact that messages
> are encrypted seems to matter here.
I've been unable to replicate t
David Bremner writes:
> j...@fedge.ca writes:
>
>>
>> Thanks. I guess I'm still stuck. I downloaded version 31.4 from:
>> https://notmuchmail.org/releases/
>>
>> But when I select "notmuch-0.31.4.tar" for the package-install-file, I
>> get an error:
>> Wrong type argument: stringp, nil
>
> It
j...@fedge.ca writes:
>
> Thanks. I guess I'm still stuck. I downloaded version 31.4 from:
> https://notmuchmail.org/releases/
>
> But when I select "notmuch-0.31.4.tar" for the package-install-file, I
> get an error:
> Wrong type argument: stringp, nil
It's a bit confusing, but there is the
Quoting David Bremner :
Jeff Elliott writes:
[Wed Sep 22 15:49:36 2021]
A caller requested output format version 5, but the installed notmuch
CLI only supports up to format version 4. You may need to upgrade your
notmuch CLI.
When I try to upgrade my notmuch from the Solus package manager,
Jeff Elliott writes:
> [Wed Sep 22 15:49:36 2021]
> A caller requested output format version 5, but the installed notmuch
> CLI only supports up to format version 4. You may need to upgrade your
> notmuch CLI.
>
> When I try to upgrade my notmuch from the Solus package manager, I get
> that it i
Hello,
I've been using notmuch for a few years now. And it's great for my
small business because of the tagging and searching.
Anyway, I just upgraded my OS packages (Solus), and it has notmuch
upgraded to 0.31.4 Which I'm guessing my be my problem? I notice you
have version 0.33.1 recently
Hello,
On 2021-09-22 11:25, Tomi Ollila writes:
>>> e.g (set max-lisp-eval-depth 1600)
>>
>> Thank you for the suggestion. I tried with 1600, and I get a different
>> error (and the numbers are larger now).
>>
>> Debugger entered--Lisp error: (error "Variable binding depth exceeds
>> max-specpdl
On Wed, Sep 22 2021, Alan Schmitt wrote:
> On 2021-09-21 21:27, Tomi Ollila writes:
>
>> I'd be interested to know if changing max-lisp-eval-depth to a larger value
>> made difference.
>>
>> e.g (set max-lisp-eval-depth 1600)
>
> Thank you for the suggestion. I tried with 1600, and I get a diffe