On Tue, 12 Jan 2010, martin f krafft wrote:
> If the MDA delivers to Git, then potentially, you might get into a
> situation where you cannot write your own changes back to the repo. This
> is also a DoS scenario: I'll just keep sending you e-mail, and if I
> manage to pass your mail filters, I
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Asheesh Laroia [2010.01.14.2112 +1300]:
>> Sure. But the MDA doesn't need to do the commit immediately. Since
>> (presumably) we're using Maildir, the MDA on the mail receiving
>> server is going to gene
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Asheesh Laroia [2010.01.21.1928
> +1300]:
>>> I suppose that I never actually considered merges on the IMAP server
>>> side, but obviously the IMAP server has to work off a clone, and that
>>> means
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010, martin f krafft wrote:
If the MDA delivers to Git, then potentially, you might get into a
situation where you cannot write your own changes back to the repo. This
is also a DoS scenario: I'll just keep sending you e-mail, and if I
manage to pass your mail filters, I'll bas
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Asheesh Laroia [2010.01.14.2112 +1300]:
Sure. But the MDA doesn't need to do the commit immediately. Since
(presumably) we're using Maildir, the MDA on the mail receiving
server is going to generate filenames that won't
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Asheesh Laroia [2010.01.21.1928
+1300]:
I suppose that I never actually considered merges on the IMAP server
side, but obviously the IMAP server has to work off a clone, and that
means it needs to merge.
It's not "merge"
