On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 10:35 -0800, Carl Worth wrote: But the above sounds like the List-Id header is unreliable enough to be useless. FWIW, that does not match my experience. Any reason not to just use something like to:notm...@notmuchmail to match messages sent to a list like this one?
On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 15:41 +0100, Carl Worth wrote: > The other reason I've wanted this is have something like a "folder view" > that would show a list of tags and a number of messages with each tag, > (or a number of messages with that tag and the inbox tag). > > I know that Keith said he'd
On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 15:51 +0100, Stefan Schmidt wrote: > Sadly that takes around 25 minutes here on an Intel Core2Duo notbeook > (Thinkpad > X200s). I tried this several times now. CPU load was low (~10%) during this > time > so it is mostly IO bound. I see the same behavior on my notebook.
On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 23:10 +0100, Jan Janak wrote: > Instead of 'inbox' and 'unread', I configure > 'notmuch new' to add a new tag called 'new' (and only that one). This tag > marks newly added messages that haven't been properly tagged yet by my > auto-tagging scripts. Oh, brilliant! I like
On Sun, 2009-11-29 at 08:55 -0500, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > As much as I would love to, at this point I'm not quite offering to > actually be maintainer of a notmuch Debian package. Actually, since Carl is a DD now, I've already nudged him about maintaining a Debian package, and offered
On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 22:11 -0800, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > While playing with notmuch I am still using evolution to read the email > in the same MailDir that is being indexed / processed by notmuch. With > the result that lots of emails can not be found in notmuch if they have > been marked as read
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 10:35 -0800, Carl Worth wrote: > But the above sounds like the List-Id header is unreliable enough to be > useless. FWIW, that does not match my experience. > Any reason not to just use something like > to:notmuch at notmuchmail to match messages sent to a list like this
On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 06:01 +0600, Mikhail Gusarov wrote: > Twas brillig at 16:51:17 16.12.2009 UTC-07 when bdale at gag.com did gyre and > gimble: > > >> But the above sounds like the List-Id header is unreliable enough to > >> be useless. > > BG> FWIW, that does not match my experience. >