Hi all.
I have finished reviewing the user-defined sections v8 series at last.
I found only few minor issues, some of which are fixed by this v9
series and others can be fixed later or ignored (e.g. renaming
notmuch-hello-insert-* functions to notmuch-hello-section-* or
something more
Found a small bug...
Changes:
v10:
* explicitly return nil from `notmuch-hello-insert-recent-searches',
otherwise `indent-rigidly' returns a marker pointing to non-existing
buffer and breaks final-target-pos handling in `notmuch-hello'
v9:
* correctly merge
From: Daniel Schoepe daniel.scho...@googlemail.com
This patch makes the notmuch-hello screen fully customizable
by allowing the user to add and remove arbitrary sections. It
also provides some convenience functions for constructing sections,
e.g. showing the unread message count for each tag.
From: Daniel Schoepe daniel.scho...@googlemail.com
A new file was added for notmuch-hello tests.
---
test/emacs-hello | 47
test/emacs.expected-output/notmuch-hello |3 +-
.../notmuch-hello-new-section |
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 00:18:31 +0100, Michal Sojka wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote:
> > Hi Michal.
> >
> > On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:09:47 +0100, Michal Sojka > os.inf.tu-dresden.de> wrote:
> > > When notmuch-search-line-faces is us
Hi all.
I have finished reviewing the user-defined sections v8 series at last.
I found only few minor issues, some of which are fixed by this v9
series and others can be fixed later or ignored (e.g. renaming
notmuch-hello-insert-* functions to notmuch-hello-section-* or
something more
From: Daniel Schoepe daniel.scho...@googlemail.com
This patch makes the notmuch-hello screen fully customizable
by allowing the user to add and remove arbitrary sections. It
also provides some convenience functions for constructing sections,
e.g. showing the unread message count for each tag.
From: Daniel Schoepe daniel.scho...@googlemail.com
A new file was added for notmuch-hello tests.
---
test/emacs-hello | 47
test/emacs.expected-output/notmuch-hello |3 +-
.../notmuch-hello-new-section |
Hi Michal.
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:09:47 +0100, Michal Sojka wrote:
> When notmuch-search-line-faces is used to set background color in search
> results, the highlight of the current line is not always displayed
> correctly. This patch fixes that by increasing the priority property of
> the
Hi all.
Are there any objections to these changes?
Otherwise, I would ask David to push it as "minor, boring and trivial"
changes.
Regards,
Dmitry
Hello.
Can we delay this patch until user-defined sections are pushed? I know
I promised to review it long ago. But I still did not manage to finish
it yet. I hope I can do it in the beginning of the next week.
Regards,
Dmitry
Hello.
Can we delay this patch until user-defined sections are pushed? I know
I promised to review it long ago. But I still did not manage to finish
it yet. I hope I can do it in the beginning of the next week.
Regards,
Dmitry
___
notmuch mailing
Hi all.
Are there any objections to these changes?
Otherwise, I would ask David to push it as minor, boring and trivial
changes.
Regards,
Dmitry
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
Hi Michal.
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:09:47 +0100, Michal Sojka so...@os.inf.tu-dresden.de
wrote:
When notmuch-search-line-faces is used to set background color in search
results, the highlight of the current line is not always displayed
correctly. This patch fixes that by increasing the priority
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 00:18:31 +0100, Michal Sojka so...@os.inf.tu-dresden.de
wrote:
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote:
Hi Michal.
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:09:47 +0100, Michal Sojka
so...@os.inf.tu-dresden.de wrote:
When notmuch-search-line-faces is used to set background
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:29:26 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> Quoth Dmitry Kurochkin on Feb 13 at 3:09 pm:
> > The notmuch-show view refresh function (`notmuch-show-refresh-view',
> > bound to "=") accepts an optional RETAIN-STATE argument. The patch
> > allows to
The notmuch-show view refresh function (`notmuch-show-refresh-view',
bound to "=") accepts an optional RETAIN-STATE argument. The patch
allows to set this argument interactively by using "C-u =".
---
emacs/notmuch-show.el |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git
Hi Pieter.
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 06:25:39 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> * emacs/notmuch-show.el (notmuch-show-open-or-close-all):
> Rename to `notmuch-show-toggle-all-messages', and make it toggle
> visibility of all messages based on the visibility of the current
> message, instead of
Hi Pieter.
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 06:25:39 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
* emacs/notmuch-show.el (notmuch-show-open-or-close-all):
Rename to `notmuch-show-toggle-all-messages', and make it toggle
visibility of all messages based on the visibility of the current
message,
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:29:26 -0500, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
Quoth Dmitry Kurochkin on Feb 13 at 3:09 pm:
The notmuch-show view refresh function (`notmuch-show-refresh-view',
bound to =) accepts an optional RETAIN-STATE argument. The patch
allows to set this argument
Hi Adam.
On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 21:27:29 -0700, Adam Wolfe Gordon <awg+notmuch at xvx.ca>
wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 00:22, Dmitry Kurochkin
> wrote:
> >> Reply now enforces that only one message is returned, as the semantics
> >> of reply
Hi Adam.
On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 21:27:29 -0700, Adam Wolfe Gordon awg+notm...@xvx.ca wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 00:22, Dmitry Kurochkin
dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote:
Reply now enforces that only one message is returned, as the semantics
of replying to multiple messages
Hi Adam.
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 17:21:54 -0700, Adam Wolfe Gordon
wrote:
> This new JSON format for replies includes headers generated for a
> reply message as well as the headers of the original message. Using
> this data, a client can intelligently create a reply. For
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 16:43:15 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> Optimize thread tagging by combining all the tagging operations to a
> single "notmuch tag" call.
>
> For threads in the order of tens or a hundred inbox tagged messages,
> this gives a noticeable speedup. On two different machines,
Recent changes in notmuch-show tagging introduced some code
duplication. The patch cleanups and simplifies
`notmuch-show-archive-thread' function by using
`notmuch-show-tag-all', no longer used function are removed. After
the change, `notmuch-show-archive-thread' function becomes symmetric
with
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 16:43:15 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
Optimize thread tagging by combining all the tagging operations to a
single notmuch tag call.
For threads in the order of tens or a hundred inbox tagged messages,
this gives a noticeable speedup. On two different
Hi Adam.
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 17:21:54 -0700, Adam Wolfe Gordon awg+notm...@xvx.ca
wrote:
This new JSON format for replies includes headers generated for a
reply message as well as the headers of the original message. Using
this data, a client can intelligently create a reply. For example,
On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 05:05:03 -0500, Ethan Glasser-Camp
wrote:
> From: Ethan Glasser-Camp
>
> scandir() returns "strings allocated via malloc(3)" which are then
> "collected in array namelist which is allocated via
> malloc(3)". Currently we just free the array namelist. Instead, free
> all the
Hi Ethan.
On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 01:50:05 -0500, Ethan Glasser-Camp
wrote:
> From: Ethan Glasser-Camp
>
> scandir() returns "strings allocated via malloc(3)" which are then
> "collected in array namelist which is allocated via
> malloc(3)". Currently we just free the array namelist. Instead,
Hi Ethan.
On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 01:50:05 -0500, Ethan Glasser-Camp gla...@cs.rpi.edu
wrote:
From: Ethan Glasser-Camp et...@betacantrips.com
scandir() returns strings allocated via malloc(3) which are then
collected in array namelist which is allocated via
malloc(3). Currently we just free
On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 05:05:03 -0500, Ethan Glasser-Camp gla...@cs.rpi.edu
wrote:
From: Ethan Glasser-Camp et...@betacantrips.com
scandir() returns strings allocated via malloc(3) which are then
collected in array namelist which is allocated via
malloc(3). Currently we just free the array
On Sun, 5 Feb 2012 12:42:12 -0700, Adam Wolfe Gordon
wrote:
> Thanks for the review. The style nits are things I missed in my
> previous cleanup, so thanks for pointing them out. I should probably
> run uncrustify and see if it complains about anything else.
>
> The other
On Sat, 04 Feb 2012 07:37:45 -0500, David Bremner wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 12:02:33 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin gmail.com> wrote:
> > Argc and argv arguments are used in notmuch_tag_command() function.
> > So unused attribute is not appropriate for them.
>
> pushed,
On Sat, 4 Feb 2012 16:24:24 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> v2
>
> * Remove unnecessary braces (id:87lioooj7m.fsf at gmail.com)
>
> * Trivial rebase against master
>
Based on the change log and IRC discussion, I think this series does not
need another round of reviews. So it looks like
---
NEWS | 18 ++
1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
index 5c5b645..f449fba 100644
--- a/NEWS
+++ b/NEWS
@@ -39,6 +39,24 @@ Reply to sender
and search modes, 'r' has been bound to reply to sender, replacing
reply to all, which now
This makes the argument names more consistent and clear. The
following functions changed: `notmuch-tag',
`notmuch-search-tag-thread', `notmuch-search-tag-region' and
`notmuch-search-tag-all'.
---
emacs/notmuch.el | 33 +
1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 16
Since `notmuch-tag' is a non-interactive function and hence is meant
to be invoked programmatically, it should accept zero tags. Also, the
tagging operations (bound to "*", "+", "-") would accept empty input
without an error.
---
emacs/notmuch.el | 10 +-
1 files changed, 5
The tag syntax check in `notmuch-tag' function was too strict and did
not allow nmbug tags with "::". Since the check is done for all
tagging operations in Emacs UI, this basically means that no nmbug
tags can be changed. The patch relaxes the tag syntax check to allow
any tag names that do not
Some tag-related operations accept a single tag without prefix
(`notmuch-select-tag-with-completion'), others accept multiple tags
prefixed with '+' or '-' (`notmuch-read-tag-changes'). Before the
change, both functions used a single default minibuffer history. This
is inconvenient because you
The patch adds `notmuch-show-tag-all' function bound to "*" in
notmuch-show view. The function is similar to the
`notmuch-search-tag-all' function for the notmuch-search view: it
changes tags for all messages in the current thread.
---
emacs/notmuch-show.el | 35
`Notmuch-search-tag-all' is more clear and consistent with other
tagging function names.
---
emacs/notmuch.el |6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/emacs/notmuch.el b/emacs/notmuch.el
index 1b472dd..1f351a5 100644
--- a/emacs/notmuch.el
+++
Before the change, "+" and "-" tagging operations in notmuch-show view
accepted only a single tag. The patch makes them use the recently
added `notmuch-read-tag-changes' function, which allows to enter
multiple tags with "+" and "-" prefixes. So after the change, "+" and
"-" bindings in
Before the change, "+" and "-" tagging operations in notmuch-search
view accepted only a single tag. The patch makes them use the
recently added `notmuch-read-tag-changes' function (renamed
`notmuch-select-tags-with-completion'), which allows to enter multiple
tags with "+" and "-" prefixes. So
---
emacs/notmuch.el |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/emacs/notmuch.el b/emacs/notmuch.el
index 19206db..5980fea 100644
--- a/emacs/notmuch.el
+++ b/emacs/notmuch.el
@@ -571,7 +571,7 @@ the messages that were tagged"
(let ((beg (+ (point) 1)))
Before the change, tag format validation was done in
`notmuch-search-operate-all' function only. The patch moves it down
to `notmuch-tag', so that all users of that function get input
validation.
---
emacs/notmuch.el | 12 ++--
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff
Changes:
v4:
* rebased on master, no conflicts so no need for another review
v4:
* rebased on master after Jameson's archiving changes
v3:
* merged 3 `notmuch-show-tag-all'-related patches into one
* add patch to clean up tagging function argument names
* fix other comments from Austin's
Hi David.
I think this is a pretty simple change. And there is one +1 for it. So
I am going to remove the needs-review tag, please add it back if you
disagree.
Regards,
Dmitry
Hi Mark.
I am not sure I like this solution. My concerns are:
* New option looks too complex, too specific.
* There are more aspects of notmuch reply behavior which users would
like to change (e.g. which part to quote). If we add an option for
each, we complicate both nomtuch show UI and
On Sat, 4 Feb 2012 16:24:24 -0500, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote:
v2
* Remove unnecessary braces (id:87lioooj7m@gmail.com)
* Trivial rebase against master
Based on the change log and IRC discussion, I think this series does not
need another round of reviews. So it looks
On Sat, 04 Feb 2012 07:37:45 -0500, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 12:02:33 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote:
Argc and argv arguments are used in notmuch_tag_command() function.
So unused attribute is not appropriate for them.
pushed
On Sun, 5 Feb 2012 12:42:12 -0700, Adam Wolfe Gordon awg+notm...@xvx.ca wrote:
Thanks for the review. The style nits are things I missed in my
previous cleanup, so thanks for pointing them out. I should probably
run uncrustify and see if it complains about anything else.
The other points are
`Notmuch-wash-region-to-button' is the function that creates hidden
regions with buttons for signatures, citations and original messages.
Before the change, it did not work correctly if the to-be-hidden
region started at the beginning of a message: the visibility toggle
button was hidden as well.
The test is currently broken and will be fixed by a subsequent patch.
The patch adds a new file for tests of Emacs notmuch-show view.
Based on patch by David Edmondson [1].
[1] id:"1327562380-12894-4-git-send-email-dme at dme.org"
---
test/emacs-show | 28
Changes since v1:
* rebase on the current master, just one trivial conflict so no need
for another round of review
Regards,
Dmitry
On Fri, 3 Feb 2012 23:01:23 -0700, Adam Wolfe Gordon
wrote:
> Oh, and I just noticed that Dmitry has already fixed this, probably in
> a better way [1] (though I maintain that there still may be a problem
> with the approach in general). I clearly haven't been following
Hi Mark.
I am not sure I like this solution. My concerns are:
* New option looks too complex, too specific.
* There are more aspects of notmuch reply behavior which users would
like to change (e.g. which part to quote). If we add an option for
each, we complicate both nomtuch show UI and
Hi David.
I think this is a pretty simple change. And there is one +1 for it. So
I am going to remove the needs-review tag, please add it back if you
disagree.
Regards,
Dmitry
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Changes:
v4:
* rebased on master, no conflicts so no need for another review
v4:
* rebased on master after Jameson's archiving changes
v3:
* merged 3 `notmuch-show-tag-all'-related patches into one
* add patch to clean up tagging function argument names
* fix other comments from Austin's
Before the change, tag format validation was done in
`notmuch-search-operate-all' function only. The patch moves it down
to `notmuch-tag', so that all users of that function get input
validation.
---
emacs/notmuch.el | 12 ++--
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff
Before the change, + and - tagging operations in notmuch-show view
accepted only a single tag. The patch makes them use the recently
added `notmuch-read-tag-changes' function, which allows to enter
multiple tags with + and - prefixes. So after the change, + and
- bindings in notmuch-show view
Before the change, + and - tagging operations in notmuch-search
view accepted only a single tag. The patch makes them use the
recently added `notmuch-read-tag-changes' function (renamed
`notmuch-select-tags-with-completion'), which allows to enter multiple
tags with + and - prefixes. So after
After the recent tagging operations changes, functions bound to +
and - in notmuch-search and notmuch-show views always read input
from the minibuffer. Use kbd macros instead of calling them directly.
---
test/emacs | 20 ++--
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
`Notmuch-search-tag-all' is more clear and consistent with other
tagging function names.
---
emacs/notmuch.el |6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/emacs/notmuch.el b/emacs/notmuch.el
index 1b472dd..1f351a5 100644
--- a/emacs/notmuch.el
+++
Some tag-related operations accept a single tag without prefix
(`notmuch-select-tag-with-completion'), others accept multiple tags
prefixed with '+' or '-' (`notmuch-read-tag-changes'). Before the
change, both functions used a single default minibuffer history. This
is inconvenient because you
The tag syntax check in `notmuch-tag' function was too strict and did
not allow nmbug tags with ::. Since the check is done for all
tagging operations in Emacs UI, this basically means that no nmbug
tags can be changed. The patch relaxes the tag syntax check to allow
any tag names that do not
Since `notmuch-tag' is a non-interactive function and hence is meant
to be invoked programmatically, it should accept zero tags. Also, the
tagging operations (bound to *, +, -) would accept empty input
without an error.
---
emacs/notmuch.el | 10 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5
This makes the argument names more consistent and clear. The
following functions changed: `notmuch-tag',
`notmuch-search-tag-thread', `notmuch-search-tag-region' and
`notmuch-search-tag-all'.
---
emacs/notmuch.el | 33 +
1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 16
---
NEWS | 18 ++
1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
index 5c5b645..f449fba 100644
--- a/NEWS
+++ b/NEWS
@@ -39,6 +39,24 @@ Reply to sender
and search modes, 'r' has been bound to reply to sender, replacing
reply to all, which now
On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 10:00:59 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> Hey, Dmitry. I'm so sorry I sent my last email on your original patch
> before I saw this new series. I do now like your original proposal
> better, since it shows the diff based the names the caller provides,
> which I now
On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 11:20:58 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 03:09:39 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin gmail.com> wrote:
> > [...]
> > I would prefer to put the whole second argument inside the quotes, not
> > just the variable.
> > [...]
> >
Hi Jameson.
On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 10:00:59 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> Hey, Dmitry. I'm so sorry I sent my last email on your original patch
> before I saw this new series.
No problems.
> I do now like your original proposal
> better, since it shows the diff based the names the
On Fri, 3 Feb 2012 23:01:23 -0700, Adam Wolfe Gordon awg+notm...@xvx.ca wrote:
Oh, and I just noticed that Dmitry has already fixed this, probably in
a better way [1] (though I maintain that there still may be a problem
with the approach in general). I clearly haven't been following the
list
Changes since v1:
* rebase on the current master, just one trivial conflict so no need
for another round of review
Regards,
Dmitry
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
The test is currently broken and will be fixed by a subsequent patch.
The patch adds a new file for tests of Emacs notmuch-show view.
Based on patch by David Edmondson [1].
[1] id:1327562380-12894-4-git-send-email-...@dme.org
---
test/emacs-show | 28
`Notmuch-wash-region-to-button' is the function that creates hidden
regions with buttons for signatures, citations and original messages.
Before the change, it did not work correctly if the to-be-hidden
region started at the beginning of a message: the visibility toggle
button was hidden as well.
On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 03:42:29 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote:
> Hi Jameson.
>
> On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:24:32 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins finestructure.net> wrote:
> > On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:37:53 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin > gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 01 Feb
The patch fixes tests which were broken by the new
test_expect_equal_file() argument check. Some tests have correct
filename format, but wrong argument order. Others require files to be
renamed.
---
test/crypto | 10 +-
test/dump-restore| 10 +-
test/hooks
Test_expect_equal_file() function treats the first argument as "actual
output file" and the second argument as "expected output file". When
the test fails, the files are copied for later inspection. The first
files is copied to "$testname.output" and the second file to
"$testname.expected". The
Hi all.
This is my second attempt to solve the test_expect_equal_file()
argument issue, based on Tomi's idea [1]. The first attempt and the
following discussion can be found here [2].
Regards,
Dmitry
[1] id:"m28vknaq5l.fsf at guru.guru-group.fi"
[2]
Hi Jameson.
On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:24:32 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:37:53 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 12:18:08 +0200, Tomi Ollila
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > There are at least these opt
Hi Pieter.
On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 21:32:32 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:06:05 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:44:48 +0100, Pieter Praet
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:13:48 +0400, Dmitry Kuro
On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 21:37:21 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> Thanks to Dmitry Kurochkin
> for pointing this out: id:"87d39ymyb4.fsf at gmail.com"
> ---
Looks good to me. Minor comments below.
> test/emacs |2 +-
> test/new |6 +++---
> 2 files changed,
Hi Pieter.
On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 21:32:32 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:06:05 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:44:48 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:13:48 +0400, Dmitry
Hi Jameson.
On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:24:32 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:37:53 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 12:18:08 +0200, Tomi Ollila tomi.oll...@iki.fi wrote:
There are at least
Hi all.
This is my second attempt to solve the test_expect_equal_file()
argument issue, based on Tomi's idea [1]. The first attempt and the
following discussion can be found here [2].
Regards,
Dmitry
[1] id:m28vknaq5l@guru.guru-group.fi
[2]
Test_expect_equal_file() function treats the first argument as actual
output file and the second argument as expected output file. When
the test fails, the files are copied for later inspection. The first
files is copied to $testname.output and the second file to
$testname.expected. The
The patch fixes tests which were broken by the new
test_expect_equal_file() argument check. Some tests have correct
filename format, but wrong argument order. Others require files to be
renamed.
---
test/crypto | 10 +-
test/dump-restore| 10 +-
test/hooks
On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 03:42:29 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jameson.
On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:24:32 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:37:53 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote
Hi Jameson.
On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 10:00:59 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
Hey, Dmitry. I'm so sorry I sent my last email on your original patch
before I saw this new series.
No problems.
I do now like your original proposal
better, since it shows the diff
On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:46:19 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 09:23:40 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> > On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 13:14:45 -0400, David Bremner
> > wrote:
> > > On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:55:22 +0200, Jani Nikula
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Jan 28, 2012 2:41 PM, "David
On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:51:37 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 06:49:39 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Aaron.
> >
> > Thanks for your work! I took the liberty to do some cleanups for your
> > patch. Below is a detailed lis
On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:44:48 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:13:48 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Pieter.
> >
> > On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 08:45:50 +0100, Pieter Praet
> > wrote:
> > > `notmuch-search-operate-al
On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 12:18:08 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
>
> There are at least these options here
>
> 1) go through all ~100 places where test_expect_equal_file is used
>and fix the call order: quick look tells that the offending uses
>are in dump-restore, hooks, search-limiting and
On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 10:55:50 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 00:47:30 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins finestructure.net> wrote:
> > On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 11:19:54 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin > gmail.com> wrote:
> > > The down side of this approach is that
Before the change, test_expect_equal_file() function treated the first
argument as "actual output file" and the second argument as "expected
output file". When the test fails, the files are copied for later
inspection. The first files was copied to "$testname.output" and the
second file to
From: Aaron Ecay
Emacs message-mode uses certain text strings to indicate how to attach
files to outgoing mail. If these are present in the text of an email,
and a user is tricked into replying to the message, the user?s files
could be exposed.
---
NEWS |
From: Aaron Ecay
The test is broken at this time; the next commit will introduce a fix.
---
test/emacs| 12
test/emacs.expected-output/quote-mml-in-reply |7 +++
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
Hi Aaron.
Thanks for your work! I took the liberty to do some cleanups for your
patch. Below is a detailed list of changes.
Hope this helps.
Changes since v2:
* change patch names to be consistent with others:
- s/emacs:/test:/ for the test patch
- lower case the first word after colon
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:29:06 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Modify the show view key bindings as follows to make them more
> consistent:
>
> 'a' = Archive current message, then move to next message, or show next
> thread from search if at the last message in thread.
>
> 'A' = Archive each message
On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:44:48 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:13:48 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Pieter.
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 08:45:50 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
`notmuch-search-operate-all' (bound
101 - 200 of 1087 matches
Mail list logo