Hi,
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Michal Sojka wrote:
> as you can read bellow, I'd like to use git's test-lib.sh in a GPLv3
> project. Do you mind if I use your work in that file under GPLv3?
I do not mind, but I would like to ask that you contribute the
improvements back under GPLv2.
Thanks,
Johanne
Hi,
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 11:39:04 +0100 (CET), Johannes Schindelin
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Michal Sojka wrote:
> >
> > > as you can read bellow, I'd like to use git's test-lib.sh in a GPLv3
> > &
aldomain>
>
> and explicitly agreed to by Junio C Hamano, Sverre Rabbelier, Johannes
> Schindelin, Pierre Habouzit, and Johannes Sixt.
As promised:
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin
Ciao,
Dscho
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
Hi,
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010, Tay Ray Chuan wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Junio C Hamano
> wrote:
> > FWIW, I only said "_at least_ you need consent from them", and it was
> > not meant to be an exhaustive list. "blame -C -C -C" may tell you
> > more.
>
> Without substantial analysi
Hi,
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Michal Sojka wrote:
> as you can read bellow, I'd like to use git's test-lib.sh in a GPLv3
> project. Do you mind if I use your work in that file under GPLv3?
I do not mind, but I would like to ask that you contribute the
improvements back under GPLv2.
Thanks,
Johanne
Hi,
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 11:39:04 +0100 (CET), Johannes Schindelin
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Michal Sojka wrote:
> >
> > > as you can read bellow, I'd like to use git's test-lib.sh in a GPLv3
> > &
ick.localdomain>
>
> and explicitly agreed to by Junio C Hamano, Sverre Rabbelier, Johannes
> Schindelin, Pierre Habouzit, and Johannes Sixt.
As promised:
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin
Ciao,
Dscho
Hi,
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010, Tay Ray Chuan wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Junio C Hamano
> wrote:
> > FWIW, I only said "_at least_ you need consent from them", and it was
> > not meant to be an exhaustive list. ?"blame -C -C -C" may tell you
> > more.
>
> Without substantial analysi