Re: [notmuch] Using test-lib.sh under GPLv3?

2010-02-16 Thread Junio C Hamano
Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz writes: ... You are mentioned as a copyright holder in test-lib.sh and t-basic.sh so I'd like to ask you: Would you mind using parts of these files under GPLv3? I don't mind for the parts I wrote, which is the basic infrastructure (output redirection,

[notmuch] Using test-lib.sh under GPLv3?

2010-02-16 Thread Junio C Hamano
Michal Sojka writes: > ... You are mentioned > as a copyright holder in test-lib.sh and t-basic.sh so I'd like to > ask you: Would you mind using parts of these files under GPLv3? I don't mind for the parts I wrote, which is the basic infrastructure (output redirection, skipping certain

[notmuch] [PATCH] test-lib.sh: Add explicit license detail, with change from GPLv2 to GPLv2+.

2010-02-20 Thread Junio C Hamano
focus=140156 so that people can see the consent from the primary author (that is where the focus is), the original request (that can be seen by looking at its immediate parent), and messages with consent from other contributors, all in one place. > and explicitly agreed to by Junio C Hamano,

[notmuch] [PATCH] test-lib.sh: Add explicit license detail, with change from GPLv2 to GPLv2+.

2010-02-22 Thread Junio C Hamano
e the next time. > The relicensing was agreed to by Junio C Hamano here: > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.mail.notmuch.general/1389/focus=140156 > > and in follow-up messages by Sverre Rabbelier, Johannes Schindelin, > Pierre Habouzit, and Johannes Sixt. FWIW, I only said "