On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 22:01:05 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> Quoth David Edmondson on Jan 15 at 11:55 am:
> > On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 10:29:31 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> > > Might I ask, to what key(chord) have you bound this ? Due to its
> > > usefulness, I'm incl
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 12:58:40 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> Yes. I was mostly reiterating the IRC discussion for Pieter. Since
> this discussion, I've stabilized on the pre-fetching notion I described
> in id:"20120115003617.gh1...@mit.edu",
Will read when I get there.
> though I do think we
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 22:03:17 +0100, Xavier Maillard wrote:
> Have you planned to cook something about this in notmuch wiki ?
> That sounds like something I could use to test patches more easily than
> I do currently.
I'll do so.
> Note: I am totally a dummy when I have to use git :/
Me too, hen
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 15:40:26 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
> This patch looks fine. Philosophical UI discussion to follow:
>
> On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 18:07:04 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> > +if (notmuch_config_get_auto_exclude_tags (config, &tmp) == NULL) {
> > + const char *tags[]
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 12:16:35 +, Mark Walters
wrote:
> Mark Walters (1):
> Make buttons for attachments allow viewing as well as saving
>
> emacs/notmuch-show.el | 81 ++--
> 1 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
Nice changes.
p
+2 for the whole set :-)
pgpKfrznllmVK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
Given the discussion that followed this patch I'd like to mark it as
'obsolete'.
Any objections?
pgpusAEJtQy7A.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
Daniel, there was a bunch of feedback from Dmitry about the patch and a
couple of other comments.
Do you plan to produce a new version?
It would be good to get this applied - it allows us to address various
comments that have been made about unifying the different search
mechanisms and looks gene
Nice work. +1 for me.
pgpDMWsazb79Y.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:42:31 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> CLisp'ier version of `notmuch-cycle-notmuch-buffers', merged into `notmuch',
> eliminating the need to hog yet another keybind.
The lisp-ier-ness changes are good.
I'm less sure about the functional change. Sometimes I want to go back
to
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:56:40 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> Less code, same results, without sacrificing readability.
+1.
pgpCDwvNS4sYk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listin
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:17:03 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> Alas, those text properties actually *were* effective (and I liked them :)
Well, not in emacs 24. My reading of the source was that overlays were
intended to stomp on text properties, but that could have been wrong.
Do they look correct w
On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 14:12:26 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> Add various functions to print notmuch messages and tie them together
> with a simple frontend. No keybinding is currently made to encourage
> paper saving.
Could someone review my lisp please?
bremner suggested that
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 16:09:23 +0200, Michal Sojka wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Oct 2011, Daniel Schoepe wrote:
> > Fixed that and rebased against master.
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I've an improvement for your patches. Recently, I decided to speed up
> notmuch hello startup times and I found that hiding a section
On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 08:14:52 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
> Before the change, there were two ways to do search in Emacs UI:
> search widget in notmuch-hello buffer and `notmuch-search'
> function bound to "s". Internally, notmuch-hello search widget
> uses `notmuch-search' function. But it u
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:31:11 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
>
> Hmmm, `dnsdomainname' returns "(none)" here; Does it work for you?
>
> Running `domainname' instead seems to do the right thing though...
>
I make no claims to have "correctly" configured this machine on my home
network, but here it
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:23:43 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> "Worldwide, -ize endings prevail in scientific writing and are commonly
> used by many international organizations, such as the ISO and the
> WHO. The European Union switched from -ize to -ise some years ago in its
> English language public
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:23:44 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> + (make-text-button string-start string-end
> 'action `(lambda (arg)
> -(notmuch-show ,(match-string-no-properties
> 0)))
> +(notmuch-show-if-found
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:23:45 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> + 'face (cond
> +((notmuch-show-found-target-p message-id t)
> +
> 'notmuch-show-buttonized-link-present-and-unread)
> +((notmuch-show-
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:28:06 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> Perhaps we could use `ido-completion-help', like Org-mode does with
> `org-iswitchb' ? OTOH, that would require an extra [RET]. Bah...
I'm a no-ido person.
> > Hmm, yes, that seems reasonable.
> >
> > > FYI: causes 2 compile warnings d
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:39:14 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
> > Dmitry, if Daniel re-submits his patches to allow the construction of
> > `notmuch-hello' buffers to be configured, it seems that this patchset
> > would become unnecessary. Is that correct?
>
> Right. We will just need to fix the
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 19:36:17 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> ...there are several levels of structure here:
>
> 1. Threads (query results)
> 2. Thread structure
> 3. Message structure (MIME)
> 4. Part content
>
> Currently, search returns 1; show --format=json returns 2, 3, and
> sometimes 4 (bu
Enable the truncation of lines in `notmuch-show-mode' to avoid visual
noise caused by the wrapping of the header lines.
Don't enable `visual-line-mode' because it disables line truncation.
The benefits of `visual-line-mode' were that it wrapped long lines
in received messages. With `notmuch-wash-
On Wed, 7 Dec 2011 22:13:06 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> From: David Bremner
>
> Installing w3m-el provides a nicer out of the box experience for
> viewing html in notmuch, and the overhead is not too bad (about 5M
> diskspace).
Given the discussion, should th
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:50:45 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Dec 2011 22:13:06 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> > From: David Bremner
> >
> > Installing w3m-el provides a nicer out of the box experience for
> > viewing html in notmuch, and the overhe
"test_expect_emacs_t" expects a single argument. If this is `t' then
the test passes. Otherwise the argument provides the details of the
test failure to be reported.
---
For use in the following set of tests and later for other emacs related tests.
test/test-lib.sh | 20
1
/emacs/notmuch-test.el
new file mode 100644
index 000..d6cf318
--- /dev/null
+++ b/emacs/notmuch-test.el
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+;; notmuch-test.el --- testing the emacs interface
+;;
+;; Copyright © David Edmondson
+;;
+;; This file is part of Notmuch.
+;;
+;; Notmuch is free software: you can
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:46:55 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> Make `notmuch-cycle-notmuch-buffers' more Lispy and merge into `notmuch',
> eliminating the need to hog yet another keybind.
...
> diff --git a/emacs/notmuch.el b/emacs/notmuch.el
> index ef4dcc7..539b3a0 100644
> --- a/emacs/notmuch.el
> +
Nice. +1.
pgp4Zu6XzBoRq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
+1.
pgpXMtwxK7O41.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
`mail-header-parse-address' expects un-decoded mailbox parts, which is
not what we have at this point. Replace it with simple string
deconstruction.
---
Fix the failing test in the previous set.
emacs/notmuch-show.el | 48 +++-
1 files changed, 35 in
Remove backslashes.
---
Including a new test case.
emacs/notmuch-show.el | 14 +-
emacs/notmuch-test.el |6 --
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/emacs/notmuch-show.el b/emacs/notmuch-show.el
index 02819f3..6b9d1b8 100644
--- a/emacs/notmuch-sho
I asked for feedback on the approach of implementing tests in .el[1] and
got only positive feedback (well, only one bit of feedback at all).
Here are some simpler tests implemented using this approach, trying to
address the concerns about seeing what failed. The test output is now
something like:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:41:09 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 16:47:33 +0000, David Edmondson wrote:
> > ---
> >
> > Add three tests. The third one currently fails.
> >
>
> I do not like that we add testing code to emacs/ folder. My
>
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 21:50:22 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
> Isn't this function the same as something like "test_expect_equal $x
> t"?
Yes, except that it differs in how it reports differences.
> IMO the function seems too complex for what it does (and basically that
> is "compare $x with t")
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 22:06:15 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Since this patches got in, I have yet to send a single email to the
> address(es) I intend to :( I am really used to the bindings and this
> change is a pain. From IRC discussion, it seems like I am not alone
> here.
>
>
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 22:06:15 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
>
> If others like it, how about reverting to the old bindings until the new
> ones are implemented?
>
Flip-flopping the bindings will just cause more confusion, in my opinion.
It is easy (and documented in the wiki) to customize the
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:51:30 -0500, Aaron Ecay wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:22:27 +0000, David Edmondson wrote:
> > On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:17:03 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> > > Alas, those text properties actually *were* effective (and I liked them :)
> >
>
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 22:21:03 +0200, Andrei Popescu
wrot>
> $ notmuch count 'Debian'
> 65888
> $ notmuch count '*ebian'
> 3
> $ notmuch count '?ebian'
> 3
> $ notmuch count 'ebian'
> 3
> $ notmuch count '0ebian'
You have to delve into the mysteries of xapian query parsing
unfortunately.
The sho
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 19:17:32 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> This fixes the symbol visibility warning Jamie pointed out.
Third time the charm.
pushed.
Please (somebody) consider writing NEWS and man page updates.
d
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@n
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 23:49:49 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> If a message was received to the user's address that was in a named
> group list, notmuch reply does not use that address for picking the
> from address.
Pushed.
d
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuc
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:21:24 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> I'm leaning to revert this patch. Any opposition?
Please revert it and I'll investigate further.
pgp2sWrScOERx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@no
Much nicer now that it uses the mm stuff.
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:13:23 -0700, Adam Wolfe Gordon
wrote:
> +(defun find-parts (parts type)
Sorry for being a nuisance - this needs a name that indicates that it
relates to notmuch. How about `notmuch-parts-filter-by-type'?
> + "Return a list of me
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 08:17:49 +0100, Gregor Zattler wrote:
> Hi Adam, notmuch developers,
> * Adam Wolfe Gordon [16. Jan. 2012]:
> > Add a customization option, notmuch-mua-reply-quoth, which controls
> > the first line of the reply body (typically, "On %date%, %from% wrote:").
> > This allows use
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:16:24 -0700, Jeremy Nickurak wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 12:28, Austin Clements wrote:
> >> Having "deleted" and "spam" as default settings in the configuration
> >> file might be more reasonable.
>
> If I read correctly:
>
> 1) If no exclude options are in the confi
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 16:27:06 -0500, Aaron Ecay wrote:
> > +;;
>
> The above is just a stray comment line, right?
I tend to use them as spacers, but, sure.
> > +(defun notmuch-show-with-message-as-text (fn)
> > + "Apply function `fn' to a text representation of the current
> > +message."
>
> I
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 23:48:30 -0500, Antoine Beaupré
wrote:
> Jumping in here, I have modified the previously posted code here to
> provide me with a more complete solution.
This looks good. I'll switch over to using it.
> Code is attached. Obviously, those function names would change if they
>
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:00:15 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> In NEWS file, indentation for item descriptions is generally 2 spaces
> but in a few cases there were 3 or 4 (4 caused different markdown
> handling) space indentations. Indentation in those lines are brought
> to consistent 2-space indentat
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 07:22:42 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:21:24 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> > I'm leaning to revert this patch. Any opposition?
>
> Please revert it and I'll investigate further.
Reverted.
d
__
From: David Bremner
We had a lot of back and forth about the name of this directory, but
nothing very conclusive. In the end, I just chose "devel" just to move
on.
---
RELEASING => devel/RELEASING |0
TODO => devel/TODO |0
2 files changed, 0 insertions
Add a new test function to allow simpler testing of emacs
functionality.
`test_emacs_expect_t' takes two arguments:
- the name of the test,
- some lisp to evaluate.
The test passes if the lisp returns `t', otherwise it fails and the
output is reported to the tester.
---
test/emacs-test-funct
`mail-header-parse-address' expects un-decoded mailbox parts, which is
not what we have at this point. Replace it with simple string
deconstruction.
---
emacs/notmuch-show.el | 48 +++-
1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/e
Taking Dmitry's suggestions on board. The end result does indeed feel
better, thanks!
[PATCH 1/4] test: Add `test_emacs_expect_t'.
[PATCH 2/4] test: Add address cleaning tests.
[PATCH 3/4] emacs: Avoid `mail-header-parse-address' in
[PATCH 4/4] emacs: Another special case for
_
Remove backslashes.
---
emacs/notmuch-show.el| 14 +-
test/address-cleaning.el |6 --
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/emacs/notmuch-show.el b/emacs/notmuch-show.el
index 8b2fbb3..90c9c05 100644
--- a/emacs/notmuch-show.el
+++ b/emacs/notmuc
Including some more test framework in test-lib.el.
---
test/address-cleaning.el | 29 +
test/address-cleaning.sh | 11 +++
test/notmuch-test|1 +
test/test-lib.el | 29 +
4 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 0
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:11:58 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
> Since test/ directory is used for all kind of tests not just Emacs
> UI-specific, so I think address-cleaning.* files should be
> emacs-address-cleaning.
Okay.
pgpjWFrQsKV9M.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
(And one for the list...)
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:09:35 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
> -1
>
> This is not what I suggested. I do not like the approach when a single
> function is used to both declare a subtest and test for result (as
> opposed to test_begin_subtest). The fact that it is poss
---
test/test-lib.sh |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/test/test-lib.sh b/test/test-lib.sh
index d1fbc05..7c9ce24 100644
--- a/test/test-lib.sh
+++ b/test/test-lib.sh
@@ -926,7 +926,7 @@ test_emacs () {
--eval '(orphan-watchdo
Including some more test framework in test-lib.el.
---
notmuch-test-address-cleaning-3 currently fails, in order that you can
see the output format in that case.
test/emacs-address-cleaning.el | 29 +
test/emacs-address-cleaning.sh | 12
test/notmuch-
Add a new test function to allow simpler testing of emacs
functionality.
`test_emacs_expect_t' takes one argument - a list expression to
evaluate. The test passes if the expression returns `t', otherwise it
fails and the output is reported to the tester.
---
Re-worked as Dmitry suggested.
test/
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:24:45 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
> This makes `show-trailing-whitespace' happy, i.e. it does not mark the
> whole search box line as trailing spaces.
Why should `whitespace-mode' be active in `notmuch-hello' buffers?
pgpEE8lecgUob.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:13:26 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 14:08:58 +0000, David Edmondson wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:24:45 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
> > wrote:
> > > This makes `show-trailing-whitespace' happy, i.e. it does not mark th
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:26:41 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
> Sorry, I still do not understand why we can not implement
> test_emacs_expect_t() like:
>
> result=${test_emacs $@}
> test_expect_equal $result t
>
> Can you please explain?
In the failure case test_expect_equal does:
test_fa
(And for the list...)
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:20:04 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
> Can you please elaborate why this is needed?
This code:
# wait until the emacs server is up
until test_emacs '()' 2>/dev/null; do
sleep 1
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:49:36 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
> > + # We cannot call 'test_emacs' in a subshell, because
> > + # the setting of EMACS_SERVER would not persist
> > + # throughout a sequence of tests, so we use a
> > + # temporary file.
> > +
>(if (and force (re-search-forward "<#secure [> >]*>\n" nil t))
> (replace-match "" nil nil))
>;; If we can encrypt, do so, else just sign.
>(if (or force (not (re-search-forward "<#secure [> >]*>\n" nil t)))
Is this second test for `force' necessary? If `force' is
+1.
pgpAZYyk0EXbW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 20:16:03 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> ---
> .gitignore |1 -
> man/.gitignore |2 ++
pushed,
d
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 08:47:51 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> From: David Bremner
>
pushed.
I need to find time to look at the uncrustify config again before I push
that.
d
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchma
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:53:37 -0700, Adam Wolfe Gordon
wrote:
> +(defun notmuch-parts-filter-by-type (parts type)
> + "Return a list of message parts with the given type"
> + (let (result)
> +(dolist (part (append parts nil) result)
> + (if (string= (cdr (assq 'content-type part)) type)
-0,0 +1,85 @@
+;; notmuch-print.el --- printing messages from notmuch.
+;;
+;; Copyright © David Edmondson
+;;
+;; This file is part of Notmuch.
+;;
+;; Notmuch is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify it
+;; under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+;; the Free So
Very happy with the overall ideas.
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:05:26 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
> -(defun notmuch-show-archive-thread-internal (show-next)
> - ;; Remove the tag from the current set of messages.
> +(defun notmuch-show-tag-thread-internal (tag &optional remove)
> + ;; Add ta
+1.
pgpiBtWVmyHt6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
+1.
pgpmQNrG3IoQL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:05:29 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
> -(defun notmuch-show-next-open-message ()
> +(defun notmuch-show-next-open-message (&optional pop-at-end)
>"Show the next message."
>(interactive)
> - (let (r)
> + (let ((r)
> + (parent-buffer notmuch-show-parent-buf
+1.
pgpxIDMWtKOaN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 12:17:54 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:10:40 -0500, Aaron Ecay wrote:
> > This should be a docstring instead of a comment. (This applies equally
> > to the old version)
>
> We're not currently in the habit of adding doc strings for
> non-i
Add the bindings. Provide documentation that makes it clear that they
just add tags and never delete anything.
pgp3b1CEVBlBs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
Looks fine.
pgpvjhm6aqI2W.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 23:34:09 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
> There are two ways to do search in Emacs UI: search widget in
> notmuch-hello buffer and `notmuch-search' function bound to "s".
> Before the change, these search mechanisms used different history
> lists. The patch makes notmuch-hell
+1.
pgpZyJWo7ibRf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:32:11 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> Quoth David Edmondson on Jan 17 at 9:08 am:
> > On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:16:24 -0700, Jeremy Nickurak
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 12:28, Austin Clements wrote:
> > > >> Having &quo
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:47:11 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
> > > (while (and (setq r (notmuch-show-goto-message-next))
> > > (not (notmuch-show-message-visible-p
> > > (if r
> > > (progn
> > > (notmuch-show-mark-read)
> > > (notmuch-show-message-adjust))
>
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:52:09 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 08:38:23 +0000, David Edmondson wrote:
> > Something must create the initial configuration file if none exists. I'd
> > be okay with that code adding 'deleted' and 'spam&
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 11:03:09 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> > [...] What's wrong with '(loop ... collect ...)'?
>
> Nothing at all. I was fixing my own patch [1] without resorting to
> requiring the `cl' package at runtime :) Would be nice if we could
> get rid of the compile-time dependency as w
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:15:55 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:13:35 +0000, David Edmondson wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 11:03:09 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> > > > [...] What's wrong with '(loop ... collect ...)'?
> > >
> &
Here's something that I was playing with this morning. It's not
finished, but has some nasty corners, so I'd like to solicit opinion on
whether it's worth finishing.
When faced with a long thread where most of the messages are closed, it
might be convenient to hide large stretches of closed header
Hi All;
Here is a very early stage proposal to provide tagging macros for
notmuch show mode.
The idea is that user defines a mapping from single key to a sequence of
tagging operations. It might be nice if there as some kind of pop-up
menu, or at least a prompt, but I didn't do that so far.
T
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:45:06 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> Here is a very early stage proposal to provide tagging macros for
> notmuch show mode.
Nice idea. Please make it work on regions as well.
pgp9jDOp95V8d.pgp
Description: PGP sig
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 09:32:34 -0700, Adam Wolfe Gordon
wrote:
> Using the new JSON reply format allows emacs to quote HTML
> parts nicely by using mm-display-part to turn them into displayable
> text, then quoting them. This is very useful for users who
> regularly receive HTML-only email.
>
> Th
The `mm-inlinable-p' and `mm-inlined-p' functions work better if they
have access to the data of the relevant part, so load that content
before calling either function.
This fixes the display of attached image/jpeg parts, for example.
---
I dropped this on the floor after discussing it in #notmuc
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:33:13 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> + ;; Nonsense required to have the new gnus `shr' HTML
> + ;; display code work.
> + (let ((gnus-inhibit-images nil))
> + (makunbound 'gnus-summary-buffer) ; Blech.
> +
The `mm-inlinable-p' and `mm-inlined-p' functions work better if they
have access to the data of the relevant part, so load that content
before calling either function.
This fixes the display of attached image/jpeg parts, for example.
---
Removed the cruft that crept into the previous patch.
em
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 21:57:27 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
> > The test output updates included here should be with the previous patch,
> > shouldn't they?
>
> Indeed. Would send v2.
That's not necessary for me.
> > Should user-typed queries be trimmed?
>
> IMO that would not hurt. But we
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 22:04:36 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:39:31 +0000, David Edmondson wrote:
> > The `mm-inlinable-p' and `mm-inlined-p' functions work better if they
> > have access to the data of the relevant part, so load that content
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 13:33:04 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> Quoth David Bremner on Jan 18 at 10:45 am:
> What about simply providing an API that takes a bunch of tag
> operations and applies them to the current thread/message/region?
My main motivation here is (as you can probably see
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:50:50 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
>
> I've been wanting to put together a wiki page that lists all the useful
> functions and has examples of how to put them together into useful
> functions.
>
If we're going to go the way of providing a toolkit/api for uses to m
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 18:15:37 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
>
> Can't we just use the emacs build-in documentation?
>
If you mean docstrings, that is only per function/variable. Which is
better than nothing, but not very good for getting an overview of what
is going on. Otherwise, info
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 19:40:11 -0500, Austin Clements wrote:
> +/* See handle_sigint in notmuch-new.c for the justification for
> + * ignoring write's result. */
> +IGNORE_RESULT (write (2, msg, sizeof(msg)-1));
Just include the comment in both places. Someone will work over the code
in
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 23:00:15 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
wrote:
> > That would allow a sane default (("image/*" "text/*") perhaps), but also
> > allow more to be added to that list (or some to be removed), either by
> > code that detected the (in)ability to render it or the user.
>
> Perhaps there i
501 - 600 of 14205 matches
Mail list logo
