How to use BBDB address completion instead of internal
Hi, I recently updated from an older version of notmuch, using BBDB for address book. I don't care for the internal address completion and want to continue using BBDB. I don't see BBDB as an option for notmuch-address-command, and if I disable the internal completion I get no completion at all. How to I get back to using normal BBDB integration with message-mode? Thanks, Allan ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
Bug/Issue: References header doesn't wrap in emacs package
Notmuch/0.20.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1 Replying to a message in a deeply nested thread can trigger a complaint: sendmail: command failed: 550 5.7.1 Delivery not authorized, message refused: Message is not RFC 2822 compliant The problem is a References header that is too long/not wrapped. Regards, Allan ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
Re: notmuch, OpenBSD issues
David Mazieres dm-list-email-notm...@scs.stanford.edu writes: I'm using notmuch 0.17 on openbsd (from the ports tree). My problem is that notmuch new is just unbearably slow. I don't know if it's because I'm running the 32-bit (i386) mode or what, but it takes over one second per mail message. E.g., this is typical of what I see when checking for new mail: Processed 18 total files in 20s (0 files/sec.). Added 5 new messages to the database. Linux is 10 times faster. Have you seen any similar performance issues? I didn't realize there was a port. I don't see it in my tree (amd64, recent 5.5-current). I've been building from the git repo. Anyway, yes I have seen similar on an older Mac OS X install I have at home on a G4 PowerBook. I haven't had unbearably slow performance on my amd64 OpenBSD installation, but there is sometimes a noticable lag. I wonder if it would help to enable softupdates on the partition where your database lives? http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq14.html#SoftUpdates Allan ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
notmuch, OpenBSD issues
David Mazieres writes: > I'm using notmuch 0.17 on openbsd (from the ports tree). My problem is > that notmuch new is just unbearably slow. I don't know if it's because > I'm running the 32-bit (i386) mode or what, but it takes over one second > per mail message. E.g., this is typical of what I see when checking for > new mail: > > Processed 18 total files in 20s (0 files/sec.). > Added 5 new messages to the database. > > Linux is 10 times faster. Have you seen any similar performance issues? I didn't realize there was a port. I don't see it in my tree (amd64, recent 5.5-current). I've been building from the git repo. Anyway, yes I have seen similar on an older Mac OS X install I have at home on a G4 PowerBook. I haven't had "unbearably" slow performance on my amd64 OpenBSD installation, but there is sometimes a noticable lag. I wonder if it would help to enable softupdates on the partition where your database lives? http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq14.html#SoftUpdates Allan
