Unison + notmuch?

2013-06-13 Thread James Vasile
I'm tempted to see if unison can keep two notmuch databases in sync. Before I play with this concept, I was wondering if anybody with unison experience had already tried this. I didn't see anything in the list archive/wiki/web. So any advice before I accidentally destroy my database (aside from

Unison + notmuch?

2013-06-13 Thread James Vasile
I'm tempted to see if unison can keep two notmuch databases in sync. Before I play with this concept, I was wondering if anybody with unison experience had already tried this. I didn't see anything in the list archive/wiki/web. So any advice before I accidentally destroy my database (aside from

[PATCH] fix notmuch_database_open call in addrlookup

2012-11-07 Thread James Vasile
James Vasile writes: > Ethan Glasser-Camp writes: > >> James Vasile writes: >> >>> What's the best way to submit changes to addrlookup? Right now, it is >>> out of date vs the latest libnotmuch. The addrlookup repo is vala code >>> but the wiki [1]

[PATCH] fix notmuch_database_open call in addrlookup

2012-11-07 Thread James Vasile
Ethan Glasser-Camp writes: > James Vasile writes: > >> What's the best way to submit changes to addrlookup? Right now, it is >> out of date vs the latest libnotmuch. The addrlookup repo is vala code >> but the wiki [1] points to a generated c file [2]. >> >&g

[PATCH] don't show x-foo tags in search view

2012-11-07 Thread James Vasile
David Bremner writes: > James Vasile writes: > >> Austin, >> >> Thanks for the helpful comments. I redid the patch to take a list of >> regexps. That way users can banish different kinds of tags or simply >> list the tags themselves. I've responded to your

Re: [PATCH] don't show x-foo tags in search view

2012-11-07 Thread James Vasile
David Bremner da...@tethera.net writes: James Vasile ja...@hackervisions.org writes: Austin, Thanks for the helpful comments. I redid the patch to take a list of regexps. That way users can banish different kinds of tags or simply list the tags themselves. I've responded to your comments

Re: [PATCH] fix notmuch_database_open call in addrlookup

2012-11-07 Thread James Vasile
Ethan Glasser-Camp ethan.glasser.c...@gmail.com writes: James Vasile ja...@hackervisions.org writes: What's the best way to submit changes to addrlookup? Right now, it is out of date vs the latest libnotmuch. The addrlookup repo is vala code but the wiki [1] points to a generated c file [2

Re: [PATCH] fix notmuch_database_open call in addrlookup

2012-11-07 Thread James Vasile
James Vasile ja...@hackervisions.org writes: Ethan Glasser-Camp ethan.glasser.c...@gmail.com writes: James Vasile ja...@hackervisions.org writes: What's the best way to submit changes to addrlookup? Right now, it is out of date vs the latest libnotmuch. The addrlookup repo is vala code

[PATCH] fix notmuch_database_open call in addrlookup

2012-10-31 Thread James Vasile
What's the best way to submit changes to addrlookup? Right now, it is out of date vs the latest libnotmuch. The addrlookup repo is vala code but the wiki [1] points to a generated c file [2]. [1] http://github.com/spaetz/vala-notmuch/raw/static-sources/src/addrlookup.c [2]

[PATCH] fix notmuch_database_open call in addrlookup

2012-10-31 Thread James Vasile
What's the best way to submit changes to addrlookup? Right now, it is out of date vs the latest libnotmuch. The addrlookup repo is vala code but the wiki [1] points to a generated c file [2]. [1] http://github.com/spaetz/vala-notmuch/raw/static-sources/src/addrlookup.c [2]

[PATCH] don't show x-foo tags in search view

2012-10-30 Thread James Vasile
Damien Cassou writes: > On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 7:57 PM, James Vasile > wrote: >> My filters create tags like x-bogotrained-spam that are for internal >> bookkeeping. I don't mind seeing them in the 'show' view, but I didn't >> want them cluttering my 'search' view.

[PATCH] don't show x-foo tags in search view

2012-10-30 Thread James Vasile
Austin, Thanks for the helpful comments. I redid the patch to take a list of regexps. That way users can banish different kinds of tags or simply list the tags themselves. I've responded to your comments in text below the patch. --- emacs/notmuch.el | 26 +- 1 file

Re: [PATCH] don't show x-foo tags in search view

2012-10-30 Thread James Vasile
Austin, Thanks for the helpful comments. I redid the patch to take a list of regexps. That way users can banish different kinds of tags or simply list the tags themselves. I've responded to your comments in text below the patch. --- emacs/notmuch.el | 26 +- 1 file

Re: [PATCH] don't show x-foo tags in search view

2012-10-30 Thread James Vasile
Damien Cassou damien.cas...@gmail.com writes: On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 7:57 PM, James Vasile ja...@hackervisions.org wrote: My filters create tags like x-bogotrained-spam that are for internal bookkeeping. I don't mind seeing them in the 'show' view, but I didn't want them cluttering my

[PATCH] don't show x-foo tags in search view

2012-10-29 Thread James Vasile
This patch hides any tags in search view that match the regex specified in `notmuch-search-hide-tag-regex`. That variable can be set via setq or the customize interface. To hide all tags that begin with "x-" or "X-", set `notmuch-search-hide-tag-regex` to "^X-". --- emacs/notmuch.el | 16

[PATCH] don't show x-foo tags in search view

2012-10-29 Thread James Vasile
David Bremner writes: > James Vasile writes: > >> My filters create tags like x-bogotrained-spam that are for internal >> bookkeeping. I don't mind seeing them in the 'show' view, but I didn't >> want them cluttering my 'search' view. This patch omits x-foo and X-foo

[PATCH] don't show x-foo tags in search view

2012-10-29 Thread James Vasile
My filters create tags like x-bogotrained-spam that are for internal bookkeeping. I don't mind seeing them in the 'show' view, but I didn't want them cluttering my 'search' view. This patch omits x-foo and X-foo tags from the 'search' view. --- emacs/notmuch.el |7 ++- 1 file changed,

Notmuch search missing mail id

2012-10-29 Thread James Vasile
Tomi Ollila writes: > On Mon, Oct 29 2012, James Vasile wrote: > >> I received the attached piece of spam telling me about an exciting >> investment opportunity. Notmuch pulled it in to the database, noting >> the message id. But then it seems to stop paying attent

Notmuch search missing mail id

2012-10-29 Thread James Vasile
I received the attached piece of spam telling me about an exciting investment opportunity. Notmuch pulled it in to the database, noting the message id. But then it seems to stop paying attention to the message id. notmuch can find the mail when I search by the from field: $ notmuch search

Notmuch search missing mail id

2012-10-29 Thread James Vasile
I received the attached piece of spam telling me about an exciting investment opportunity. Notmuch pulled it in to the database, noting the message id. But then it seems to stop paying attention to the message id. notmuch can find the mail when I search by the from field: $ notmuch search

Re: Notmuch search missing mail id

2012-10-29 Thread James Vasile
Tomi Ollila tomi.oll...@iki.fi writes: On Mon, Oct 29 2012, James Vasile ja...@hackervisions.org wrote: I received the attached piece of spam telling me about an exciting investment opportunity. Notmuch pulled it in to the database, noting the message id. But then it seems to stop paying

[PATCH] don't show x-foo tags in search view

2012-10-29 Thread James Vasile
My filters create tags like x-bogotrained-spam that are for internal bookkeeping. I don't mind seeing them in the 'show' view, but I didn't want them cluttering my 'search' view. This patch omits x-foo and X-foo tags from the 'search' view. --- emacs/notmuch.el |7 ++- 1 file changed,

Re: [PATCH] don't show x-foo tags in search view

2012-10-29 Thread James Vasile
David Bremner da...@tethera.net writes: James Vasile ja...@hackervisions.org writes: My filters create tags like x-bogotrained-spam that are for internal bookkeeping. I don't mind seeing them in the 'show' view, but I didn't want them cluttering my 'search' view. This patch omits x-foo

Re: [PATCH] don't show x-foo tags in search view

2012-10-29 Thread James Vasile
This patch hides any tags in search view that match the regex specified in `notmuch-search-hide-tag-regex`. That variable can be set via setq or the customize interface. To hide all tags that begin with x- or X-, set `notmuch-search-hide-tag-regex` to ^X-. --- emacs/notmuch.el | 16

Re: [ANN] notmuch-labeler: Improves notmuch way of displaying labels

2012-10-25 Thread James Vasile
+1 for merging this upstream. Thanks. pgp4cp7eav2Sh.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch

[ANN] notmuch-labeler: Improves notmuch way of displaying labels

2012-10-24 Thread James Vasile
+1 for merging this upstream. Thanks. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 489 bytes Desc: not available URL:

JSON readtable error when replying

2012-04-30 Thread James Vasile
It's a JSON parsing error. I don't know if it's a known error, but it's not one I've seen chatter about on this list. I've gotten it too and haven't really looked into it. I suspect it is a bug in the Emacs JSON parsing function. but that I can only support that suspicion with hunches and

Re: JSON readtable error when replying

2012-04-30 Thread James Vasile
It's a JSON parsing error. I don't know if it's a known error, but it's not one I've seen chatter about on this list. I've gotten it too and haven't really looked into it. I suspect it is a bug in the Emacs JSON parsing function. but that I can only support that suspicion with hunches and

Why not tags inside messages?

2012-04-07 Thread James Vasile
On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 18:46:03 +0200, David Belohrad wrote: > Dear all, > > I'd love to use notmuch with offline imap ?to work rather on local > copy of messages, than using remote notmuch, which is slightly slower > due to bandwidth limitation of my vdsl line. There is however > fundamental

Re: Why not tags inside messages?

2012-04-07 Thread James Vasile
On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 18:46:03 +0200, David Belohrad da...@belohrad.ch wrote: Dear all, I'd love to use notmuch with offline imap  to work rather on local copy of messages, than using remote notmuch, which is slightly slower due to bandwidth limitation of my vdsl line. There is however

Passwordless multi-account SMTP

2012-04-03 Thread James Vasile
On Tue, 3 Apr 2012 17:29:07 +0200, Jacek Generowicz wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to use notmuch from Emacs. I have a number of SMTP accounts > through which I would need to send mail. Suggested solutions I have > found fall into 3 categories: > > + Gnus posting styles. (I'd rather stay clear

Re: Passwordless multi-account SMTP

2012-04-03 Thread James Vasile
On Tue, 3 Apr 2012 17:29:07 +0200, Jacek Generowicz jacek.generow...@cern.ch wrote: Hello, I'm trying to use notmuch from Emacs. I have a number of SMTP accounts through which I would need to send mail. Suggested solutions I have found fall into 3 categories: + Gnus posting styles. (I'd

[PATCH v2]: contrib/notmuch-mutt

2012-04-02 Thread James Vasile
I can't wait to give this a try. Thanks much! -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 489 bytes Desc: not available URL:

a DoS vulnerability associated with conflated Message-IDs?

2012-03-08 Thread James Vasile
On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 11:37:09 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > Any ideas on how to approach this? Treat messages with the same ID but different hashes as different? -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature

Re: a DoS vulnerability associated with conflated Message-IDs?

2012-03-08 Thread James Vasile
On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 11:37:09 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor d...@fifthhorseman.net wrote: Any ideas on how to approach this? Treat messages with the same ID but different hashes as different? pgpjtq6bzoxfs.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ notmuch

Possible bug in gpg signing replies

2012-03-01 Thread James Vasile
When using 'mml-secure-sign-pgpmime to sign one part of an email, valid sigs get attached to new emails but not to replies. Instead, when I reply to a message, the signing directive seems to be inserted as plain text and is not processed. Switching to the 'mml-secure-message-sign-pgpmime, which

Possible bug in gpg signing replies

2012-03-01 Thread James Vasile
When using 'mml-secure-sign-pgpmime to sign one part of an email, valid sigs get attached to new emails but not to replies. Instead, when I reply to a message, the signing directive seems to be inserted as plain text and is not processed. Switching to the 'mml-secure-message-sign-pgpmime, which

[afew] announcing afew, an universal tagging solution with some fancy features

2012-02-27 Thread James Vasile
I'm tring to figure out how to use afew. It looks interesting, but gives me surprising results. I did `afew --learn spam -- tag:spam` and believe this tells afew that all the messages matching tag:spam should be classified as spam. But if that is right, why would `afew -c spam -- tag:spam` then

Re: [afew] announcing afew, an universal tagging solution with some fancy features

2012-02-27 Thread James Vasile
I'm tring to figure out how to use afew. It looks interesting, but gives me surprising results. I did `afew --learn spam -- tag:spam` and believe this tells afew that all the messages matching tag:spam should be classified as spam. But if that is right, why would `afew -c spam -- tag:spam` then

BiDi

2012-02-02 Thread James Vasile
On Thu, 02 Feb 2012 09:44:07 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 20:08:14 +, Clint Adams wrote: > > I just received an email in RTL script and it was rendered incorrectly > > in the emacs interface. Does anyone know what to do about this? > > More info please. What

Displaying tags with many messages very slow in Emacs

2011-10-31 Thread James Vasile
On August 20th, I sent a message to this list (Message-ID: <87vctrq4or.fsf at hackervisions.org>) that limits the view to a small number threads. You can set the number of threads (or turn it off). I did this because I never want to page through more than a screen or two of threads. If I need

Re: Displaying tags with many messages very slow in Emacs

2011-10-31 Thread James Vasile
On August 20th, I sent a message to this list (Message-ID: 87vctrq4or@hackervisions.org) that limits the view to a small number threads. You can set the number of threads (or turn it off). I did this because I never want to page through more than a screen or two of threads. If I need more

[PATCH] Skip dot files in `notmuch new`

2011-08-23 Thread James Vasile
No known mail client or fetch tool stores mail in dot files, because files that start with '.' are usually used to store metadata (i.e. state or configuration) as opposed to subject-matter data. Some mail fetch tools (including mbsync) and clients use dot files in maildirs to store metadata.

Re: [PATCH] Do not query on notmuch-search exit

2011-08-22 Thread James Vasile
Thanks for this, Michal. I've applied it to my local tree. ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch

[PATCH] Return maximum of 150 results

2011-08-20 Thread James Vasile
On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 17:00:23 +0200, Michal Sojka wrote: > If you really want this behavior, I propose to make the default value > of notmuch-max-results infinity. I'm attaching a revised patch that does as you suggest. Thanks. -- next part -- A non-text attachment was

[PATCH] Added --initial-index and --last-index to search/show

2011-08-20 Thread James Vasile
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 12:21:26 +0100, Patrick Totzke wrote: Non-text part: multipart/mixed > > > Hi! > A very good idea indeed! This could become quite handy speeding up my > interface. > One question: What do you (intend to) do to ensure that accumulated results > 'add up well'? I intend to

Re: [PATCH] Added --initial-index and --last-index to search/show

2011-08-20 Thread James Vasile
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 12:21:26 +0100, Patrick Totzke patricktot...@googlemail.com wrote: Non-text part: multipart/mixed Hi! A very good idea indeed! This could become quite handy speeding up my interface. One question: What do you (intend to) do to ensure that accumulated results 'add up

Re: [PATCH] Return maximum of 150 results

2011-08-20 Thread James Vasile
Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: James Vasile ja...@hackervisions.org Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 14:58:47 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Limit number of threads returned by search in emacs Set notmuch-max-results to the maximum number of results the client should show. Setting notmuch-max-results to 0 (the default

[PATCH] Added --initial-index and --last-index to search/show

2011-08-19 Thread James Vasile
On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 11:55:11 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: Non-text part: multipart/signed > On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 23:09:54 -0400, James Vasile > wrote: > > This patch implements --initial-index and --last-index as options to > > search and show. It lets you select the x

[PATCH] Return maximum of 150 results

2011-08-19 Thread James Vasile
On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 18:00:36 +0200, Michal Sojka wrote: > > On my system, I routinely do searches that return 15000+ messages > > when I'm only interested in the first several. When I hit Q, Emacs > > annoyingly asks me for permission to kill the buffer because it has > > a running process. And

[PATCH] Return maximum of 150 results

2011-08-19 Thread James Vasile
On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 17:00:23 +0200, Michal Sojka wrote: > Hi James, > > On Fri, 19 Aug 2011, James Vasile wrote: > > Display a maximum of 150 results when searching for messages. This > > prevents client lag when searches return thousands of results you'll > >

[PATCH] Return maximum of 150 results

2011-08-19 Thread James Vasile
Display a maximum of 150 results when searching for messages. This prevents client lag when searches return thousands of results you'll never look at (use the Filter command to cut down results that exceed 150). Number of results can be changed by setting notmuch-max-results. This patch depends

[PATCH] Added --initial-index and --last-index to search/show

2011-08-19 Thread James Vasile
Sometimes you need to ask notmuch for just a few messages, and notmuch supports that with date range options. Date ranges, however, are not sufficient for an application that is paging and just wants message x through y, then x+d through y+d, etc. And if you're sending the json results of a

Re: [PATCH] Return maximum of 150 results

2011-08-19 Thread James Vasile
On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 17:00:23 +0200, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote: Hi James, On Fri, 19 Aug 2011, James Vasile wrote: Display a maximum of 150 results when searching for messages. This prevents client lag when searches return thousands of results you'll never look at I would

Re: [PATCH] Return maximum of 150 results

2011-08-19 Thread James Vasile
On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 18:00:36 +0200, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote: On my system, I routinely do searches that return 15000+ messages when I'm only interested in the first several. When I hit Q, Emacs annoyingly asks me for permission to kill the buffer because it has a running

[PATCH] Added --initial-index and --last-index to search/show

2011-08-18 Thread James Vasile
Sometimes you need to ask notmuch for just a few messages, and notmuch supports that with date range options. Date ranges, however, are not sufficient for an application that is paging and just wants message x through y, then x+d through y+d, etc. And if you're sending the json results of a

Undo tag operation?

2011-07-20 Thread James Vasile
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 09:48:53 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: Non-text part: multipart/mixed Non-text part: multipart/signed > On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:17:37 +0200, Alex Ghitza wrote: > > I just inadvertently removed the "todo" tag from all my "todo"-tagged > > emails (about 60 of them going

Re: Undo tag operation?

2011-07-20 Thread James Vasile
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 09:48:53 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: Non-text part: multipart/mixed Non-text part: multipart/signed On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 16:17:37 +0200, Alex Ghitza aghi...@gmail.com wrote: I just inadvertently removed the todo tag from all my todo-tagged

release-candidate/0.6

2011-05-09 Thread James Vasile
On Sun, 08 May 2011 17:57:48 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > On Fri, 06 May 2011 19:56:30 -0400, James Vasile > wrote: > > I sent two patches to the list on March 16. They were a bug fix to > > allow notmuch to correctly handle some poorly formatted email. Nobod

Re: release-candidate/0.6

2011-05-09 Thread James Vasile
On Sun, 08 May 2011 17:57:48 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: On Fri, 06 May 2011 19:56:30 -0400, James Vasile ja...@hackervisions.org wrote: I sent two patches to the list on March 16. They were a bug fix to allow notmuch to correctly handle some poorly

release-candidate/0.6

2011-05-06 Thread James Vasile
Thanks for pulling this together. I sent two patches to the list on March 16. They were a bug fix to allow notmuch to correctly handle some poorly formatted email. Nobody ever replied, but I'd like to see the bug fixed nonetheless, as it results in unreadable mail. Since I've actually seen

[PATCH] replace null terminator in string

2011-03-16 Thread James Vasile
In order to make the prior patch work for trailing whitespace, we also need this one. --- lib/thread.cc |2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/thread.cc b/lib/thread.cc index 7a816ea..54fde2b 100644 --- a/lib/thread.cc +++ b/lib/thread.cc @@ -291,6 +291,8

[PATCH] Remove/replace vertical whitespace in subject header field body.

2011-03-16 Thread James Vasile
RFC 822 specifies that headers are one-liners of ASCII: > The field-body may be composed of any ASCII characters, except CR or > LF. (While CR and/or LF may be present in the actual text, they are > removed by the action of unfolding the field.) RFC 5335 allows UTF-8 in header field bodies, but

[PATCH] replace null terminator in string

2011-03-16 Thread James Vasile
In order to make the prior patch work for trailing whitespace, we also need this one. --- lib/thread.cc |2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/thread.cc b/lib/thread.cc index 7a816ea..54fde2b 100644 --- a/lib/thread.cc +++ b/lib/thread.cc @@ -291,6 +291,8

python documentation

2011-03-15 Thread James Vasile
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 11:33:19 -0700, Jameson Rollins wrote: > On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:22:55 -0400, James Vasile > wrote: > > notmuch dump includes '# TODO: implement "dump "' but it > > appears to work already. What's missing? > > Hey, James. Is this related t

python documentation

2011-03-15 Thread James Vasile
notmuch dump includes '# TODO: implement "dump "' but it appears to work already. What's missing? Thanks, James

Re: python documentation

2011-03-15 Thread James Vasile
notmuch dump includes '# TODO: implement dump filename' but it appears to work already. What's missing? Thanks, James ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch

Re: python documentation

2011-03-15 Thread James Vasile
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 11:33:19 -0700, Jameson Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:22:55 -0400, James Vasile ja...@hackervisions.org wrote: notmuch dump includes '# TODO: implement dump filename' but it appears to work already. What's missing? Hey, James

Make MBox

2011-03-01 Thread James Vasile
On Tue, 01 Mar 2011 14:06:28 -0800, Jameson Rollins wrote: > On Tue, 01 Mar 2011 15:54:32 -0500, James Vasile > wrote: > > Sometimes I want to send a colleague a bunch of emails (for example, all > > the emails I've tagged todo or all the emails from an awesome > >

Make MBox

2011-03-01 Thread James Vasile
Sometimes I want to send a colleague a bunch of emails (for example, all the emails I've tagged todo or all the emails from an awesome contributor. Although notmuch usually speaks the language of maildirs, I find mboxes most convenient for attaching to emails. Their tools can usually handle it

Re: Make MBox

2011-03-01 Thread James Vasile
On Tue, 01 Mar 2011 14:06:28 -0800, Jameson Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: On Tue, 01 Mar 2011 15:54:32 -0500, James Vasile ja...@hackervisions.org wrote: Sometimes I want to send a colleague a bunch of emails (for example, all the emails I've tagged todo or all the emails from

DB Corruption

2011-02-22 Thread James Vasile
This email is a gentle reminder to back up your tags unless they are 100% mechanically generated. Last night, while testing some scripts that do a bunch of notmuch new, notmuch tag and notmuch search commands, I suddenly started getting an error: A Xapian exception occurred opening database: Db

DB Corruption

2011-02-17 Thread James Vasile
This email is a gentle reminder to back up your tags unless they are 100% mechanically generated. Last night, while testing some scripts that do a bunch of "notmuch new", "notmuch tag" and "notmuch search" commands, I suddenly started getting an error: "A Xapian exception occurred opening

Spam and mailing list filtering?

2011-02-17 Thread James Vasile
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 12:20:55 +, Daniel Barlow wrote: > 1) (How) can I filter on the X-Spam-Bar header to chop out spam and > suspected spam? I just integrated Spambayes into my notmuch toolchain. It's crude, but here's how it works: My script does `find -mtime 0 | xargs grep -L

social gathering during DebConf

2010-07-24 Thread James Vasile
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:56:51 -0400, Jameson Rollins wrote: > Hey, folks. For those of you that don't already know, David Bremner > will be hosting a birds-of-a-feather session on notmuch during DebConf > 10 in NYC [0] on Thursday, August 5 [1]. Even if you're not > specifically involved with

Re: social gathering during DebConf

2010-07-24 Thread James Vasile
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:56:51 -0400, Jameson Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: Hey, folks. For those of you that don't already know, David Bremner will be hosting a birds-of-a-feather session on notmuch during DebConf 10 in NYC [0] on Thursday, August 5 [1]. Even if you're not

[notmuch] bbdb import notmuch addresses

2010-03-25 Thread James Vasile
I used notmuch_address.py to scrape email addresses from notmuch and generate elisp to showve them into bbdb. Tab completion via bbdb is much faster than via notmuch_addresses. Run the script, execute the results in emacs. I didn't care enough to do any merging, so records that clash with

[notmuch] [PATCH] Name thread based on matching msgs instead of first msg.

2010-03-23 Thread James Vasile
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:09:15 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal wrote: > Reply prefixes ("Re: ", "Aw: ", "Sv: ", "Vs: ") are ignored Just out of curiosity, what are Aw, Sv and Vs used for? Are they just "re" in different languages? Thanks.

Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] Name thread based on matching msgs instead of first msg.

2010-03-23 Thread James Vasile
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:09:15 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal jrosent...@jhu.edu wrote: Reply prefixes (Re: , Aw: , Sv: , Vs: ) are ignored Just out of curiosity, what are Aw, Sv and Vs used for? Are they just re in different languages? Thanks. ___ notmuch

[notmuch] [PATCH] Change From and Bcc when creating reply draft buffer

2010-03-12 Thread James Vasile
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:49:35 +0100, Michal Sojka wrote: > On Thu, 11 Mar 2010, James Vasile wrote: > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:22:41 +0100, Michal Sojka > > wrote: > > > thanks for clarification. It all sounds reasonable. The only problem I > > > can see now

Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] Change From and Bcc when creating reply draft buffer

2010-03-12 Thread James Vasile
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:49:35 +0100, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote: On Thu, 11 Mar 2010, James Vasile wrote: On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:22:41 +0100, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote: thanks for clarification. It all sounds reasonable. The only problem I can see now

[notmuch] [PATCH] Change From and Bcc when creating reply draft buffer

2010-03-11 Thread James Vasile
" nil t) (kill-line) (insert (format "%s <%s>" user-full-name user-mail-address)) (defun mail-profile-hv () (interactive) (setq mail-host-address "hackervisions.org" user-full-name "James Vasile" message-sendmail-extra-argu

[notmuch] [PATCH] Change From and Bcc when creating reply draft buffer

2010-03-11 Thread James Vasile
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:00:08 +0100, Michal Sojka wrote: > Hi James, > > On Tue, 09 Mar 2010, James Vasile wrote: > > When notmuch creates a reply buffer, it guesses the From and Bcc > > addresses. The client is in a better position to guess these, and this > >

Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] Change From and Bcc when creating reply draft buffer

2010-03-11 Thread James Vasile
user-full-name user-mail-address)) (defun mail-profile-hv () (interactive) (setq mail-host-address hackervisions.org user-full-name James Vasile message-sendmail-extra-arguments '(-a hv) user-mail-address ja...@hackervisions.org) (message-mode-set-profile) user-mail

[notmuch] Any idea why my emacs doesn't want to accept my notmuch-folder keymap changes?

2010-03-10 Thread James Vasile
You have a typo: mot-much-folder-mode-map should be notmuch-folder-mode-map. (s/motmuch/notmuch/) On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:19:09 -0700, Mark R Anderson wrote: > I have added several keys to the search and show keymaps in my .emacs > file, but when my hook for notmuch-folder-mode generates

Re: [notmuch] Any idea why my emacs doesn't want to accept my notmuch-folder keymap changes?

2010-03-10 Thread James Vasile
You have a typo: mot-much-folder-mode-map should be notmuch-folder-mode-map. (s/motmuch/notmuch/) On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:19:09 -0700, Mark R Anderson markr.ander...@amd.com wrote: I have added several keys to the search and show keymaps in my .emacs file, but when my hook for

[notmuch] [PATCH] Change From and Bcc when creating reply draft buffer

2010-03-09 Thread James Vasile
When notmuch creates a reply buffer, it guesses the From and Bcc addresses. The client is in a better position to guess these, and this patch adjusts notmuch-reply accordingly. diff --git a/notmuch.el b/notmuch.el index ab56f48..07f957e 100644 --- a/notmuch.el +++ b/notmuch.el @@ -436,10 +436,20

[notmuch] [PATCH] compatibility with emacs22

2010-02-27 Thread James Vasile
Emacs22 lacks apply-partially and mouse-event-p, so define them if emacs version is less than 23. With this change, I was able to begin using notmuch in emacs22. apply-partially cribbed from http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/2009/000889.html This is an updated patch that fixes a bug in

[notmuch] Initial tagging

2010-02-27 Thread James Vasile
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 23:03:34 -0500, James Vasile wrote: > On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 20:33:08 -0500, micah anderson > wrote: > > > > Hey james, > > > > i really like your notmuch-retry bits, I've taken that shell script and > > integrated it into my taggin

[notmuch] [PATCH] Add shell script notmuch-retry

2010-02-26 Thread James Vasile
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:55:19 -0800, Carl Worth wrote: > On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 07:53:29 -0500, James Vasile > wrote: > > Maybe this retry loop should be put in notmuch itself? > > Perhaps it should. I've even imagined something that would queue a > request into a daemon

[notmuch] Initial tagging

2010-02-26 Thread James Vasile
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 20:33:08 -0500, micah anderson wrote: > > Hey james, > > i really like your notmuch-retry bits, I've taken that shell script and > integrated it into my tagging script, thanks! I'm curious if you are > going to update your patch for notmuch.el ("Calls to notmuch get queued >

[notmuch] Initial tagging

2010-02-26 Thread James Vasile
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:14:45 -0500, micah anderson wrote: > On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:25:16 -0500, James Vasile > wrote: > This stuff should go up on the wiki! There is a "Tips and Tricks for > using notmuch with Emacs" section, but more general things like James' >

[notmuch] [PATCH] Add shell script notmuch-retry

2010-02-26 Thread James Vasile
. +# +# Copyright 2010 James Vasile +# +# This is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify it +# under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by +# the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or +# (at your option) any later version. +# +# This software

[notmuch] [PATCH] Add shell script notmuch-retry

2010-02-26 Thread James Vasile
. +# +# Copyright 2010 James Vasile +# +# This is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify it +# under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by +# the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or +# (at your option) any later version. +# +# This software

Re: [notmuch] Initial tagging

2010-02-26 Thread James Vasile
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 20:33:08 -0500, micah anderson mi...@riseup.net wrote: Hey james, i really like your notmuch-retry bits, I've taken that shell script and integrated it into my tagging script, thanks! I'm curious if you are going to update your patch for notmuch.el (Calls to notmuch get

Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] Add shell script notmuch-retry

2010-02-26 Thread James Vasile
On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:55:19 -0800, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 07:53:29 -0500, James Vasile ja...@hackervisions.org wrote: Maybe this retry loop should be put in notmuch itself? Perhaps it should. I've even imagined something that would queue a request

[notmuch] Initial tagging

2010-02-25 Thread James Vasile
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:02:08 -0800, Carl Worth wrote: > One distinction is that I have all of my "notmuch tag" commands operate > globally rather than just on new messages. One of the things that really > annoyed be about sup was that the support for automatic tagging worked > as a hook on

[notmuch] Initial tagging

2010-02-25 Thread James Vasile
I'm slowly groping my way to using the notmuch emacs client as my routine MUA. As I coerce it into tagging and displaying the way I want, the next big question was automatically tagging things and getting them in to notmuch. I'm curious as to what people are doing in this regard. My solution

[notmuch] [PATCH] add notmuch-show-delete keybinding 'd'

2010-02-25 Thread James Vasile
At Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:53:14 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > > On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:01:18 -0500, Jameson Rollins finestructure.net> wrote: > > > 2. It removes the "inbox" and "unread" tags while adding the tag to > > >indicate deletion. > > > > Hey, Carl. Why is this last point

Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] add notmuch-show-delete keybinding 'd'

2010-02-25 Thread James Vasile
At Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:53:14 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:01:18 -0500, Jameson Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: 2. It removes the inbox and unread tags while adding the tag to indicate deletion. Hey, Carl. Why is this last point important?

  1   2   >