Use of "notmuch count" in notmuch-hello.el

2010-05-09 Thread Jason White
Sorry, it's my fault - there was still an old binary lying around. Apologies for the noise. I was sure I had deleted that...

Use of "notmuch count" in notmuch-hello.el

2010-05-08 Thread Jason White
for me. >From 1cd04171eb6051adc9a37d25ccf9e09504e7a944 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jason White <ja...@jasonjgw.net> Date: Sat, 8 May 2010 13:30:59 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] Correct invocation of notmuch count. --- emacs/notmuch-hello.el |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1

Re: Use of notmuch count in notmuch-hello.el

2010-05-08 Thread Jason White
Sorry, it's my fault - there was still an old binary lying around. Apologies for the noise. I was sure I had deleted that... ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch

Use of notmuch count in notmuch-hello.el

2010-05-07 Thread Jason White
for me. From 1cd04171eb6051adc9a37d25ccf9e09504e7a944 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jason White ja...@jasonjgw.net Date: Sat, 8 May 2010 13:30:59 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] Correct invocation of notmuch count. --- emacs/notmuch-hello.el |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff

Failing test cases

2010-04-28 Thread Jason White
Carl Worth wrote: > Is this behavior repeatable? I've certainly never seen anything like > this yet. It seems to be repeatable here, even after running git clean -d -f -x, followed by make && make test Is anyone else seeing this?

Failing test cases

2010-04-28 Thread Jason White
In case this is not expected behaviour for the latest code in the Git master branch, which is current up to 0.3.1: Testing author reordering; Adding parent message... FAIL --- test-066.expected 2010-04-27 16:15:48.273607558 -0800 +++ test-066.output

Re: Failing test cases

2010-04-27 Thread Jason White
In case this is not expected behaviour for the latest code in the Git master branch, which is current up to 0.3.1: Testing author reordering; Adding parent message... FAIL --- test-066.expected 2010-04-27 16:15:48.273607558 -0800 +++ test-066.output

Re: Failing test cases

2010-04-27 Thread Jason White
Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: Is this behavior repeatable? I've certainly never seen anything like this yet. It seems to be repeatable here, even after running git clean -d -f -x, followed by make make test Is anyone else seeing this? ___

Failing test cases

2010-04-25 Thread Jason White
I just tried to build the Debian package from the latest Git master branch, but this could not be completed due to failures of test cases 067, 068 and 069. Are others seeing this, or is it a peculiarity of my system (Debian Sid, x86-64)?

[PATCH] allow to not sort the search results

2010-04-14 Thread Jason White
Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > previously we were always sorting the returned results by some string value, > but sometimes we might just be interested in the number of results, and don't > need any sorting. > > Also add a --sort=unsorted command line option to notmuch search to test this. Does this

Re: [PATCH] allow to not sort the search results

2010-04-14 Thread Jason White
Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de wrote: previously we were always sorting the returned results by some string value, but sometimes we might just be interested in the number of results, and don't need any sorting. Also add a --sort=unsorted command line option to notmuch search to test

[notmuch] Message parsing issue?

2010-04-07 Thread Jason White
David Bremner wrote: > One thing I noticed was that the message you sent (at least, if I got > the correct attachment), had X-Spam headers _before_ the "From " > line. If I remove those headers then the message displays Ok. It is > probably not worth putting too much effort into that display

[notmuch] Bulk message tagging

2010-04-05 Thread Jason White
Xavier Maillard wrote: > Sadly, git is not really something I know wll enough to play with > all this stuff :( http://progit.org/book/

Re: [notmuch] Bulk message tagging

2010-04-05 Thread Jason White
Xavier Maillard x...@gnu.org wrote: Sadly, git is not really something I know wll enough to play with all this stuff :( http://progit.org/book/ ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch

[notmuch] Bulk message tagging

2010-04-04 Thread Jason White
Xavier Maillard wrote: > You are right I forgot to mention I am using the GNU Emacs > interface exclusively. Then it's the * command from the buffer with the mail threads dislayed. See also the ?h command for further help.

[notmuch] Bulk message tagging

2010-04-04 Thread Jason White
Xavier Maillard wrote: > Is there an easy way to mark a whole bunch of message (restricted > in a region, result of a search, ...) ? notmuch tag +|- [...] [--] [...] does this from the shell. If you want to do it from one of the user interfaces, it depends on which one you're using.

[notmuch] Message parsing issue?

2010-04-03 Thread Jason White
ack, rev 4624 (TRE 0.7.5 (LGPL, APPROX, WCHAR, MULTIBYTE)) MR-162E7357 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20100328_100035_938573_DC93E2E5 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 5.40 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. Remove CELT. /b On Mar 26, 2010, at 10:56 PM, Jason White wrote: > I am trying to test mod_silk with F

[notmuch] Message parsing issue?

2010-04-03 Thread Jason White
, 2010, at 10:56 PM, Jason White wrote: I am trying to test mod_silk with FreeSWITCH rev. 17118. The problem appears to be that I haven't been able to get my FreeSWITCH to offer SILK as one of its codecs. mod_silk is loaded. I am using the PortAudio interface to make the call; the other

Re: [notmuch] Bulk message tagging

2010-04-03 Thread Jason White
Xavier Maillard x...@gnu.org wrote: Is there an easy way to mark a whole bunch of message (restricted in a region, result of a search, ...) ? notmuch tag +tag|-tag [...] [--] search-terms [...] does this from the shell. If you want to do it from one of the user interfaces, it depends on which