Re: bug#50460: 27.1; defcustom for mail-user-agent is too strict?

2021-09-08 Thread Lars Ingebrigtsen
David Bremner writes: > The defcustom for mail-user-agent looks like > > :type '(radio (function-item :tag "Message package" > :format "%t\n" > message-user-agent) > ;; [...] snip >

Re: bug#49380: 27.1; is mm-inline-message supported outside Gnus?

2021-07-06 Thread Lars Ingebrigtsen
David Bremner writes: > That makes sense to me, with the (perhaps obvious) caveat that calling > without binding the setup function should cleanly do the display > (perhaps with less fontification) and return. Yup. I've now done the refactoring, so there should be no user-visible changes for

Re: bug#49380: 27.1; is mm-inline-message supported outside Gnus?

2021-07-05 Thread Lars Ingebrigtsen
David Bremner writes: > I should have been more precise. I'm calling it indirectly via > mm-display-part, which is useful in the case where someone attaches a > message/rfc822 part to their message. In principle notmuch can (and in > the general case does) render the part directly, but in

Re: bug#49380: 27.1; is mm-inline-message supported outside Gnus?

2021-07-04 Thread Lars Ingebrigtsen
David Bremner writes: > notmuch-show-mode relies on various mm-* functions to display message > parts. This is problematic for "message/rfc822" parts, since > mm-inline-message ends up calling (gnus-article-prepare-display) which > resets the buffer major-mode to gnus-article-mode since >

Re: bug#23747: bug present without emacs25 or notmuch

2019-09-23 Thread Lars Ingebrigtsen
David Bremner writes: > David Bremner writes: > >> I have managed to duplicate (I think) this bug without notmuch or emacs >> 25. >> >> In emacs 24.5.1 (on debian) >> >> (require 'mml2015) >> (setq mml2015-sign-with-sender t) >> >> M-x toggle-debug-on-error >> >> M-x message-mail >> (fill in

Re: bug#35370: notmuch-emacs: avoiding deprecated message-default-charset

2019-05-10 Thread Lars Ingebrigtsen
Eli Zaretskii writes: > I think so, but I'd be happier if someone from the Gnus folks could > eyeball this patch. > > Lars, any comments/objections? I think the patch looks OK -- it'll change the behaviour if you have set enable-multibyte-characters to nil, but... does anybody do that? --