[notmuch] [PATCH (rebased)] Handle message renames in mail spool

2009-12-16 Thread Michael Alan Dorman
> I'd had much better luck matching List-Id than matching addresses in > recent years. YMMV. As long as you're not CC:d, you're fine. If you're CC:'d, well, Mailman is more brain-dead than you could imagine. Mike.

Re: [notmuch] [PATCH (rebased)] Handle message renames in mail spool

2009-12-16 Thread Michael Alan Dorman
I'd had much better luck matching List-Id than matching addresses in recent years. YMMV. As long as you're not CC:d, you're fine. If you're CC:'d, well, Mailman is more brain-dead than you could imagine. Mike. ___ notmuch mailing list

[notmuch] [PATCH (rebased)] Handle message renames in mail spool

2009-12-04 Thread Michael Alan Dorman
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 00:55:20 +0600 Mikhail Gusarov wrote: > > Twas brillig at 13:52:20 04.12.2009 UTC-05 when > mdorman at ironicdesign.com did gyre and gimble: > > MAD> Err, this makes no sense. How can Mailman have any knowledge > MAD> of, and therefore "do anything" to any message that

[notmuch] [PATCH (rebased)] Handle message renames in mail spool

2009-12-04 Thread Michael Alan Dorman
> But the above sounds like the List-Id header is unreliable enough to > be useless. In my current .sieve setup, I have 93 entries for mailing lists. 87 of them use list-id[1]. 3 use list-post. 1 uses 'mailing-list', but looking at it, could be switched to list-id. 2 use x-mailing-list

[notmuch] [PATCH (rebased)] Handle message renames in mail spool

2009-12-04 Thread Michael Alan Dorman
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 00:07:36 +0600 Mikhail Gusarov wrote: > The only problem with Cc is that Mailman suppresses duplicate > messages and hence there is no List-Id: on message. Err, this makes no sense. How can Mailman have any knowledge of, and therefore "do anything" to any message that came

Re: [notmuch] [PATCH (rebased)] Handle message renames in mail spool

2009-12-04 Thread Michael Alan Dorman
But the above sounds like the List-Id header is unreliable enough to be useless. In my current .sieve setup, I have 93 entries for mailing lists. 87 of them use list-id[1]. 3 use list-post. 1 uses 'mailing-list', but looking at it, could be switched to list-id. 2 use x-mailing-list (blasted