[notmuch] [PATCH] test-lib.sh: Add explicit license detail, with change from GPLv2 to GPLv2+.

Hi, On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > FWIW, I only said "_at least_ you need consent from them", and it was not > meant to be an exhaustive list. ?"blame -C -C -C" may tell you more. Without substantial analysis, "blame" alone is not sufficient - it does not show which

Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] test-lib.sh: Add explicit license detail, with change from GPLv2 to GPLv2+.

Hi, On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote: FWIW, I only said _at least_ you need consent from them, and it was not meant to be an exhaustive list.  blame -C -C -C may tell you more. Without substantial analysis, blame alone is not sufficient - it does not

[notmuch] [PATCH] test-lib.sh: Add explicit license detail, with change from GPLv2 to GPLv2+.

Hi, On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 3:55 AM, Carl Worth wrote: > The request for relicensing was presented to the git community in: > > ? ? ? ?Message-ID: <871vgmki4f.fsf at steelpick.localdomain> > > and explicitly agreed to by Junio C Hamano, Sverre Rabbelier, Johannes > Schindelin, Pierre Habouzit,