Bye !

Hi, After several months of notmuch usage, I feel like it is not really adapted to me or I do not want to adapt. I am going back to my first and beloved simplistic rmail. I just wanted to congratulate all of you for your really appreciated awesome work. Thank you very much and keep up the good

Bye !

Hi, After several months of notmuch usage, I feel like it is not really adapted to me or I do not want to adapt. I am going back to my first and beloved simplistic rmail. I just wanted to congratulate all of you for your really appreciated awesome work. Thank you very much and keep up the good

A big thank you for the major tagging speedup

On Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:36:24 +0100, Florian Friesdorf wrote: > > I just wanted to express my gratitude, that for a while now notmuch is > tagging by a factor 200 faster than it used to be! +1 It is really comfortable to notmuch tag now ! /Xavier

Re: A big thank you for the major tagging speedup

On Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:36:24 +0100, Florian Friesdorf f...@chaoflow.net wrote: I just wanted to express my gratitude, that for a while now notmuch is tagging by a factor 200 faster than it used to be! +1 It is really comfortable to notmuch tag now ! /Xavier

Re: [PATCH 08/10] test: set variables using `let' instead of `setq' in Emacs tests

On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 08:45:09 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote: Using `setq' for setting variables in Emacs tests affect other tests that may run in the same Emacs environment. Currently it works because each test is run in a separate Emacs instance. But in the future

Re: [PATCH 10/10] test: use emacsclient(1) for Emacs tests

On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 08:45:11 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote: Before the change, every Emacs test ran in a separate Emacs instance. Starting Emacs many times wastes considerable time and it gets worse as the test suite grows. The patch solves this by using a single

Re: [PATCH 6/6] emacs: modify the default show-mode key bindings for archiving

This is also +1 for me. /Xavier ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch

[PATCH 6/6] emacs: modify the default show-mode key bindings for archiving

This is also +1 for me. /Xavier

[PATCH 10/10] test: use emacsclient(1) for Emacs tests

On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 08:45:11 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote: > Before the change, every Emacs test ran in a separate Emacs > instance. Starting Emacs many times wastes considerable time and > it gets worse as the test suite grows. The patch solves this by > using a single Emacs server and

[PATCH 08/10] test: set variables using `let' instead of `setq' in Emacs tests

On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 08:45:09 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote: > Using `setq' for setting variables in Emacs tests affect other > tests that may run in the same Emacs environment. Currently it > works because each test is run in a separate Emacs instance. But > in the future multiple tests will

[PATCH 3/4] config: only set search.exclude_tags to "deleted; spam; " during setup

On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 20:19:03 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote: > If the 'search.exclude_tags' option is missing from the config file, > its value is automatically set to "deleted;spam;". Taking PoLS/DWIM > into account, this should probably only happen during setup. > > This patch is actually Austin

[PATCH v3 2/2] search: Support automatic tag exclusions

Hey Pieter, On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 20:19:00 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote: > Nice feature! I won't be using it myself, but I can imagine it being > *very* useful for those who still feel the need to "delete" email :). Adding a 'deleted' tag does not mean there will be a delete/purge process ;)

[PATCH] .dir-locals.el: changed one-char comment prefix '; ' to two; '; ; '

On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 10:35:47 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote: > Like in emacs/*.el two comment chars (;;) is required so that > (indent-region) doesn't break indentation. > --- > .dir-locals.el |6 +++--- +1 /Xavier

Re: [PATCH] .dir-locals.el: changed one-char comment prefix '; ' to two; '; ; '

On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 10:35:47 +0200, Tomi Ollila tomi.oll...@iki.fi wrote: Like in emacs/*.el two comment chars (;;) is required so that (indent-region) doesn't break indentation. --- .dir-locals.el |6 +++--- +1 /Xavier ___ notmuch mailing list

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] search: Support automatic tag exclusions

Hey Pieter, On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 20:19:00 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote: Nice feature! I won't be using it myself, but I can imagine it being *very* useful for those who still feel the need to delete email :). Adding a 'deleted' tag does not mean there will be a delete/purge

Re: [PATCH 3/4] config: only set search.exclude_tags to deleted; spam; during setup

On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 20:19:03 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote: If the 'search.exclude_tags' option is missing from the config file, its value is automatically set to deleted;spam;. Taking PoLS/DWIM into account, this should probably only happen during setup. This patch is

[PATCH] emacs/*.el: changed one-char comment prefix '; ' to two; '; ; '

On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 16:44:28 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote: > In order for emacs (indent-region) to (re)indent emacs lisp > properly there needs to be at least 2 comment characters (;;). > --- > > resubmitted as the old patch does not apply cleanly anymore. > > emacs/notmuch-hello.el |4 +- >

Re: [PATCH] emacs/*.el: changed one-char comment prefix '; ' to two; '; ; '

On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 16:44:28 +0200, Tomi Ollila tomi.oll...@iki.fi wrote: In order for emacs (indent-region) to (re)indent emacs lisp properly there needs to be at least 2 comment characters (;;). --- resubmitted as the old patch does not apply cleanly anymore. emacs/notmuch-hello.el |

tach.el: an attachment interface for message mode.

On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:04:49 -0500, Jesse Rosenthal wrote: [ ... ] > Thus: tach.el. Tach is a minor mode that adds mutt-like attachment > handling to message mode. It's not notmuch specific, but I wrote it to > use with notmuch, and I thought it might be of use to some on the > list. I like

Re: tach.el: an attachment interface for message mode.

On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:04:49 -0500, Jesse Rosenthal jrosent...@jhu.edu wrote: [ ... ] Thus: tach.el. Tach is a minor mode that adds mutt-like attachment handling to message mode. It's not notmuch specific, but I wrote it to use with notmuch, and I thought it might be of use to some on the

Sort by newest first from notmuch-hello ?

Hi, I am running latest release (0.11). I have set notmuch-search-oldest-first to t. When doing M-x notmuch-search, messages order does not respect this setting -i.e newest com firts -. On the other hand, from notmuch-hello I get expected behaviour. How can this be more "consistent" ? By the

Sort by newest first from notmuch-hello ?

Hi, I am running latest release (0.11). I have set notmuch-search-oldest-first to t. When doing M-x notmuch-search, messages order does not respect this setting -i.e newest com firts -. On the other hand, from notmuch-hello I get expected behaviour. How can this be more consistent ? By the way,

on deleting messages

Hi, On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:01:45 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: [ ... ] > Based on the show-mode improvements I recently sent [1], the following > patch set implements thread and message delete keys. > > This is the last I'm going to comment on this issue. If we don't want > to support

Re: on deleting messages

Hi, On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 11:01:45 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: [ ... ] Based on the show-mode improvements I recently sent [1], the following patch set implements thread and message delete keys. This is the last I'm going to comment on this issue. If we

[PATCH 2/2] notmuch-dev: Update the master branch when requested.

On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 09:07:52 +, David Edmondson wrote: > On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 22:03:17 +0100, Xavier Maillard > wrote: > > Have you planned to cook something about this in notmuch wiki ? > > That sounds like something I could use to test patches more easily than > > I

[PATCH v2] Document external dependencies in the test suite

Hi, On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:52:47 -0500, Ethan Glasser-Camp wrote: [...] > +Prerequisites > +- > +Some tests require external dependencies to run. Without them, they > +will be skipped, or (rarely) marked failed. Please install these, so > +that you know if you break anything. > +

Re: [PATCH v2] Document external dependencies in the test suite

Hi, On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:52:47 -0500, Ethan Glasser-Camp gla...@cs.rpi.edu wrote: [...] +Prerequisites +- +Some tests require external dependencies to run. Without them, they +will be skipped, or (rarely) marked failed. Please install these, so +that you know if you break

Re: [PATCH 2/2] notmuch-dev: Update the master branch when requested.

On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 09:07:52 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote: On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 22:03:17 +0100, Xavier Maillard xav...@maillard.im wrote: Have you planned to cook something about this in notmuch wiki ? That sounds like something I could use to test patches more easily than I

[PATCH] Set fill column to 70 in .dir-locals.el and refactor other settings.

On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 17:54:51 -0500, Austin Clements wrote: > Quoth Xavier Maillard on Jan 13 at 11:42 pm: > > > > This controls where comments and other text wraps. 70 is the default > > value, so this simply returns it to the default for people who have > > overri

notmuch release 0.11 now available

Hi, congratulations to all of the notmuch contributors. Keep up the effort /Xavier

[PATCH] Set fill column to 70 in .dir-locals.el and refactor other settings.

This controls where comments and other text wraps. 70 is the default value, so this simply returns it to the default for people who have overridden it. Most notmuch code already adheres to this. --- SO here is the patch (still sorry if I did it wrongly and very badly). .dir-locals.el | 19

[PATCH] Set fill column to 70 in .dir-locals.el.

Sorry if it is not correct to act like this (did I ever tell how n00b I am when it comes to git ?). So I wanted to /amend/ your patch to add some refactoring to it. I hope this will not hurt :/ /Xavier

[PATCH] emacs: whitespace-cleanup for emacs/*.el files

On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 11:50:52 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote: > On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 08:22:49 +, David Edmondson wrote: > > On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 23:07:03 +0100, Xavier Maillard > > wrote: > > > On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:13:35 +0200, Tomi Ollila > > > wrote: &

[PATCH 2/2] notmuch-dev: Update the master branch when requested.

Hi David, Have you planned to cook something about this in notmuch wiki ? That sounds like something I could use to test patches more easily than I do currently. Note: I am totally a dummy when I have to use git :/ Regards /Xavier

[PATCH] emacs: globally replace non-branching "(if (not ..." with "(unless ..."

On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 08:23:55 +, David Edmondson wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:33:06 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote: > > Less code, same results, without sacrificing readability. > > +1, but why not replace non-branching `if' with `when' as well? I tend to use WHEN for case I need to execute

[PATCH] Set fill column to 70 in .dir-locals.el.

On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:17:23 -0500, Austin Clements wrote: > This controls where comments and other text wraps. 70 is the default > value, so this simply returns it to the default for people who have > overridden it. Most notmuch code already adheres to this. +1 /Xavier

Re: [PATCH] Set fill column to 70 in .dir-locals.el.

On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:17:23 -0500, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote: This controls where comments and other text wraps. 70 is the default value, so this simply returns it to the default for people who have overridden it. Most notmuch code already adheres to this. +1 /Xavier

Re: [PATCH] emacs: globally replace non-branching (if (not ... with (unless ...

On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 08:23:55 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote: On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:33:06 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote: Less code, same results, without sacrificing readability. +1, but why not replace non-branching `if' with `when' as well? I tend to use WHEN for

Re: [PATCH] emacs: whitespace-cleanup for emacs/*.el files

On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 11:50:52 +0200, Tomi Ollila tomi.oll...@iki.fi wrote: On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 08:22:49 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote: On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 23:07:03 +0100, Xavier Maillard xav...@maillard.im wrote: On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:13:35 +0200, Tomi Ollila tomi.oll

Re: [PATCH] Set fill column to 70 in .dir-locals.el.

Sorry if it is not correct to act like this (did I ever tell how n00b I am when it comes to git ?). So I wanted to /amend/ your patch to add some refactoring to it. I hope this will not hurt :/ /Xavier ___ notmuch mailing list

[PATCH] Set fill column to 70 in .dir-locals.el and refactor other settings.

This controls where comments and other text wraps. 70 is the default value, so this simply returns it to the default for people who have overridden it. Most notmuch code already adheres to this. --- SO here is the patch (still sorry if I did it wrongly and very badly). .dir-locals.el | 19

0.11 is frozen, please update NEWS

Hi, Maybe it is inappropriate, but do you have any idea when you plan to release the so-expected 0.11 release ? Anyway, keep up the good job guys ! /Xavier

[PATCH] emacs: globally replace non-branching "(if (not ..." with "(unless ..."

On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:33:06 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote: > Less code, same results, without sacrificing readability. +1 /Xavier

[PATCH] emacs: whitespace-cleanup for emacs/*.el files

On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:13:35 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote: > Executed > for f in emacs/*.el > do emacs -q --batch --eval \ > "(progn (find-file \"$f\") (whitespace-cleanup) (save-buffer))" > done > > which > removed trailing whitespace and empty lines at the end of file >

[PATCH] emacs: Improve `notmuch-hello' display on ttys.

On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 10:15:28 +, David Edmondson wrote: > Inserting spaces to pad out columns is good, except when the padding > makes the line wider than the window. This looks particularly bad on a > tty where there is no fringe. > > Hence, avoid padding the last column on each row. Works

Re: [PATCH] emacs: Improve `notmuch-hello' display on ttys.

On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 10:15:28 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote: Inserting spaces to pad out columns is good, except when the padding makes the line wider than the window. This looks particularly bad on a tty where there is no fringe. Hence, avoid padding the last column on each row.

Re: [PATCH] man: add missing SEE ALSO header to notmuch reply man page

On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 22:57:22 +0200, Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org wrote: Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org --- man/man1/notmuch-reply.1 |3 +++ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) +1 /Xavier ___ notmuch mailing list

[PATCH] man: add missing SEE ALSO header to notmuch reply man page

On Sun, 8 Jan 2012 22:57:22 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula > --- > man/man1/notmuch-reply.1 |3 +++ > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) +1 /Xavier

[PATCH] emacs: Mark the quoted region during reply.

On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 10:03:40 +, David Edmondson wrote: > Mark the quoted region of text during a reply, making it easy for the > user to delete it quickly. LGTM ! (That's also a desirable feature). /Xavier

[PATCH 2/2] update NEWS

Hi, sorry to bother with such a simple correction On Mon, 2 Jan 2012 14:16:51 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > +Don't sort messages when creating a dump file > + > + This speads up tag dumps considerably, without any loss of ^^ speeds /Xavier

Python bindings for adoption

On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 17:14:58 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > As I have repeatedly stated that I want to hand over the maintainership > of the notmuch python bindings, and I would like to do it asap. I feel > that people like Patrick Totzke, or Justus Winter who generally have > been working on

[ANNOUNCE] mutt with notmuch support

On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 13:39:38 +0100, Karel Zak wrote: > > This is not another curses front-end for notmuch, this is mutt :-) > > I have forked mutt to seriously integrate notmuch to this excellent e-mail > client. I don't want to use symlinks or any other hacks to emulate virtual > folders. My

Re: [PATCH 1/4] emacs: unify search mechanisms

On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 15:23:17 +0200, Tomi Ollila tomi.oll...@nixu.com wrote: On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 14:42:47 +0200, Jani Nikula j...@nikula.org wrote: On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 10:43:37 -0400, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote: Personally I would like to be able to customize the hello screen to

Re: [ANNOUNCE] mutt with notmuch support

On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 13:39:38 +0100, Karel Zak k...@redhat.com wrote: This is not another curses front-end for notmuch, this is mutt :-) I have forked mutt to seriously integrate notmuch to this excellent e-mail client. I don't want to use symlinks or any other hacks to emulate virtual

Re: Python bindings for adoption

On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 17:14:58 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de wrote: As I have repeatedly stated that I want to hand over the maintainership of the notmuch python bindings, and I would like to do it asap. I feel that people like Patrick Totzke, or Justus Winter who generally have

Re: [PATCH 2/2] update NEWS

Hi, sorry to bother with such a simple correction On Mon, 2 Jan 2012 14:16:51 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: +Don't sort messages when creating a dump file + + This speads up tag dumps considerably, without any loss of ^^ speeds

[PATCH 1/4] emacs: unify search mechanisms

On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 15:23:17 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote: > On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 14:42:47 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > > On Fri, 30 Dec 2011 10:43:37 -0400, David Bremner > > wrote: > > > > > Personally I would like to be able to customize the hello screen to > > > remove the search box. I find it

Tagging strategy and latest notmuch

Hi, my mail workflow is pretty /basic/ and /raw/. Here it is: 1a. notmuch new (for consistency sake) 1b. notmuchsync syncs from notmuch tags to my maildir flags (actually, it is to prune is:delete tagged messages) 2. offlineimap syncs with my imap server 3. notmuch new incorporate new messages

[PATCH] emacs: Don't attempt to colour tags in `notmuch-show-mode'.

On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 12:09:40 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 13:42:28 +0100, Xavier Maillard > wrote: > > On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 22:29:57 -0500, Austin Clements > > wrote: > > > LGTM. > > > > uh, what ? > > http://www.google.com/search?q=LGTM LGTM too no :D /Xavier

[PATCH] emacs: Don't attempt to colour tags in `notmuch-show-mode'.

Hi David, On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 16:47:14 +, David Edmondson wrote: > The tags were coloured using text properties. Unfortunately that text > (the header line) also has an overlay, which overrides the text > properties. There's not point in applying text properties that will > never be seen.

[PATCH] emacs: Don't attempt to colour tags in `notmuch-show-mode'.

On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 22:29:57 -0500, Austin Clements wrote: > LGTM. uh, what ? /Xavier

[PATCH] Ignore encrypted parts when indexing.

Hi Jameson, On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 09:11:41 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > It appears to be an oversight that encrypted parts were indexed > previously. The terms generated from encrypted parts are meaningless > and do nothing but add bloat to the database. It is not worth > indexing the

Re: [PATCH] Ignore encrypted parts when indexing.

Hi Jameson, On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 09:11:41 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: It appears to be an oversight that encrypted parts were indexed previously. The terms generated from encrypted parts are meaningless and do nothing but add bloat to the database. It is

Re: [PATCH] emacs: Don't attempt to colour tags in `notmuch-show-mode'.

On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 12:09:40 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 13:42:28 +0100, Xavier Maillard xav...@maillard.im wrote: On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 22:29:57 -0500, Austin Clements amdra...@mit.edu wrote: LGTM. uh, what ? http

Tagging strategy and latest notmuch

Hi, my mail workflow is pretty /basic/ and /raw/. Here it is: 1a. notmuch new (for consistency sake) 1b. notmuchsync syncs from notmuch tags to my maildir flags (actually, it is to prune is:delete tagged messages) 2. offlineimap syncs with my imap server 3. notmuch new incorporate new messages

list of notmuch frontend

On Tue, 27 Dec 2011 21:29:33 +0100, Antoine Amarilli wrote: > > Out of curiosity, how can people contribute to the "wiki" ? I do not see > > any 'Edit this page' button. > > It's a git repository which you can clone, edit and push back. See > (linked at

list of notmuch frontend

On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 22:12:52 +0100, Antoine Amarilli wrote: > On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 06:10:13PM +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote: > > On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 15:34:23 +0100, Olivier Schwander > chadok.info> wrote: > > > Is there a somewhere a list of the various notmuch frontend ? It would > > > be very

Re: list of notmuch frontend

On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 22:12:52 +0100, Antoine Amarilli a...@a3nm.net wrote: On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 06:10:13PM +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote: On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 15:34:23 +0100, Olivier Schwander olivier.schwan...@chadok.info wrote: Is there a somewhere a list of the various notmuch frontend ?

[PATCH v2] emacs: call notmuch-show instead of notmuch-search in buttonised id: links

Hi David, On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 07:48:49 +, David Edmondson wrote: > On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 20:59:12 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins finestructure.net> wrote: > > Since message-ids necessarily match just a single message, there's no > > reason to do a search for the id before viewing the actual

[PATCH] emacs: call notmuch-show instead notmuch-search in buttonised id: links

Hi Jameson, On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 20:55:48 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > Since message-ids necessarily match just a single message, there's no > reason to do a search for the id before viewing the actual message; > the search just becomes an extra screen to click through. Clicking on > an

Re: [PATCH] emacs: call notmuch-show instead notmuch-search in buttonised id: links

Hi Jameson, On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 20:55:48 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: Since message-ids necessarily match just a single message, there's no reason to do a search for the id before viewing the actual message; the search just becomes an extra screen to click

Re: [PATCH v2] emacs: call notmuch-show instead of notmuch-search in buttonised id: links

Hi David, On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 07:48:49 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote: On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 20:59:12 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: Since message-ids necessarily match just a single message, there's no reason to do a search for the id before

[RFC][PATCH v2] emacs: Re-implement advance/rewind functions of notmuch-show-mode.

On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 09:29:55 -0500, Aaron Ecay wrote: > Would the problem you had with previous-s-c-prop-change be fixed by the > patch to the original function I sent in the thread starting at > id:"m2y5u5cykp.fsf at kcals.intra.maillard.im" ? AFAIK it does. /Xavier

[PATCH] emacs: fix off-by-one bug in notmuch-show-archive

Hey Aaron, On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 09:24:20 -0500, Aaron Ecay wrote: > Text properties change between characters; prev-s-c-property-change > returns the position after the change. Thus, it is still inside the > invisible region. This patch works for me (at least on all the messages I tested it

Filter one-post thread only ?

Hi, In order to clean up and to trash out as many posts as possible in several mailing lists I did not check lately, I am trying to find a way to limit the current display to messages matching this requirements: 1. post older than 1 month 2. one-message thread only (a post and no

[BUG?] Pressing SPACEbar is not doing what's expected.

Hi Jamie, On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:19:24 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 00:08:38 +0100, Xavier Maillard wrote: > > What happens here is just what is described in paragraph 2. Although I > > am in situation described in first paragraph, pressing S

[BUG?] Pressing SPACEbar is not doing what's expected.

Hi, I recently upgraded my notmuch installation here (passing from 0.6 or such to latest 0.10.x series). Problem is now, pressing SPACE in a notmuch-show buffer no longer scroll in the message as it used to do. SPC is bound to run command notmuch-show-advance-and-archive and its docstring says:

Filter one-post thread only ?

Hi, In order to clean up and to trash out as many posts as possible in several mailing lists I did not check lately, I am trying to find a way to limit the current display to messages matching this requirements: 1. post older than 1 month 2. one-message thread only (a post and no

Re: [PATCH] emacs: fix off-by-one bug in notmuch-show-archive

Hey Aaron, On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 09:24:20 -0500, Aaron Ecay aarone...@gmail.com wrote: Text properties change between characters; prev-s-c-property-change returns the position after the change. Thus, it is still inside the invisible region. This patch works for me (at least on all the messages

[BUG?] Pressing SPACEbar is not doing what's expected.

Hi, I recently upgraded my notmuch installation here (passing from 0.6 or such to latest 0.10.x series). Problem is now, pressing SPACE in a notmuch-show buffer no longer scroll in the message as it used to do. SPC is bound to run command notmuch-show-advance-and-archive and its docstring says:

Re: [BUG?] Pressing SPACEbar is not doing what's expected.

Hi Jamie, On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:19:24 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 00:08:38 +0100, Xavier Maillard x...@gnu.org wrote: What happens here is just what is described in paragraph 2. Although I am in situation described in first paragraph

RFC/PATCH emacs attachment handling

Hello Tomi, On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 10:06:36 +0300, Tomi Ollila wrote: > On Wed 07 Sep 2011 04:20, Mark Walters writes: > > > Hello > > > > I have modified the emacs interface for handling attachments by adding > > a keymap to the attachment button. For example pressing v when on an > > attachment

SlackBuild package for notmuch 0.7

Hi, On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 19:15:56 +0200, Jostein Berntsen wrote: > > I have made a SlackBuild package for notmuch version 0.7 that makes it > easy to install it the correct way in Slackware 13.37: Thank you very much Jostein ! -- X=M=A

Re: SlackBuild package for notmuch 0.7

Hi, On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 19:15:56 +0200, Jostein Berntsen jber...@broadpark.no wrote: I have made a SlackBuild package for notmuch version 0.7 that makes it easy to install it the correct way in Slackware 13.37: Thank you very much Jostein ! -- X=M=A

Re: RFC/PATCH emacs attachment handling

Hello Tomi, On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 10:06:36 +0300, Tomi Ollila tomi.oll...@iki.fi wrote: On Wed 07 Sep 2011 04:20, Mark Walters markwalters1...@gmail.com writes: Hello I have modified the emacs interface for handling attachments by adding a keymap to the attachment button. For example

[PATCH 2/2] add edit function to resume postponed emails

On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 14:58:22 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 23:32:58 +0200, Xavier Maillard > wrote: > > Maybe I misunderstood original goal but what I had in mind reading this > > is certainly not editing a priviously received message in ord

[PATCH 2/2] add edit function to resume postponed emails

Hi Jameson, On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:40:44 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 17:36:43 -0400, Antoine Beaupr? > wrote: > > I think this is a great idea. Unfortunately, I had a lot of trouble > > making message-mode digest an existing buffer. For example, if you take > >

Re: [PATCH 2/2] add edit function to resume postponed emails

On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 14:58:22 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 23:32:58 +0200, Xavier Maillard xav...@maillard.im wrote: Maybe I misunderstood original goal but what I had in mind reading this is certainly not editing a priviously received

Re: [PATCH 2/2] add edit function to resume postponed emails

Hi Jameson, On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:40:44 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 17:36:43 -0400, Antoine Beaupré anar...@koumbit.org wrote: I think this is a great idea. Unfortunately, I had a lot of trouble making message-mode digest an existing

[PATCH] fix sum moar typos

Hi Pieter, On Sat, 4 Jun 2011 17:54:12 +0200, Pieter Praet wrote: > Because they cause global warming. > > Signed-off-by: Pieter Praet > --- > > TL;DR: Various typo fixes. Applies to jrollins/release-candidate/0.6 > (2baf08f5) > > Due to the impending 0.6 release, I've gone off on an

[PATCH] Added C-up and C-down to cycle through previous searches

Hi, On Sun, 29 May 2011 20:04:00 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote: > Hi Dima. > > On Sun, 29 May 2011 01:56:28 -0700, notmuch at dima.secretsauce.net wrote: > > From: Dima Kogan > > > > --- > > > > Hi. > > > > I made a few improvements to the emacs UI. This patch allows the user to > >

Re: [PATCH] Added C-up and C-down to cycle through previous searches

Hi, On Sun, 29 May 2011 20:04:00 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Dima. On Sun, 29 May 2011 01:56:28 -0700, notm...@dima.secretsauce.net wrote: From: Dima Kogan d...@secretsauce.net --- Hi. I made a few improvements to the emacs UI. This patch

Re: [PATCH] fix sum moar typos

Hi Pieter, On Sat, 4 Jun 2011 17:54:12 +0200, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote: Because they cause global warming. Signed-off-by: Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org --- TL;DR: Various typo fixes. Applies to jrollins/release-candidate/0.6 (2baf08f5) Due to the impending 0.6 release,

When will we have our next release?

Hi, On Sat, 04 Jun 2011 10:21:00 -0300, David Bremner wrote: > Overall I think Carl's time based release proposal is a reasonable > plan. I think one problem we've been having is that we seem to have lost > track of > > # Releases of notmuch have a two-digit version (0.1, 0.2, etc.). We >

When will we have our next release?

Hi Carl, On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 15:56:42 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 14:39:13 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins finestructure.net> wrote: > > Can we set a target date for 0.6 release? So we'll all start feeling > > really bad if we miss it? > > Frankly, I wouldn't mind doing strict

Re: When will we have our next release?

Hi Carl, On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 15:56:42 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 14:39:13 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: Can we set a target date for 0.6 release? So we'll all start feeling really bad if we miss it? Frankly, I

Re: When will we have our next release?

Hi, On Sat, 04 Jun 2011 10:21:00 -0300, David Bremner brem...@unb.ca wrote: Overall I think Carl's time based release proposal is a reasonable plan. I think one problem we've been having is that we seem to have lost track of # Releases of notmuch have a two-digit version (0.1, 0.2,

[RFC] Several minor enhancements to the Emacs interface

Hi Thomas, On Tue, 31 May 2011 16:47:27 +0200, Thomas Jost wrote: > Hi list, > > The thread regarding multiple sender identities seems to have been of > interest for several people, so I'd like to share a few other snippets > From my Emacs configuration file. > > Please tell me what you think

Re: [RFC] Several minor enhancements to the Emacs interface

Hi Thomas, On Tue, 31 May 2011 16:47:27 +0200, Thomas Jost schno...@schnouki.net wrote: Hi list, The thread regarding multiple sender identities seems to have been of interest for several people, so I'd like to share a few other snippets From my Emacs configuration file. Please tell me

Header and other questions

Hi, On Mon, 16 May 2011 09:29:19 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > On Mon, 16 May 2011 11:27:52 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal > wrote: > > The decision, if I remember correctly, was that regions are so intuitive > > for emacs users, and many people reported trying to tag by region > > without

  1   2   3   >