On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 09:19:51 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 23:48:30 -0500, Antoine Beaupr? anarcat.ath.cx> wrote:
> > Jumping in here, I have modified the previously posted code here to
> > provide me with a more complete solution.
>
> This looks good. I'll switch over to
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 09:19:51 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 23:48:30 -0500, Antoine Beaupré anar...@anarcat.ath.cx
wrote:
Jumping in here, I have modified the previously posted code here to
provide me with a more complete solution.
This looks good. I'll
On Fri, 06 May 2011 12:46:34 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
>
> I might try to add a couple of more things before declaring the
> candidate release-ready, but this is more-or-less it. Please start
> using this branch "in production" as much as possible, so that we can
> build up a chorus of
On Fri, 06 May 2011 12:46:34 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
I might try to add a couple of more things before declaring the
candidate release-ready, but this is more-or-less it. Please start
using this branch in production as much as possible, so that we can
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 00:28:30 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
> > I have one question, how do you add multiple query arguments? For
> > example, in my org file I tried 'notmuch-search:tag:notmuch' - this
> > worked great, but if I did 'notmuch-search:tag:notmuch and subject:Org'
> > the link only
Hi Matthieu!
On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 22:22:17 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre wrote:
> I have written the org-mode support for notmuch a while ago. It allows
> to open links to notmuch from org-mode and create org-mode link from
> notmuch buffers.
>
> The current maintainer of the package is looking for
Hi Matthieu!
On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 22:22:17 +0100, Matthieu Lemerre ra...@free.fr wrote:
I have written the org-mode support for notmuch a while ago. It allows
to open links to notmuch from org-mode and create org-mode link from
notmuch buffers.
The current maintainer of the package is
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 14:52:01 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 02/03/2011 11:25 AM, micah anderson wrote:
> > 1. I personally think notmuch-show-process-pgpmime should default to
> > true
>
> note that with it set to false, you can still M-RET (instead of RET) on
>
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 14:52:01 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
d...@fifthhorseman.net wrote:
On 02/03/2011 11:25 AM, micah anderson wrote:
1. I personally think notmuch-show-process-pgpmime should default to
true
note that with it set to false, you can still M-RET (instead of RET) on
an item
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 12:35:16 -0800, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 13:40:25 -0500, micah anderson
> wrote:
> > Due to my harddisk in my laptop being slow (5400RPM), my notmuch
> > database growing, and perhaps some fragmentation somewhere, this has
> > beco
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:18:45 -0800, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> Hi, all. I have pushed a new branch called "crypto" to my notmuch
> repository [0]. This branch provides full support for PGP/MIME signed
> and encrypted messages, including emacs UI support. It has been applied
> on top of cworth's
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 12:35:16 -0800, Jameson Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 13:40:25 -0500, micah anderson mi...@riseup.net wrote:
Due to my harddisk in my laptop being slow (5400RPM), my notmuch
database growing, and perhaps some fragmentation somewhere
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 19:20:00 +0100, Thomas Schwinge
wrote:
> Stepping away from the current code base -- what is notmuch's original
> idea of concurrency? That is, all of us probably know that one:
>
> A Xapian exception occurred opening database: Unable to get write
> lock on
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 19:20:00 +0100, Thomas Schwinge tho...@schwinge.name
wrote:
Stepping away from the current code base -- what is notmuch's original
idea of concurrency? That is, all of us probably know that one:
A Xapian exception occurred opening database: Unable to get write
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 10:42:31 -0700, Dirk Hohndel
wrote:
> +Provide 'G' key binding to trigger mail refresh
> +
> + The 'G' key works wherever '=' works. Before refreshing the screen
> + it calls an external program that can be used to poll email servers,
> + run notmuch new and setup
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 10:42:31 -0700, Dirk Hohndel hohn...@infradead.org wrote:
+Provide 'G' key binding to trigger mail refresh
+
+ The 'G' key works wherever '=' works. Before refreshing the screen
+ it calls an external program that can be used to poll email servers,
+ run notmuch new
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 22:06:39 +0200, Xavier Maillard
wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 10:34:53 +0200, Peter Wiersig london087.server4you.de> wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:27:17 -0400, Jameson Rollins > finestructure.net> wrote:
> > > Does anyone know how to "bounce" a message,
> >
> > pipe the
This patch was originally sent by Andreas Kl?ckner in:
id:200912141421.52561.lists at informa.tiker.net. It was then
subsequently updated by Michal Sojka in:
id:1264692317-9175-2-git-send-email-sojkam1 at fel.cvut.cz and then
further improved again by Michal Sojka in:
This patch was originally sent by Andreas Klöckner in:
id:200912141421.52561.li...@informa.tiker.net. It was then
subsequently updated by Michal Sojka in:
id:1264692317-9175-2-git-send-email-sojk...@fel.cvut.cz and then
further improved again by Michal Sojka in:
On 2010-04-08, micah anderson wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 15:12:44 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> > For the upcoming 0.2 release, here are some things that I would like to
> > have in place:
> >
> > * Changes to indexing, (addition of body:, folder:, list:, etc.). This
On 2010-04-08, micah anderson wrote:
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 15:12:44 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
For the upcoming 0.2 release, here are some things that I would like to
have in place:
* Changes to indexing, (addition of body:, folder:, list:, etc.). This
is stuff
On 2010-03-27, micah anderson wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:50:52 -0400, micah anderson
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:57:00 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth" > SSpaeth.de> wrote:
> >
> > > From git repository git://github.com/spaetz/notmuch-all
On 2010-03-27, micah anderson wrote:
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:50:52 -0400, micah anderson mi...@riseup.net wrote:
On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:57:00 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth
sebast...@sspaeth.de wrote:
From git repository git://github.com/spaetz/notmuch-all-feature.git I
would like
On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:57:00 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth" wrote:
> From git repository git://github.com/spaetz/notmuch-all-feature.git I
> would like to advocate the following branches for quick pulling. Each
> contains 1 or 2 patches. They have all been based on todays
> cworth/master, so it
On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:57:00 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de
wrote:
From git repository git://github.com/spaetz/notmuch-all-feature.git I
would like to advocate the following branches for quick pulling. Each
contains 1 or 2 patches. They have all been based on todays
Hey james,
i really like your notmuch-retry bits, I've taken that shell script and
integrated it into my tagging script, thanks! I'm curious if you are
going to update your patch for notmuch.el ("Calls to notmuch get queued
and executed asynchronously") to use this, or if you are going to have
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:25:16 -0500, James Vasile
wrote:
> I'm curious as to what people are doing in this regard.
I am pretty good at evangelizing notmuch and converted another
person[0]... in doing so I realized I had to walk through a few issues
to get them started.
The initial
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:25:16 -0500, James Vasile ja...@hackervisions.org
wrote:
I'm curious as to what people are doing in this regard.
I am pretty good at evangelizing notmuch and converted another
person[0]... in doing so I realized I had to walk through a few issues
to get them started.
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:20:54 +0100 (CET), racin at free.fr wrote:
> Using a prefix arg to invert search order would conflict with my patch
> http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/2009/000914.html in which the
> prefix arg is used to show deleted messages. I don't known which
> behaviour for
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:20:54 +0100 (CET), ra...@free.fr wrote:
Using a prefix arg to invert search order would conflict with my patch
http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/2009/000914.html in which the
prefix arg is used to show deleted messages. I don't known which
behaviour for prefix
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:20:00 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> I investigated a bit and discovered that the images are being rendered
> within emacs and inside of a temporary buffer that is being used by the
> function invoked by 'v'. Before this function returns, the temporary
> buffer including the
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:20:00 -0800, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
I investigated a bit and discovered that the images are being rendered
within emacs and inside of a temporary buffer that is being used by the
function invoked by 'v'. Before this function returns, the temporary
buffer
On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:47:03 -0500, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:39:22 -0500, micah anderson
> wrote:
> > Welcome to how gmail does it.
>
> Why welcome me to "how gmail does it"?! I never wanted to go there!
Because the perception of the inter
On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:49:21 -0500, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> A policy of only returning one is going to be problematic for folks who
> want or expect to see the other. And in fact think I want to see both.
> I have both, and I've asked notmuch to index both, so why shouldn't it
> return
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 02:45:24 +, Olly Betts wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 02:35:14PM -0500, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:06:59 + (UTC), Olly Betts
> > wrote:
> >
> > I just installed this new version from a Debian experimental repo,
> > rebuilt notmuch against the
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 02:45:24 +, Olly Betts o...@survex.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 02:35:14PM -0500, Jameson Rollins wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:06:59 + (UTC), Olly Betts o...@survex.com
wrote:
I just installed this new version from a Debian experimental repo,
rebuilt
On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:37:57 -0500, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 09:41:41 +1300, martin f krafft
> wrote:
> > also sprach David Bremner [2010.02.04.0924 +1300]:
> > > > PS: speaking of prefixes, how about remving the subject prefix of
> > > > this list in general? ;)
> > >
> >
On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 23:44:56 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> So Keith tells me he's entirely unimpressed with my website-design
> skills as evidenced by http://notmuchmail.org .
>
> In an effort to fix this, I've switched from the single, static HTML
> page that was there previously, to now using
On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 13:22:29 -0500, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> I'm starting to think that maybe the folder: field is not the right way
> to do this, though. What if a message moves?
The easiest way to answer this question is to try it. I did that, and
things didn't work as expected. I expected
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:25:17 +0100, Michal Sojka wrote:
> This patch was originally sent by Andreas Kl?ckner. This is a slightly
> reworked version (only coding style changes) which was manually rebased
> to the current HEAD.
Just a quick note about this patch: I received an offline email back
Hi Andreas,
I'm just writing because of the patch you sent to the notmuch list on
December 15th. It seems like many people are wanting this functionality,
I know I am myself and Carl has also indicated the same. However, there
were a couple of minor suggestions for improvements for your patch
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:46:43 -0800, sebastian at sspaeth.de wrote:
> > I think it would make sense to move the mainline to git.debian.org
> > for now, or another place where everyone can easily get an account.
> > As alternatives I propose repo.or.cz. I'd prefer to stay away from
> > commercial
Hi Andreas,
I'm just writing because of the patch you sent to the notmuch list on
December 15th. It seems like many people are wanting this functionality,
I know I am myself and Carl has also indicated the same. However, there
were a couple of minor suggestions for improvements for your patch
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:00:46 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth" wrote:
> As I do like some of the additional patches, I am shoving some of them
> into my "all feature" branch. I make that one available in case you
> want to pull from it. It currently carries:
>
> Jameson Rollins: Simplify "unread" tag
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 22:22:01 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 21:28:03 -0600, "Jeffrey C. Ollie"
> wrote:
> > Instead of including a private implementation of the SHA1 hash, use
> > libgcrypt. This means less code of our own to maintain and it will be
> > easier to switch to a
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010 10:21:21 +0100, Ruben Pollan
wrote:
> On 15:56, Fri 08 Jan 10, martin f krafft wrote:
> > How about indexing GPG-encrypted messages?
>
> I think that would be security hole. You should not store the
> encrypted messages on a decrypted database. A solution whould be to
>
On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 12:12:09 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
>You may have to wrap your "notmuch new" call in a "notmuch save",
>"notmuch restore" pair if you discover things coming back to your inbox.
do you mean "notmuch dump" here instead of "notmuch save"?
> The whole
Excerpts from Marten Veldthuis's message of Mon Dec 07 17:55:24 -0500 2009:
> On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 15:02:03 -0400, David Bremner
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:27:05 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
> > It might be a bit blue sky, but if this daemon could (optionally) talk
> > IMAP and
Excerpts from Marten Veldthuis's message of Mon Dec 07 17:55:24 -0500 2009:
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 15:02:03 -0400, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote:
On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:27:05 -0800, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote:
It might be a bit blue sky, but if this daemon could (optionally)
49 matches
Mail list logo