Tomi Ollila writes:
> On Tue, Jun 11 2019, David Bremner wrote:
>
>> The extra flexibility of having both HAVE_EMACS (for yes, there is an
>> emacs we can use) and WITH_EMACS (the user wants emacs support) lead
>> to confusion and bugs. We now just force WITH_EMACS to 0 if no
>> suitable emacs
On Tue, Jun 11 2019, David Bremner wrote:
> The extra flexibility of having both HAVE_EMACS (for yes, there is an
> emacs we can use) and WITH_EMACS (the user wants emacs support) lead
> to confusion and bugs. We now just force WITH_EMACS to 0 if no
> suitable emacs is detected.
LGTM.
Tomi
>
The extra flexibility of having both HAVE_EMACS (for yes, there is an
emacs we can use) and WITH_EMACS (the user wants emacs support) lead
to confusion and bugs. We now just force WITH_EMACS to 0 if no
suitable emacs is detected.
---
configure| 18 --