[PATCH 07/25] test: remove json test for search null result, since it's being more properly tested in search-output

2011-06-01 Thread Carl Worth
On Sat, 28 May 2011 14:51:42 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > The test in json was inferior to the one in search-output, since it > wasn't properly testing for the presence of a trailing newline. Hi Jamie, I've pushed the series up to this point now, (along with the vim improvements that

Re: [PATCH 07/25] test: remove json test for search null result, since it's being more properly tested in search-output

2011-06-01 Thread Carl Worth
On Sat, 28 May 2011 14:51:42 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: The test in json was inferior to the one in search-output, since it wasn't properly testing for the presence of a trailing newline. Hi Jamie, I've pushed the series up to this point now, (along with

[PATCH 07/25] test: remove json test for search null result, since it's being more properly tested in search-output

2011-05-28 Thread Jameson Graef Rollins
The test in json was inferior to the one in search-output, since it wasn't properly testing for the presence of a trailing newline. --- test/json |4 test/search-output |4 +--- 2 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/test/json b/test/json index

[PATCH 07/25] test: remove json test for search null result, since it's being more properly tested in search-output

2011-05-28 Thread Jameson Graef Rollins
The test in json was inferior to the one in search-output, since it wasn't properly testing for the presence of a trailing newline. --- test/json |4 test/search-output |4 +--- 2 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/test/json b/test/json index