On Mon 2019-11-04 23:26:25 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> how bad does out-of-tree build break with this -- do we need to do
> the same as with ruby bindings (copy sources -- do we still do so)? or does
> python provide better alternative..?
I've just posted id:20200522010359.715688-1-...@fifthhorsem
Tomi Ollila writes:
> how bad does out-of-tree build break with this -- do we need to do
> the same as with ruby bindings (copy sources -- do we still do so)? or does
> python provide better alternative..?
Good question. What is here will break with out of tree builds, just
from trivial things
On Sun, Nov 03 2019, David Bremner wrote:
> Put the build product (and tests) in a well known location so that we
> can find them e.g. from the tests.
> ---
> Makefile.local | 2 +-
> bindings/Makefile.local | 9 +
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git
Put the build product (and tests) in a well known location so that we
can find them e.g. from the tests.
---
Makefile.local | 2 +-
bindings/Makefile.local | 9 +
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Makefile.local b/Makefile.local
index 3c6dacbc..7c12612