Hi Bremner--
thanks for the review!
On Sat 2019-08-03 12:15:30 -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes:
>
>> +ret = true;
>> +for (int i = 0; i < g_mime_header_list_get_count
>> (legacy_display_headers); i++) {
>> +GMimeHeader *dh =
Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes:
> + ret = true;
> + for (int i = 0; i < g_mime_header_list_get_count
> (legacy_display_headers); i++) {
> + GMimeHeader *dh = g_mime_header_list_get_header_at
> (legacy_display_headers, i);
> + if (dh == NULL) {
> + ret = false;
>
On Mon 2019-06-24 20:02:13 -0700, William Casarin wrote:
> dkg wrote:
>> +if ((protected_headers = g_mime_object_get_header_list (payload),
>> protected_headers) &&
>> +(legacy_display = GMIME_TEXT_PART (first), legacy_display) &&
>> +(legacy_display_header_text =
Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes:
> This is a utility function designed to make it easier to
> "fast-forward" past a legacy-display part associated with a
> cryptographic envelope, and show the user the intended message body.
>
> The bulk of the ugliness in here is in the test function
>
This is a utility function designed to make it easier to
"fast-forward" past a legacy-display part associated with a
cryptographic envelope, and show the user the intended message body.
The bulk of the ugliness in here is in the test function
_notmuch_crypto_payload_has_legacy_display, which
