Charles Celerier writes:
> Can the variables in the varlist depend on the definition of variables
> that precede them in the list? I believe I tried your suggestion, but
> quickly gave up as Emacs gave me an error claiming that all-tags was
> void.
That's the point of lexical-let* vs
Charles Celerier
writes:
> Can the variables in the varlist depend on the definition of variables
> that precede them in the list? I believe I tried your suggestion, but
> quickly gave up as Emacs gave me an error claiming that all-tags was
> void.
Yes, with the let*/lexical-let* variants of
I see now. I tried using lexical-let*, but now it appears that pulling
the assignment of minibuffer-completion-table into the lexical-let*
breaks the function, while pulling all the other assigments in works
fine. I'm not sure why that happens. I am not a very skilled emacs-lisp
programmer, so I
Can the variables in the varlist depend on the definition of variables
that precede them in the list? I believe I tried your suggestion, but
quickly gave up as Emacs gave me an error claiming that all-tags was
void.
charles
David Edmondson writes:
> On Sat, Nov 29 2014, Charles Celerier wrote:
On Sat, Nov 29 2014, Charles Celerier wrote:
> The notmuch-search-terms man page states that "tag:" is equivalent
> to "is:". Completion for "is:" style searches is now supported
> in the Emacs interface.
>
> Signed-off-by: Charles Celerier
> ---
> emacs/notmuch.el | 11 +++
> 1 file
Charles Celerier ccel...@cs.stanford.edu
writes:
Can the variables in the varlist depend on the definition of variables
that precede them in the list? I believe I tried your suggestion, but
quickly gave up as Emacs gave me an error claiming that all-tags was
void.
Yes, with the
Charles Celerier ccel...@cs.stanford.edu writes:
Can the variables in the varlist depend on the definition of variables
that precede them in the list? I believe I tried your suggestion, but
quickly gave up as Emacs gave me an error claiming that all-tags was
void.
That's the point of
I see now. I tried using lexical-let*, but now it appears that pulling
the assignment of minibuffer-completion-table into the lexical-let*
breaks the function, while pulling all the other assigments in works
fine. I'm not sure why that happens. I am not a very skilled emacs-lisp
programmer, so I
On Sat, Nov 29 2014, Charles Celerier wrote:
The notmuch-search-terms man page states that tag:tag is equivalent
to is:tag. Completion for is:tag style searches is now supported
in the Emacs interface.
Signed-off-by: Charles Celerier ccel...@cs.stanford.edu
---
emacs/notmuch.el | 11
The notmuch-search-terms man page states that "tag:" is equivalent
to "is:". Completion for "is:" style searches is now supported
in the Emacs interface.
Signed-off-by: Charles Celerier
---
emacs/notmuch.el | 11 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git
The notmuch-search-terms man page states that tag:tag is equivalent
to is:tag. Completion for is:tag style searches is now supported
in the Emacs interface.
Signed-off-by: Charles Celerier ccel...@cs.stanford.edu
---
emacs/notmuch.el | 11 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4
11 matches
Mail list logo
