On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:50:53 +0200, Tomi Ollila wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 12:20:31 -0400, David Bremner
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:07:27 +0100, Pieter Praet
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:58:32 -0400, David Bremner
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 5 Feb 2012 11:13:41
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:50:53 +0200, Tomi Ollila tomi.oll...@iki.fi wrote:
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 12:20:31 -0400, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:07:27 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:58:32 -0400, David Bremner da...@tethera.net
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 12:20:31 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:07:27 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> > On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:58:32 -0400, David Bremner
> > wrote:
> > > On Sun, 5 Feb 2012 11:13:41 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin > > gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > How about if '*'
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 12:20:31 -0400, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:07:27 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:58:32 -0400, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote:
On Sun, 5 Feb 2012 11:13:41 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:07:27 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:58:32 -0400, David Bremner
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 5 Feb 2012 11:13:41 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin > gmail.com> wrote:
>
> How about if '*' applies to all messages (as it currently does),
> but 'C-u *' only to open
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 23:38:20 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> [...]
> Same here. In v2 [1], '*' tags all and 'C-u *' tags only open.
>
> One can always swap the keybindings if so inclined.
>
Did I really say that?
There's only a single keybinding, so swap it with *what* ?!? Itself ?
This should
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:07:27 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:58:32 -0400, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote:
On Sun, 5 Feb 2012 11:13:41 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote:
How about if '*' applies to all messages (as it
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:33:35 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:30:29 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:07:27 +0100, Pieter Praet
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:58:32 -0400, David Bremner
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 5 Feb
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:30:29 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:07:27 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> > On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:58:32 -0400, David Bremner
> > wrote:
> > > On Sun, 5 Feb 2012 11:13:41 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin > > gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Changes:
> > > >
> >
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:33:35 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote:
> Also can you please send new patches (and patch series) in a new
> separate thread? If they are related to another thread, you can add a
> reference. But having multiple patch series with multiple versions in a
> single thread is
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:30:29 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:07:27 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> > On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:58:32 -0400, David Bremner
> > wrote:
> > > On Sun, 5 Feb 2012 11:13:41 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin > > gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Changes:
> > > >
> >
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:07:27 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:58:32 -0400, David Bremner
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 5 Feb 2012 11:13:41 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin > gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Changes:
> > >
> > > v4:
> > >
> > > * rebased on master, no conflicts so no need for
On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:58:32 -0400, David Bremner wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Feb 2012 11:13:41 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin gmail.com> wrote:
> > Changes:
> >
> > v4:
> >
> > * rebased on master, no conflicts so no need for another review
> >
>
> I pushed this series.
>
> Maybe this was discussed
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:07:27 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:58:32 -0400, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote:
On Sun, 5 Feb 2012 11:13:41 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote:
Changes:
v4:
* rebased on master, no
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:30:29 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:07:27 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:58:32 -0400, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote:
On Sun, 5 Feb 2012 11:13:41 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:33:35 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote:
Also can you please send new patches (and patch series) in a new
separate thread? If they are related to another thread, you can add a
reference. But having multiple patch series with multiple versions in
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:30:29 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:07:27 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:58:32 -0400, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote:
On Sun, 5 Feb 2012 11:13:41 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:33:35 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:30:29 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:07:27 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:58:32 -0400, David
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 23:38:20 +0100, Pieter Praet pie...@praet.org wrote:
[...]
Same here. In v2 [1], '*' tags all and 'C-u *' tags only open.
One can always swap the keybindings if so inclined.
Did I really say that?
There's only a single keybinding, so swap it with *what* ?!? Itself ?
On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:58:32 -0400, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote:
On Sun, 5 Feb 2012 11:13:41 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote:
Changes:
v4:
* rebased on master, no conflicts so no need for another review
I pushed this series.
Maybe this
On Sun, 5 Feb 2012 11:13:41 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote:
> Changes:
>
> v4:
>
> * rebased on master, no conflicts so no need for another review
>
I pushed this series.
Maybe this was discussed already, but I think ideally * would apply only
to open messages. So consider that a feature
On Sun, 5 Feb 2012 11:13:41 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin
dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote:
Changes:
v4:
* rebased on master, no conflicts so no need for another review
I pushed this series.
Maybe this was discussed already, but I think ideally * would apply only
to open messages. So
Changes:
v4:
* rebased on master, no conflicts so no need for another review
v4:
* rebased on master after Jameson's archiving changes
v3:
* merged 3 `notmuch-show-tag-all'-related patches into one
* add patch to clean up tagging function argument names
* fix other comments from Austin's
Changes:
v4:
* rebased on master, no conflicts so no need for another review
v4:
* rebased on master after Jameson's archiving changes
v3:
* merged 3 `notmuch-show-tag-all'-related patches into one
* add patch to clean up tagging function argument names
* fix other comments from Austin's
24 matches
Mail list logo