On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:22:09 -0500, Jameson Rollins wrote:
> To me it seems the issue here is the distinction between the notmuch
> CLI, and any other reader UI that uses it. AFAICT, the CLI actually has
> no need to know what "your" email address is, so I don't see why it
> should be configured
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:49:35 +0100, Michal Sojka wrote:
> Hmm, I understand. My worry about this approach is the following: Now it
> is very straightforward to start using notmuch. You only answer a few
> questions when you run notmuch for the first time and then it works. If
> we apply your patch
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:49:35 +0100, Michal Sojka wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Mar 2010, James Vasile wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:22:41 +0100, Michal Sojka
> > wrote:
> > > thanks for clarification. It all sounds reasonable. The only problem I
> > > can see now is that if I create a new account on m
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010, James Vasile wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:22:41 +0100, Michal Sojka
> wrote:
> > thanks for clarification. It all sounds reasonable. The only problem I
> > can see now is that if I create a new account on my machine and run
> > emacs there, then the value of user-mail-addr
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:22:09 -0500, Jameson Rollins
wrote:
> To me it seems the issue here is the distinction between the notmuch
> CLI, and any other reader UI that uses it. AFAICT, the CLI actually has
> no need to know what "your" email address is, so I don't see why it
> should be configured
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:49:35 +0100, Michal Sojka wrote:
> Hmm, I understand. My worry about this approach is the following: Now it
> is very straightforward to start using notmuch. You only answer a few
> questions when you run notmuch for the first time and then it works. If
> we apply your patch
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:49:35 +0100, Michal Sojka wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Mar 2010, James Vasile wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:22:41 +0100, Michal Sojka
> > wrote:
> > > thanks for clarification. It all sounds reasonable. The only problem I
> > > can see now is that if I create a new account on m
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010, James Vasile wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:22:41 +0100, Michal Sojka wrote:
> > thanks for clarification. It all sounds reasonable. The only problem I
> > can see now is that if I create a new account on my machine and run
> > emacs there, then the value of user-mail-address
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010, James Vasile wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:00:08 +0100, Michal Sojka
> wrote:
> > Hi James,
> >
> > On Tue, 09 Mar 2010, James Vasile wrote:
> > > When notmuch creates a reply buffer, it guesses the From and Bcc
> > > addresses. The client is in a better position to guess
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:22:41 +0100, Michal Sojka wrote:
> thanks for clarification. It all sounds reasonable. The only problem I
> can see now is that if I create a new account on my machine and run
> emacs there, then the value of user-mail-address is @
> which doesn't refer to existing mailbox.
Hi James,
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010, James Vasile wrote:
> When notmuch creates a reply buffer, it guesses the From and Bcc
> addresses. The client is in a better position to guess these, and this
> patch adjusts notmuch-reply accordingly.
>
> diff --git a/notmuch.el b/notmuch.el
> index ab56f48..07f9
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:22:41 +0100, Michal Sojka wrote:
> thanks for clarification. It all sounds reasonable. The only problem I
> can see now is that if I create a new account on my machine and run
> emacs there, then the value of user-mail-address is @
> which doesn't refer to existing mailbox.
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:00:08 +0100, Michal Sojka wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> On Tue, 09 Mar 2010, James Vasile wrote:
> > When notmuch creates a reply buffer, it guesses the From and Bcc
> > addresses. The client is in a better position to guess these, and this
> > patch adjusts notmuch-reply accordi
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010, James Vasile wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:00:08 +0100, Michal Sojka wrote:
> > Hi James,
> >
> > On Tue, 09 Mar 2010, James Vasile wrote:
> > > When notmuch creates a reply buffer, it guesses the From and Bcc
> > > addresses. The client is in a better position to guess th
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:00:08 +0100, Michal Sojka wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> On Tue, 09 Mar 2010, James Vasile wrote:
> > When notmuch creates a reply buffer, it guesses the From and Bcc
> > addresses. The client is in a better position to guess these, and this
> > patch adjusts notmuch-reply accordi
Hi James,
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010, James Vasile wrote:
> When notmuch creates a reply buffer, it guesses the From and Bcc
> addresses. The client is in a better position to guess these, and this
> patch adjusts notmuch-reply accordingly.
>
> diff --git a/notmuch.el b/notmuch.el
> index ab56f48..07f9
When notmuch creates a reply buffer, it guesses the From and Bcc
addresses. The client is in a better position to guess these, and this
patch adjusts notmuch-reply accordingly.
diff --git a/notmuch.el b/notmuch.el
index ab56f48..07f957e 100644
--- a/notmuch.el
+++ b/notmuch.el
@@ -436,10 +436,20
When notmuch creates a reply buffer, it guesses the From and Bcc
addresses. The client is in a better position to guess these, and this
patch adjusts notmuch-reply accordingly.
diff --git a/notmuch.el b/notmuch.el
index ab56f48..07f957e 100644
--- a/notmuch.el
+++ b/notmuch.el
@@ -436,10 +436,20
18 matches
Mail list logo
