On Tue, 8 Dec 2009 18:07:43 -0400, david at tethera.net wrote:
> This is posting 3 of the patch. The second version fixed a bug. This
> version replaces calloc/realloc with talloc equivalents, prettifies
> the comparison function for qsort, reindents, and adds a bunch of
> whitespace.
It's odd
On Tue, 8 Dec 2009 18:07:43 -0400, da...@tethera.net wrote:
This is posting 3 of the patch. The second version fixed a bug. This
version replaces calloc/realloc with talloc equivalents, prettifies
the comparison function for qsort, reindents, and adds a bunch of
whitespace.
It's odd that
From: David Bremner
The main feature of this patch is that it compares the list of current
tags on a message with those read by restore. Only if the two lists
differ is the tag list in the message replaced. In my experiments this leads to
a large performance improvement.
Since
On Mon, 7 Dec 2009 23:14:48 -0400, david at tethera.net wrote:
> The main feature of this patch is that it compares the list of current
> tags on a message with those read by restore. Only if the two lists
> differ is the tag list in the message replaced. In my experiments this leads
> to
> a
From: David Bremner brem...@unb.ca
The main feature of this patch is that it compares the list of current
tags on a message with those read by restore. Only if the two lists
differ is the tag list in the message replaced. In my experiments this leads to
a large performance improvement.
Since I
From: David Bremner
The main feature of this patch is that it compares the list of current
tags on a message with those read by restore. Only if the two lists
differ is the tag list in the message replaced. In my experiments this leads to
a large performance improvement.
Since
Excerpts from david's message of Mon Dec 07 19:14:48 -0800 2009:
> The patch allocates a temporary array to keep track of the current
> list of tags using calloc and grows it as neccesary using realloc.
The codebase has already well established the use of the talloc library. Why
did you break
From: David Bremner brem...@unb.ca
The main feature of this patch is that it compares the list of current
tags on a message with those read by restore. Only if the two lists
differ is the tag list in the message replaced. In my experiments this leads to
a large performance improvement.
Since I
Excerpts from david's message of Mon Dec 07 19:14:48 -0800 2009:
The patch allocates a temporary array to keep track of the current
list of tags using calloc and grows it as neccesary using realloc.
The codebase has already well established the use of the talloc library. Why
did you break with
From: David Bremner
The main feature of this patch is that it compares the list of current
tags on a message with those read by restore. Only if the two lists
differ is the tag list in the message replaced. In my experiments this leads to
a large performance improvement.
Since
10 matches
Mail list logo