On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:21:19 +0100, Jed Brown wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:07:57 +0100, Carl Worth wrote:
> > One thing we'll still have to think about is how to remove the "virtual
> > tags" from the completion list, (once we have virtual tags in the
> > configuration file---that is, tags
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:07:57 +0100, Carl Worth wrote:
> One thing we'll still have to think about is how to remove the "virtual
> tags" from the completion list, (once we have virtual tags in the
> configuration file---that is, tags applied automatically based on search
> specifications).
Do
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:07:14 +0100, Jan Janak wrote:
> My patch no longer works and I have been thinking about updating it to
> current HEAD. But before I do that, I wanted to check with you to see
> if you would prefer to use a different name for the command, here are
> some options:
>
> 1)
* Carl Worth [091121 18:08]:
> Another option would be to just call this "notmuch search" and have an
> option to control what is output:
>
>notmuch search # for threads, as currently
>notmuch search --output=tags
>notmuch search --output=messages
>
> Actually, I kind of
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:52:49 +0100, Jan Janak wrote:
>> I implemented a new notmuch command that can be used to list all tags
>> present in the database:
>
> Ah, very very interesting! I'd been planning on doing something like
> this soon. And
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 10:59:13 -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> I've been pondering approaches to prioritizing the pool of unread
> messages. Most of my thinking so far is along the lines of the ability
> to automatically apply tags to new messages on various criteria combined
> with the ability to
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:52:49 +0100, Jan Janak wrote:
>> I implemented a new notmuch command that can be used to list all tags
>> present in the database:
>
> Ah, very very interesting! I'd been planning on doing something like
> this soon. And
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:52:49 +0100, Jan Janak wrote:
> I implemented a new notmuch command that can be used to list all tags
> present in the database:
Ah, very very interesting! I'd been planning on doing something like
this soon. And I was just thinking of "notmuch tags" as the command
line.
Carl and others,
I implemented a new notmuch command that can be used to list all tags
present in the database:
$ notmuch list tags
If you run this, you'll get an alphabetically sorted list of all
tags--one tag per line.
The main reason why I implemented this is because I am also working on
Here we create a new notmuch command called list. The purpose of the
command is to produce various lists from the notmuch database.
At the moment we support only one command, notmuch list tags. This
command creates a list of all tags found in the database.
Signed-off-by: Jan Janak
---
On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 15:41 +0100, Carl Worth wrote:
> The other reason I've wanted this is have something like a "folder view"
> that would show a list of tags and a number of messages with each tag,
> (or a number of messages with that tag and the inbox tag).
>
> I know that Keith said he'd
11 matches
Mail list logo
