On Wednesday 27 of January 2010 16:55:55 micah anderson wrote:
> have not seen a reply from you yet. I'm particularly eager to see this
> get accepted upstream, and it sounds like the changes necessary to do so
> are relatively minor.
Hi Micah and others,
I wanted to test this patch, so I rebased
On Wednesday 27 of January 2010 16:55:55 micah anderson wrote:
> have not seen a reply from you yet. I'm particularly eager to see this
> get accepted upstream, and it sounds like the changes necessary to do so
> are relatively minor.
Hi Micah and others,
I wanted to test this patch, so I rebased
Hi Andreas,
I'm just writing because of the patch you sent to the notmuch list on
December 15th. It seems like many people are wanting this functionality,
I know I am myself and Carl has also indicated the same. However, there
were a couple of minor suggestions for improvements for your patch tha
Hi Andreas,
I'm just writing because of the patch you sent to the notmuch list on
December 15th. It seems like many people are wanting this functionality,
I know I am myself and Carl has also indicated the same. However, there
were a couple of minor suggestions for improvements for your patch tha
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 13:16:35 +0100, Ruben Pollan
wrote:
> The patch works fine for me. I like it handles nicely the .foo.bar
> directories
> so I can do searches for "folder:foo" and for "folder:bar".
>
> Reviewed-by: Ruben Pollan
Second that, and I actually think it's a nicer solution than
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:21:50 -0500, Andreas Klöckner
wrote:
> I've patched notmuch to retain information on which folder emails are stored
> in. This makes the transition from a folders-and-procmail model somewhat
> easier. The resulting changes are attached.
Very nice. I like this idea very m
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:21:50 -0500, Andreas Kl?ckner wrote:
> I've patched notmuch to retain information on which folder emails are stored
> in. This makes the transition from a folders-and-procmail model somewhat
> easier. The resulting changes are attached.
Very nice. I like this idea very mu
Some errors applying the patch:
[meskio at blackspot:src/notmuch.orig]$ git apply
~/0001-Preseve-folder-information-when-indexing.patch
/home/meskio/0001-Preseve-folder-information-when-indexing.patch:136: trailing
whitespace.
status = notmuch_database_add_message (notmuch, next,
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 13:16:35 +0100, Ruben Pollan wrote:
> The patch works fine for me. I like it handles nicely the .foo.bar
> directories
> so I can do searches for "folder:foo" and for "folder:bar".
>
> Reviewed-by: Ruben Pollan
Second that, and I actually think it's a nicer solution than
a
Some errors applying the patch:
[mes...@blackspot:src/notmuch.orig]$ git apply
~/0001-Preseve-folder-information-when-indexing.patch
/home/meskio/0001-Preseve-folder-information-when-indexing.patch:136: trailing
whitespace.
status = notmuch_database_add_message (notmuch, next,
/
Hi there,
I've patched notmuch to retain information on which folder emails are stored
in. This makes the transition from a folders-and-procmail model somewhat
easier. The resulting changes are attached.
Andreas
From 179af7f436d8c21bad90e7eb88fc17c56f83c26c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrea
Hi there,
I've patched notmuch to retain information on which folder emails are stored
in. This makes the transition from a folders-and-procmail model somewhat
easier. The resulting changes are attached.
Andreas
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name:
12 matches
Mail list logo