On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 10:17:01 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> > I fear this is not correct. I cloned notmuch from Carl's git repository,
> > and whenever I press 'RET' while the point is over the subject line, the
> > result is the same as pressing 'h': the subject information gets toggled.
>
> Is
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 10:17:01 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 14:03:44 -0300, Fernando Carrijo yahoo.com.br> wrote:
> > David Edmondson wrote:
> > > 'RET' anywhere in the message is supposed to toggle visibility of the
> > > message. That was not working perfectly - a little f
David Edmondson wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 14:03:44 -0300, Fernando Carrijo yahoo.com.br> wrote:
> > David Edmondson wrote:
> > > 'RET' anywhere in the message is supposed to toggle visibility of the
> > > message. That was not working perfectly - a little forced redisplay
> > > helped (just p
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 07:46:40 +0200, Michal Sojka
> wrote:
> > I don't think this can be solved only in Makefile. From my look at dme's
> > repo, he adds a new subcomand 'part', which is used by the UI. So if you
> > want to use the new UI and your ot
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 03:41:32 +0200, "Sebastian Spaeth" wrote:
> It works really nice and I get the (unmeasured) feeling that it is
> faster too (but then it might just be the lack of my additional patches
> which slow things down :-)).
I'm not sure why it would be faster. If you have a long threa
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 14:03:44 -0300, Fernando Carrijo
wrote:
> David Edmondson wrote:
> > 'RET' anywhere in the message is supposed to toggle visibility of the
> > message. That was not working perfectly - a little forced redisplay
> > helped (just pushed).
> >
> > Toggling the visibility of hea
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 07:46:40 +0200, Michal Sojka wrote:
> I don't think this can be solved only in Makefile. From my look at dme's
> repo, he adds a new subcomand 'part', which is used by the UI. So if you
> want to use the new UI and your other features, you need to merge the
> things together.
David Edmondson wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 14:03:44 -0300, Fernando Carrijo
> wrote:
> > David Edmondson wrote:
> > > 'RET' anywhere in the message is supposed to toggle visibility of the
> > > message. That was not working perfectly - a little forced redisplay
> > > helped (just pushed).
> >
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 10:17:01 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> > I fear this is not correct. I cloned notmuch from Carl's git repository,
> > and whenever I press 'RET' while the point is over the subject line, the
> > result is the same as pressing 'h': the subject information gets toggled.
>
> Is
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 10:17:01 +0100, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 14:03:44 -0300, Fernando Carrijo
> wrote:
> > David Edmondson wrote:
> > > 'RET' anywhere in the message is supposed to toggle visibility of the
> > > message. That was not working perfectly - a little forced redis
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 03:41:32 +0200, "Sebastian Spaeth"
wrote:
> It works really nice and I get the (unmeasured) feeling that it is
> faster too (but then it might just be the lack of my additional patches
> which slow things down :-)).
I'm not sure why it would be faster. If you have a long thre
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 14:03:44 -0300, Fernando Carrijo
wrote:
> David Edmondson wrote:
> > 'RET' anywhere in the message is supposed to toggle visibility of the
> > message. That was not working perfectly - a little forced redisplay
> > helped (just pushed).
> >
> > Toggling the visibility of hea
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 07:46:40 +0200, Michal Sojka wrote:
> > I don't think this can be solved only in Makefile. From my look at dme's
> > repo, he adds a new subcomand 'part', which is used by the UI. So if you
> > want to use the new UI and your other
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 07:46:40 +0200, Michal Sojka wrote:
> I don't think this can be solved only in Makefile. From my look at dme's
> repo, he adds a new subcomand 'part', which is used by the UI. So if you
> want to use the new UI and your other features, you need to merge the
> things together.
Fernando Carrijo wrote:
> David Edmondson wrote:
> > 'RET' anywhere in the message is supposed to toggle visibility of the
> > message. That was not working perfectly - a little forced redisplay
> > helped (just pushed).
> >
> > Toggling the visibility of headers is done with 'h'. There's curren
David Edmondson wrote:
> 'RET' anywhere in the message is supposed to toggle visibility of the
> message. That was not working perfectly - a little forced redisplay
> helped (just pushed).
>
> Toggling the visibility of headers is done with 'h'. There's currently
> no way to do that by pressing '
Fernando Carrijo wrote:
> David Edmondson wrote:
> > 'RET' anywhere in the message is supposed to toggle visibility of the
> > message. That was not working perfectly - a little forced redisplay
> > helped (just pushed).
> >
> > Toggling the visibility of headers is done with 'h'. There's curren
David Edmondson wrote:
> 'RET' anywhere in the message is supposed to toggle visibility of the
> message. That was not working perfectly - a little forced redisplay
> helped (just pushed).
>
> Toggling the visibility of headers is done with 'h'. There's currently
> no way to do that by pressing '
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:47:39 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> > I'm pushed the first stage of a JSON based emacs UI to the repository at
> > http://github.com/dme/notmuch (it's in the "master" branch).
>
> Despite the switch to daylight savings time s
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:47:39 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> I'm pushed the first stage of a JSON based emacs UI to the repository at
> http://github.com/dme/notmuch (it's in the "master" branch).
Despite the switch to daylight savings time stealing me an hour of this
night, I managed to test you
On Sun, 28 Mar 2010, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:47:39 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> > I'm pushed the first stage of a JSON based emacs UI to the repository at
> > http://github.com/dme/notmuch (it's in the "master" branch).
>
> Despite the switch to daylight savings time s
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:47:39 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> I'm pushed the first stage of a JSON based emacs UI to the repository at
> http://github.com/dme/notmuch (it's in the "master" branch).
Despite the switch to daylight savings time stealing me an hour of this
night, I managed to test you
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:47:39 +, David Edmondson wrote:
I found another issue. In the notmuch-show-mode "RET" key on from and
subject doesn't seem to work.
For ex: for the last message "RET" key on from doesn't fold the message.
For all the message "RET" key on subject doesn't show the messag
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 20:21:46 +0530, "Aneesh Kumar K. V" wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:47:39 +, David Edmondson wrote:
>
> I found another issue. In the notmuch-show-mode "RET" key on from and
> subject doesn't seem to work.
>
> For ex: for the last message "RET" key on from doesn't fold t
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 20:21:46 +0530, "Aneesh Kumar K. V"
wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:47:39 +, David Edmondson wrote:
>
> I found another issue. In the notmuch-show-mode "RET" key on from and
> subject doesn't seem to work.
>
> For ex: for the last message "RET" key on from doesn't fold
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 05:07:49 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal
wrote:
> There's a complaint when I open a (multipart?) message:
>
> invalid function: mm-make-handle
>
> Adding "(require 'mm-decode)" to notmuch-show.el fixes this problem.
Sorry about that. The repository is updated accordingly.
dme.
--
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:14:09 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:11:38 +0530, "Aneesh Kumar K. V" linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > Is there a way to get the inline patches shown similar to
> > diff-mode not just the attached patches ?
>
> A new hook function for text/plain parts
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:16:12 +0530, "Aneesh Kumar K. V" wrote:
> That worked. Thanks. BTW is there a way to get '=' to reload the thread
> details. Something similar to notmuch-search-refresh-view. for the show
> window.
I'll look at adding it.
> That would make sure i can get the tag updated ta
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:47:39 +, David Edmondson wrote:
I found another issue. In the notmuch-show-mode "RET" key on from and
subject doesn't seem to work.
For ex: for the last message "RET" key on from doesn't fold the message.
For all the message "RET" key on subject doesn't show the messag
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 05:07:49 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal wrote:
> There's a complaint when I open a (multipart?) message:
>
> invalid function: mm-make-handle
>
> Adding "(require 'mm-decode)" to notmuch-show.el fixes this problem.
Sorry about that. The repository is updated accordingly.
dme.
--
D
Hi David,
Thanks for this -- it really looks great so far.
> As always, feedback (especially if something breaks) appreciated.
There's a complaint when I open a (multipart?) message:
invalid function: mm-make-handle
Adding "(require 'mm-decode)" to notmuch-show.el fixes this problem.
Best,
Je
Hi David,
Thanks for this -- it really looks great so far.
> As always, feedback (especially if something breaks) appreciated.
There's a complaint when I open a (multipart?) message:
invalid function: mm-make-handle
Adding "(require 'mm-decode)" to notmuch-show.el fixes this problem.
Best,
Je
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:16:12 +0530, "Aneesh Kumar K. V"
wrote:
> That worked. Thanks. BTW is there a way to get '=' to reload the thread
> details. Something similar to notmuch-search-refresh-view. for the show
> window.
I'll look at adding it.
> That would make sure i can get the tag updated t
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:14:09 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:11:38 +0530, "Aneesh Kumar K. V"
> wrote:
> > Is there a way to get the inline patches shown similar to
> > diff-mode not just the attached patches ?
>
> A new hook function for text/plain parts called
> `notmuc
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 07:32:41 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:47:39 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> > I've pushed the first stage of a JSON based emacs UI to the repository
> > at http://github.com/dme/notmuch (it's in the "master" branch).
> >
> > This is intended to be fu
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:11:38 +0530, "Aneesh Kumar K. V" wrote:
> Is there a way to get the inline patches shown similar to
> diff-mode not just the attached patches ?
A new hook function for text/plain parts called
`notmuch-wash-inline-patch' is added that attempts to do this by
converting the in
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 10:11:38 +0530, "Aneesh Kumar K. V"
wrote:
> Is there a way to get the inline patches shown similar to
> diff-mode not just the attached patches ?
A new hook function for text/plain parts called
`notmuch-wash-inline-patch' is added that attempts to do this by
converting the i
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 07:32:41 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:47:39 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> > I've pushed the first stage of a JSON based emacs UI to the repository
> > at http://github.com/dme/notmuch (it's in the "master" branch).
> >
> > This is intended to be fu
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 07:32:41 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> Image inlining doesn't work, even for simple image/jpeg attachments. I'm
> still puzzling over this - the output from 'notmuch part' seems fine,
> but the lisp code to generate the image and insert it at the right place
> is broken.
Thi
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 07:32:41 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> Image inlining doesn't work, even for simple image/jpeg attachments. I'm
> still puzzling over this - the output from 'notmuch part' seems fine,
> but the lisp code to generate the image and insert it at the right place
> is broken.
Thi
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:47:39 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> I've pushed the first stage of a JSON based emacs UI to the repository
> at http://github.com/dme/notmuch (it's in the "master" branch).
>
> This is intended to be functionally equivalent to the current UI, though
> HTML display is not
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:47:39 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> I've pushed the first stage of a JSON based emacs UI to the repository
> at http://github.com/dme/notmuch (it's in the "master" branch).
>
> This is intended to be functionally equivalent to the current UI, though
> HTML display is not
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:47:39 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> This is lightly tested, but if anyone else wants to give it a try I
> would be interested in feedback. There were a couple of places in the
> current code where I wasn't completely sure of the intention, so I may
> have inadvertently div
I'm pushed the first stage of a JSON based emacs UI to the repository at
http://github.com/dme/notmuch (it's in the "master" branch).
This is intended to be functionally equivalent to the current UI, though
HTML display is not present (see below).
This is lightly tested, but if anyone else wants
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:47:39 +, David Edmondson wrote:
> This is lightly tested, but if anyone else wants to give it a try I
> would be interested in feedback. There were a couple of places in the
> current code where I wasn't completely sure of the intention, so I may
> have inadvertently div
I'm pushed the first stage of a JSON based emacs UI to the repository at
http://github.com/dme/notmuch (it's in the "master" branch).
This is intended to be functionally equivalent to the current UI, though
HTML display is not present (see below).
This is lightly tested, but if anyone else wants
46 matches
Mail list logo