[notmuch] Rework of attachment saving

2009-12-14 Thread Carl Worth
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 10:13:57 -0800, camalot at picnicpark.org wrote: > I think I've reworked the attachment savings to behave as we've been > discussing. I don't know anything about the button handling so I > haven't attempted to implement the direct manipulation approach of of > saving using the

[notmuch] Rework of attachment saving

2009-12-14 Thread cama...@picnicpark.org
I think I've reworked the attachment savings to behave as we've been discussing. I don't know anything about the button handling so I haven't attempted to implement the direct manipulation approach of of saving using the buttons. That would certainly be nice to have however and I belive this

[notmuch] Rework of attachment saving

2009-12-14 Thread camalot
I think I've reworked the attachment savings to behave as we've been discussing. I don't know anything about the button handling so I haven't attempted to implement the direct manipulation approach of of saving using the buttons. That would certainly be nice to have however and I belive this

Re: [notmuch] Rework of attachment saving

2009-12-14 Thread Carl Worth
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 10:13:57 -0800, cama...@picnicpark.org wrote: I think I've reworked the attachment savings to behave as we've been discussing. I don't know anything about the button handling so I haven't attempted to implement the direct manipulation approach of of saving using the