also sprach David Bremner [2010.02.07.1238 +1300]:
> I have to say that merge conflicts are not very much fun. I tend
> to do a certain amount of oh, take all the changes from the
> server. I wonder if the approach that someone else mentioned of
> keeping a file tags/message-id with the appropria
On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 17:41:48 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
[talking about gitmuch, a simple wrapper around notmuch dump && git commit]
>
> And it's interesting that this script might be just good enough for the
> synchronization needs of some people. It's not integrated, and might
> require manual fi
also sprach David Bremner [2010.02.07.1238 +1300]:
> I have to say that merge conflicts are not very much fun. I tend
> to do a certain amount of oh, take all the changes from the
> server. I wonder if the approach that someone else mentioned of
> keeping a file tags/message-id with the appropria
On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 17:41:48 -0800, Carl Worth wrote:
[talking about gitmuch, a simple wrapper around notmuch dump && git commit]
>
> And it's interesting that this script might be just good enough for the
> synchronization needs of some people. It's not integrated, and might
> require manual fi
On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 15:26:56 -0400, da...@tethera.net wrote:
> > I think this will be obsolete pretty soon when the equivalent is
> > built-in to notmuch, but in the mean time, here is a script that
> > somebody might find useful: retag a whole directory (recursively). I
> > don't claim it is nice
On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 15:26:56 -0400, david at tethera.net wrote:
> > I think this will be obsolete pretty soon when the equivalent is
> > built-in to notmuch, but in the mean time, here is a script that
> > somebody might find useful: retag a whole directory (recursively). I
> > don't claim it is ni
At Thu, 03 Dec 2009 09:39:32 -0400,
david at tethera.net wrote:
> I think this will be obsolete pretty soon when the equivalent is
> built-in to notmuch, but in the mean time, here is a script that
> somebody might find useful: retag a whole directory (recursively). I
> don't claim it is nice in an
At Thu, 03 Dec 2009 09:39:32 -0400,
da...@tethera.net wrote:
> I think this will be obsolete pretty soon when the equivalent is
> built-in to notmuch, but in the mean time, here is a script that
> somebody might find useful: retag a whole directory (recursively). I
> don't claim it is nice in any w
I think this will be obsolete pretty soon when the equivalent is
built-in to notmuch, but in the mean time, here is a script that
somebody might find useful: retag a whole directory (recursively). I
don't claim it is nice in any way, but it seems usable for me, taking
about 5 seconds to retag a di
I think this will be obsolete pretty soon when the equivalent is
built-in to notmuch, but in the mean time, here is a script that
somebody might find useful: retag a whole directory (recursively). I
don't claim it is nice in any way, but it seems usable for me, taking
about 5 seconds to retag a di
10 matches
Mail list logo
