[notmuch] notmuch for mutt (was: vim client)

2010-02-21 Thread Ruben Pollan
On 07:56, Sun 21 Feb 10, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Ruben Pollan  [2010.02.19.2112 +0100]:
> > > 1. will there be a usable  ncurses or mutt version that supports
> > > notmuch anytime soon?
> > 
> > I started to work on that I while ago. I didn't hack on it for
> > a while, but I hope I'll return to it soon. Anyway to create
> > a proper good client is a lot of work, I don't think I'll be able
> > to make something usable in months (if I ever make it).
> 
> How would mutt support notmuch? Could you elaborate on the way you
> plan to integrate them?

Ups. I see I explained it wrong. I started to create a ncurses client. I
didn't think about mutt.

I'm not sure if notmuch can be well integrated on mutt. They have kind of
different approach. Maybe the best way to integrate it is the notmuch-fuse that
someone propose a while ago in this list.


-- 
Rub?n Poll?n  | jabber:meskio at jabber.org
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Nos vamos a Croatan.
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: 



[notmuch] notmuch for mutt (was: vim client)

2010-02-21 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Ruben Pollan  [2010.02.19.2112 +0100]:
> > 1. will there be a usable  ncurses or mutt version that supports
> > notmuch anytime soon?
> 
> I started to work on that I while ago. I didn't hack on it for
> a while, but I hope I'll return to it soon. Anyway to create
> a proper good client is a lot of work, I don't think I'll be able
> to make something usable in months (if I ever make it).

How would mutt support notmuch? Could you elaborate on the way you
plan to integrate them?

-- 
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/

"it is easier to be a lover than a husband for the simple reason
 that it is more difficult to be witty every day
 than to say pretty things from time to time."
   -- honor? de balzac

spamtraps: madduck.bogus at madduck.net
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
URL: 



Re: [notmuch] notmuch for mutt (was: vim client)

2010-02-21 Thread Ruben Pollan
On 07:56, Sun 21 Feb 10, martin f krafft wrote:
 also sprach Ruben Pollan mes...@sindominio.net [2010.02.19.2112 +0100]:
   1. will there be a usable  ncurses or mutt version that supports
   notmuch anytime soon?
  
  I started to work on that I while ago. I didn't hack on it for
  a while, but I hope I'll return to it soon. Anyway to create
  a proper good client is a lot of work, I don't think I'll be able
  to make something usable in months (if I ever make it).
 
 How would mutt support notmuch? Could you elaborate on the way you
 plan to integrate them?

Ups. I see I explained it wrong. I started to create a ncurses client. I
didn't think about mutt.

I'm not sure if notmuch can be well integrated on mutt. They have kind of
different approach. Maybe the best way to integrate it is the notmuch-fuse that
someone propose a while ago in this list.


-- 
Rubén Pollán  | jabber:mes...@jabber.org
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Nos vamos a Croatan.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch


[notmuch] notmuch for mutt (was: vim client)

2010-02-20 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Ruben Pollan mes...@sindominio.net [2010.02.19.2112 +0100]:
  1. will there be a usable  ncurses or mutt version that supports
  notmuch anytime soon?
 
 I started to work on that I while ago. I didn't hack on it for
 a while, but I hope I'll return to it soon. Anyway to create
 a proper good client is a lot of work, I don't think I'll be able
 to make something usable in months (if I ever make it).

How would mutt support notmuch? Could you elaborate on the way you
plan to integrate them?

-- 
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
 
it is easier to be a lover than a husband for the simple reason
 that it is more difficult to be witty every day
 than to say pretty things from time to time.
   -- honoré de balzac
 
spamtraps: madduck.bo...@madduck.net


digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch