On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 18:02:59 -0500, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 20:32:27 +0200, Arian Kuschki
> wrote:
> > So one could query with sysconf and break things up into multiple
> > commands as needed.
> >
> > Doesn't xargs do exactly this?
>
> Almost.
>
> The arguments being passed to
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 20:32:27 +0200, Arian Kuschki
wrote:
> So one could query with sysconf and break things up into multiple
> commands as needed.
>
> Doesn't xargs do exactly this?
Almost.
The arguments being passed to the "notmuch tag" command in this case
look like:
notmuch tag -in
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 08:43:19 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> In fact, until we have some sort of daemon that we can feed
> arbitrarily-long lists to, that's what we should do.
Thinking about loud... What if the sub-commands which accept potentially
long argument lists (most of them?) sprouted a '--std
Hi
-Original Message-
From: Carl Worth
Sent: 17 April 2010 17:43
So one could query with sysconf and break things up into multiple
commands as needed.
Doesn't xargs do exactly this?
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://n
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 07:47:45 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal wrote:
> I've never run into this error.
I usually run into this with things like "rm * */*" or so.
> Is there a specific length that triggers
> it? If so, we could chunk the tagging command. Or does the max length
> depend on the machine and s
On 15 April 2010 21:46, Carl Worth wrote:
[...]
> We'll probably need to arrange for notmuch to accept search
> specifications on stdin or so.
Or a daemon mode with a pipe or DBus interface.
Servilio
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
htt
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:46:56 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:04:38 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal
> wrote:
> > the region command only executes one "notmuch tag" command over
> > "id:X or id:Y or id:Z or ...".
>
> ...this operation is all set up to run into "argument list too long"
>
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:04:38 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:59:01 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> > We could fix all[*] the bugs of "*" by changing it to simply call the
> > new region-based tagging function. The only concern I have with that is
> > that it might be significant
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:04:38 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal wrote:
> Not quite true: the region command only executes one "notmuch tag"
> command over "id:X or id:Y or id:Z or ...".
Sorry -- I meant, of course: over "thread:X or thread:Y or thread:Z or ..."
__
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:59:01 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> We could fix all[*] the bugs of "*" by changing it to simply call the
> new region-based tagging function. The only concern I have with that is
> that it might be significantly slower, (it will execute N "notmuch tag"
> commands to tag the N
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 15:56:48 +0200, Xavier Maillard wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Apr 2010 13:51:01 -0600, Mark Anderson
> wrote:
> >
> > I think that '*' is definitely an awesome command, but I wonder if we
> > shouldn't have another command for the notmuch-search buffer which means
> > 'tag all the thre
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 08:56:48 -0500, Xavier Maillard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 6 Apr 2010 13:51:01 -0600, Mark Anderson
> wrote:
> >
> > I think that '*' is definitely an awesome command, but I wonder if we
> > shouldn't have another command for the notmuch-search buffer which means
> > 'tag all
Hi,
On Tue, 6 Apr 2010 13:51:01 -0600, Mark Anderson wrote:
>
> I think that '*' is definitely an awesome command, but I wonder if we
> shouldn't have another command for the notmuch-search buffer which means
> 'tag all the threads that I can see in this buffer'.
This is exactly what my initial
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 01:15:39 -0500, Xavier Maillard wrote:
> On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 07:38:03 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 06:37:53 +0200, Xavier Maillard wrote:
> > > Is there an easy way to mark a whole bunch of message (restricted
> > > in a region, result of a search,
Xavier Maillard wrote:
> Sadly, git is not really something I know wll enough to play with
> all this stuff :(
http://progit.org/book/
___
notmuch mailing list
notmuch@notmuchmail.org
http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 15:46:40 +1000, Jason White wrote:
> Xavier Maillard wrote:
>
> > You are right I forgot to mention I am using the GNU Emacs
> > interface exclusively.
>
> Then it's the * command from the buffer with the mail threads dislayed.
> See also the ?h command for further help.
Th
On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 07:38:03 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal wrote:
> On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 06:37:53 +0200, Xavier Maillard wrote:
> > Is there an easy way to mark a whole bunch of message (restricted
> > in a region, result of a search, ...) ?
>
> In addition to the "*" command that was mentioned, there i
On Sun, 04 Apr 2010 06:37:53 +0200, Xavier Maillard wrote:
> Is there an easy way to mark a whole bunch of message (restricted
> in a region, result of a search, ...) ?
In addition to the "*" command that was mentioned, there is a patch I
wrote to tag messages in search view by region in emacs. Y
Xavier Maillard wrote:
> You are right I forgot to mention I am using the GNU Emacs
> interface exclusively.
Then it's the * command from the buffer with the mail threads dislayed.
See also the ?h command for further help.
___
notmuch mailing list
no
On Sun, 4 Apr 2010 14:56:07 +1000, Jason White wrote:
> Xavier Maillard wrote:
> > Is there an easy way to mark a whole bunch of message (restricted
> > in a region, result of a search, ...) ?
>
> notmuch tag +|- [...] [--] [...] does
> this from the shell. If you want to do it from one of the
Xavier Maillard wrote:
> Is there an easy way to mark a whole bunch of message (restricted
> in a region, result of a search, ...) ?
notmuch tag +|- [...] [--] [...]
does this from the shell. If you want to do it from one of the user interfaces,
it depends on which one you're using.
__
21 matches
Mail list logo
