Jumping in here, I have modified the previously posted code here to
provide me with a more complete solution.
With the attach code, I can:
* automatically encrypt mails if all recipients have a *valid* public
key. The previous patch allowed encryption if a key existed but was
revoked,
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 09:19:51 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 23:48:30 -0500, Antoine Beaupré anar...@anarcat.ath.cx
wrote:
Jumping in here, I have modified the previously posted code here to
provide me with a more complete solution.
This looks good. I'll
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 09:45:01 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:20:26 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
Isn't it still necessary to ensure that you have encryption keys
appropriate to the recipient?
I want to ensure that all
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 06:23:01 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
Can you explain the logic that will apply to determine whether or not a
reply is encrypted?
My plan was to modify notmuch-reply.c to include a flag in the JSON
output if the message being replied to was encrypted. The
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 01:26:19 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 06:23:01 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
Can you explain the logic that will apply to determine whether or not a
reply is encrypted?
My plan was to modify
On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:20:26 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
Isn't it still necessary to ensure that you have encryption keys
appropriate to the recipient?
I want to ensure that all replies to encrypted to be encrypted. I would
rather have the reply fail outright than fall back to
On 01/25/2012 12:45 PM, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
Here's a behavior that I think would be reasonable:
* notmuch reply outputs JSON encrypted flag
* emacs does a quick check to see if the needed key is available
* if key not available: give a nice mini-buffer prompt, something like:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 09:19:51 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 23:48:30 -0500, Antoine Beaupré anar...@anarcat.ath.cx
wrote:
Jumping in here, I have modified the previously posted code here to
provide me with a more complete solution.
This looks good. I'll
On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:10:47 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:34:32 -0500, micah anderson mi...@riseup.net wrote:
David replied to it because it was sent to him, but the list email
hasn't come through yet (I want this functionality, so I'm
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 23:48:30 -0500, Antoine Beaupré anar...@anarcat.ath.cx
wrote:
Jumping in here, I have modified the previously posted code here to
provide me with a more complete solution.
This looks good. I'll switch over to using it.
Code is attached. Obviously, those function names
Hi David, notmuch developers,
On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 08:48:43 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 08:36:39 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
(if (and encrypt (dme:message-determine-encryption))
Oops. `encrypt' is set to `t' earlier if the code decides
On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 13:45:14 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
Unfortunately, auto encrypting of replies to encrypted emails is not yet
implemented. It is desperately needed, though, obviously. So this is a
good excuse to start a discussion about how we could
Hi Jameson,
* Jameson Graef Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net [12. Jan. 2012]:
On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 13:45:14 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
Unfortunately, auto encrypting of replies to encrypted emails is not yet
implemented. It is desperately needed, though,
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:05:14 +0100, Gregor Zattler telegr...@gmx.net wrote:
But how about not only replying encrypted but encrypting every
email if possible? Possible could mean different things,
though:
This is already easy to do in emacs, and doesn't require any special
notmuch support:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 20:05:14 +0100, Gregor Zattler telegr...@gmx.net wrote:
2) encrypt if suitable public keys for all recipients are in
GnuPGs key ring.
[...]
But I have no clue about how to do this with notmuch/Emacs.
Isn't that what David provides an elisp-snippet for in
Hi Jamie, notmuch developers,
On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 13:45:14 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 20:56:51 +0100, Gregor Zattler telegr...@gmx.net wrote:
I replied to a PGP/MIME signed and encrypted e-mail and was
astonished to realise that my reply
On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 13:45:14 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins
jroll...@finestructure.net wrote:
Any other suggestions?
In the function that I add to `message-send-hook' I do the following:
(message-goto-body)
;; If already set, don't override.
(if (not (looking-at
On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 08:36:39 +, David Edmondson d...@dme.org wrote:
(if (and encrypt (dme:message-determine-encryption))
Oops. `encrypt' is set to `t' earlier if the code decides that I want to
encrypt outgoing mail (it's not set for work purposes, in essence).
pgpVwxXz7acMP.pgp
On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 20:56:51 +0100, Gregor Zattler telegr...@gmx.net wrote:
I replied to a PGP/MIME signed and encrypted e-mail and was
astonished to realise that my reply was sent unencrypted (and
unsigened for that matter).
Yikes! Sorry this happened, and I hope nothing too sensitive was
19 matches
Mail list logo
