2010/1/28 martin f krafft madd...@madduck.net:
also sprach Jameson Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net [2010.01.26.1046
+1300]:
For example, I might have:
~/.notmuch-config:
[database]
path=/home/pioto/mail
...
[tags]
pi...@pioto.org/INBOX.ListMail.notmuch =
also sprach Servilio Afre Puentes servi...@gmail.com [2010.01.29.0132 +1300]:
[tags]
inbox = +inbox,+unread
sent = +sent
drafts = +draft
archive = -inbox
This proposal, on the other hand, is an interesting one, but when is
it supposed to happen? It just feels wrong to make this
Excerpts from martin f krafft's message of Thu Jan 28 15:39:10 -0500 2010:
also sprach Servilio Afre Puentes servi...@gmail.com [2010.01.29.0132
+1300]:
[tags]
inbox = +inbox,+unread
sent = +sent
drafts = +draft
archive = -inbox
This proposal, on the other hand, is an
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:49:34 -0500, Ben Gamari bgam...@gmail.com wrote:
Sounds like you need to add a line to crontab.
I haven't been following this thread closely so I hope this isn't too
out of context. I agree that certain things like notmuch-new should go
in the crontab, but I think that
also sprach Jameson Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net [2010.01.26.1046
+1300]:
For example, I might have:
~/.notmuch-config:
[database]
path=/home/pioto/mail
...
[tags]
pi...@pioto.org/INBOX.ListMail.notmuch = notmuch
So, a 'tags' section, where each
also sprach Jameson Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net [2010.01.27.0603
+1300]:
This is getting involved.
Maybe I'm missing something in this thread; but, why couldn't these complex
and
context-sensitive decisions be delegated to sub-processes? ala git hooks?
I think this idea is
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:12:52 +1300, martin f krafft madd...@madduck.net wrote:
also sprach Jameson Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net [2010.01.27.0603
+1300]:
This is getting involved.
Maybe I'm missing something in this thread; but, why couldn't these
complex and
also sprach James Westby jw+deb...@jameswestby.net [2010.01.28.1828 +1300]:
Are you trying to use thread: such that it could be passed to
notmuch show to see the conversation?
That's not going to work so well if so.
Why not? Works fine for me with the vim plugin...
--
martin |
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:34:21 +1300, martin f krafft madd...@madduck.net wrote:
also sprach James Westby jw+deb...@jameswestby.net [2010.01.28.1828 +1300]:
Are you trying to use thread: such that it could be passed to
notmuch show to see the conversation?
That's not going to work so well
Excerpts from Jameson Rollins's message of Mon Jan 25 15:46:55 -0600 2010:
I think this idea is a really good one and I would like to pursue it as
a tangent thread here. I was going to propose something very similar to
this. I think it's a very flexible idea that would help in a lot of
ways.
10 matches
Mail list logo
